San Francisco voters expel three school board members on CNN polls

As of Wednesday morning, more than 70% of voters supported the recall of school board chairwoman Gabriela Lopez, vice chairwoman Fouca Molica and commissioner Alison Collins. According to For the initial results of the San Francisco Electoral College. Their temporary replacements will be named after Mayor London Breit, who, in announcing his support for the withdrawal last year, said the city was at a “crossroads” and that the board’s priorities were “severely flawed”.

Molica tweeted that it was an honor to have served on the team. Lopez and Collins have not yet released public statements.

“Voters in this city have given a clear message that the school board should, above all, focus on the essentials of providing a well-functioning school system,” Breit said in a statement. “San Francisco is a city that believes in the value of big ideas, but those ideas need to be built on the foundation of a government that makes the essentials better.”

The seeds of anger that led to the recall attempt were sown early in the corona virus epidemic, when the board considered changing the names of 44 public schools in a city that was still struggling to reopen them safely. Discussions, became It is a matter of scratching the head in the national mediaIt sparked angry clashes between the city’s liberal establishment and the movement’s progressives.

Despite the fine lines of war in San Francisco and the debate over local conflicts, the successful recall campaign will be hailed by conservatives across the country as they seek to win “parental rights” mainly in the suburbs. Voters were paralyzed by former President Donald Trump. Republicans, such as the new Virginia Governor Glenn Young and Florida Governor Ron Tsandis, the 2024 presidential candidate, are seeking to turn parental frustration over the Govt-era mandates into political gain. To clean up or audit history reading and teaching in schools across the country.

See also  Megan Rapinoe retires at end of NWSL season: what made USWNT star such a unique player

The driving forces behind the withdrawal, however, are largely straightforward – but have led to some very difficult debates among Democrats.

“At a difficult time like this, the decisions we make for our children will have long-term implications,” Mayor Breit explained in a Facebook post his support for the withdrawal. “That is why leadership in the face of these challenges is so important and should not be distracted by undue influence or political agendas.”

Opponents ridiculed this withdrawal as a seizure of huge monetary interests seeking to push progressive voices out of local power. They also pointed to a fair way for voters to express their opinion, with elections scheduled for nine more months.

The San Francisco Bernigrats, a progressive group, recommended a “no” vote on all three subjects recalled. On its website, the organization compares the current war to conservatism that ultimately failed Attempt to recall California Governor Gavin NewsomA Democrat, he campaigned last year and on a broader national front.

“These two reminders have one thing in common: they are attempts to disrupt the democratic process with large sums of money,” the panel said. “Across the country, right-wingers are attacking school boards; more than half of the signatures to qualify for the ballot were collected by those who paid $ 22 a signature, many of them from outside the state.”

The attempt to recall the Neighbors for a Better San Francisco, despite numerous large-scale money backers, including a political action group promoting the attempt to recall a progressive champion district attorney, Sesa Bowd, also received a significant delay. From the editorial board of the San Francisco Chronicle.

CNN poll: Economics and education can shape how Americans vote in 2022
On a piece Released over the weekendThe Chronicle argued that Lopez, Molika and Collins “failed to continue to shepherd the district and its students during the critical times of the epidemic” – the controversy over the reopening of schools, the enrollment controversy and the budget tragedy – added. The panel’s complex task of renaming dozens of schools was “unprecedentedly accepted in the United States as a farce to turn the broader impetus for historical computation into a farce.”

According to the Chronicle, the recall campaign raised nearly $ 2 million, while the organized support of dangerous group members, particularly Molika, raised only $ 86,000.

See also  Unraveling anosognosia: revealing brain networks hidden in ignorance

Lopez, who was elected to the committee in 2018, was selected by his colleagues to lead it in 2021, supporting his mission to reopen schools and stressing that the renaming process has never interfered with those efforts.

But the names of some schools, including Abraham Lincoln and George Washington, raised eyebrows in the city and across the country. U.S. Senate based in San Francisco. Diane Feinstein was also on the list when he became mayor in 1984, based on a decision to replace the Confederate flag damaged by protesters outside City Hall. There have also been instances where critics have speculated that on one occasion the Board misrepresented historical acts to individuals such as Paul Revere.

Under pressure in April last year, the board unanimously voted to suspend its plans. The names of the schools are all the same.

CNN’s Chris Boyd contributed to the report.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *