Computer Processors
  Home arrow Computer Processors arrow Page 4 - 3D Processors, Stacking Cores
Dev Hardware Forums 
Computer Cases  
Computer Processors  
Computer Systems  
Digital Cameras  
Flat Panels  
Hardware Guides  
Hardware News  
Input Devices  
Memory  
Mobile Devices  
Motherboards  
Networking Hardware  
Opinions  
PC Cooling  
PC Gaming  
PC Speakers  
Peripherals  
Power Supply Units  
Software  
Sound Cards  
Storage Devices  
Tech Interviews  
User Experiences  
Video Cards  
Mobile Linux 
APP Generation ROI 
IBM® developerWorks 
Sun Developer Network 
Weekly Newsletter
 
Developer Updates  
Free Website Content 
 RSS  Articles
 RSS  Forums
 RSS  All Feeds
Write For Us Get Paid 
Request Media Kit
Contact Us 
Site Map 
Privacy Policy 
Support 
 USERNAME
 
 PASSWORD
 
 
  >>> SIGN UP!  
  Lost Password? 
COMPUTER PROCESSORS

3D Processors, Stacking Cores
By: Developer Shed
  • Search For More Articles!
  • Disclaimer
  • Author Terms
  • Rating: 4 stars4 stars4 stars4 stars4 stars / 27
    2005-09-20

    Table of Contents:
  • 3D Processors, Stacking Cores
  • Building a 3D CPU
  • Intel's Plans for Desktops
  • The Takeover of 3D Layered CPUs

  • Rate this Article: Poor Best 
      ADD THIS ARTICLE TO:
      Del.ici.ous Digg
      Blink Simpy
      Google Spurl
      Y! MyWeb Furl
    Email Me Similar Content When Posted
    Add Developer Shed Article Feed To Your Site
    Email Article To Friend
    Print Version Of Article
    PDF Version Of Article
     
     
    ADVERTISEMENT


    3D Processors, Stacking Cores - The Takeover of 3D Layered CPUs


    (Page 4 of 4 )

    There are plenty of promising technologies that failed due to x86 owning the market. Consumers not willing to part with backwards compatibility stick to the mainstream, though sometimes inferior, technology. As I mentioned in a prior article about the cell processor, the x86 has put superior architectures such as Amiga to bed. If the layered processor technology is not compatible with the x86 instruction set, it faces some trouble in gaining desktop acceptance.

    For an example of a new processor technology that didn’t support x86, take a look at Intel’s Itanium. To create a 64-bit processor, Intel decided to start from the ground up. The company built the Itanium without backwards compatibility. Of course, Intel didn’t make a strong attempt to penetrate the desktop PC market with it, probably foreseeing people becoming upset with starting on a whole new system. To make a long story short, the Itanium gained the nickname “Titanium.” AMD released their 64-bit processor that is backwards compatibility with 32-bit x86 systems. AMD has taken that market, and Intel has worked on developing a similar backwards compatible 64-bit to compete.

    This is at least demonstrative that technologies that may look incompatible could be designed to work with established architectures. Still, adding a new layer is a large change that would be a struggle to implement without large changes. Perhaps will try pulling another Itanium. Perhaps not.

    Still, if the new architecture is incompatible with traditional software, that doesn’t seal its doom. Desktop processors have not been increasing speed as quickly. Intel and AMD have been shrinking their processors and pumping up the Ghz for quite a while, but they may eventually hit a wall with the performance they can push out. This is partially the reason for experimenting with new technologies, like multiple cores. If x86 fails to meet the expectations of Moore’s Law, software demands probably won’t.

    Power hungry gamers and businesses will start looking at a more competent architecture if it has support for software or games that they want. Using an old architecture can only last for so long before backwards compatibility affects its capabilities. Of course, if x86 3D processors can be delivered, the results could easily be jaw dropping.


    DISCLAIMER: The content provided in this article is not warranted or guaranteed by Developer Shed, Inc. The content provided is intended for entertainment and/or educational purposes in order to introduce to the reader key ideas, concepts, and/or product reviews. As such it is incumbent upon the reader to employ real-world tactics for security and implementation of best practices. We are not liable for any negative consequences that may result from implementing any information covered in our articles or tutorials. If this is a hardware review, it is not recommended to open and/or modify your hardware.

       · 3D processors could be as big of a leap as the cell processor. It could be what...
       · but then they could of course build a 3d cell at some point in the future. it's...
       · They could build a 3D cell, but that's not quite the way things are...
       · Ok, but who is going to make the memory fast enough to handle a 20 CPU load? Gonna...
       · You're absolutely right. I think that's why chip developers are looking at SOC...
     

    COMPUTER PROCESSORS ARTICLES

    - VIA Nano
    - Intel Atom
    - Intel Celeron 420
    - Intel Pentium E2140
    - Inside the Machine by Jon Stokes
    - Chip History from 1970 to Today
    - A Brief History of Chips
    - Intel Shows Off at Developer Forum
    - Core 2 Quadro Review
    - Core Concepts
    - AMD Takes on Intel with AM2 and HT
    - Intel Presler 955: Benchmarking the First 65...
    - Computer Chip Scam, Pentium Pirates
    - Intel Beating AMD in the Race to 65nm Process
    - Magnetic Microchips Provide New Spin on Proc...






    © 2003-2008 by Developer Shed. All rights reserved. DS Cluster 1 hosted by Hostway
    Stay green...Green IT