Computer Systems
  Home arrow Computer Systems arrow Page 2 - IBM ThinkPad X31 Review
Dev Hardware Forums 
Computer Cases  
Computer Processors  
Computer Systems  
Digital Cameras  
Flat Panels  
Hardware Guides  
Hardware News  
Input Devices  
Memory  
Mobile Devices  
Motherboards  
Networking Hardware  
Opinions  
PC Cooling  
PC Gaming  
PC Speakers  
Peripherals  
Power Supply Units  
Software  
Sound Cards  
Storage Devices  
Tech Interviews  
User Experiences  
Video Cards  
Mobile Linux 
APP Generation ROI 
IBM® developerWorks 
Sun Developer Network 
Weekly Newsletter
 
Developer Updates  
Free Website Content 
 RSS  Articles
 RSS  Forums
 RSS  All Feeds
Write For Us Get Paid 
Request Media Kit
Contact Us 
Site Map 
Privacy Policy 
Support 
 USERNAME
 
 PASSWORD
 
 
  >>> SIGN UP!  
  Lost Password? 
COMPUTER SYSTEMS

IBM ThinkPad X31 Review
By: DMOS
  • Search For More Articles!
  • Disclaimer
  • Author Terms
  • Rating: 4 stars4 stars4 stars4 stars4 stars / 24
    2004-10-04

    Table of Contents:
  • IBM ThinkPad X31 Review
  • Specifications
  • Bundled Stuff
  • Using the X31
  • Benchmarking
  • Benchmarking: 3DMark 2001SE, PCMark 04
  • Benchmarking: WinRAR, LAME, POV-Ray
  • Conclusions

  • Rate this Article: Poor Best 
      ADD THIS ARTICLE TO:
      Del.ici.ous Digg
      Blink Simpy
      Google Spurl
      Y! MyWeb Furl
    Email Me Similar Content When Posted
    Add Developer Shed Article Feed To Your Site
    Email Article To Friend
    Print Version Of Article
    PDF Version Of Article
     
     
    ADVERTISEMENT


    IBM ThinkPad X31 Review - Specifications


    (Page 2 of 8 )

    This X31, the 2632-CBU model, has the following specifications:

    • Processor: Intel Pentium M 1.4 Ghz processor
    • Memory: 256 MB PC2100 RAM
    • Hard Disk: 40 GB drive
    • Graphics: Ati Mobility Radeon 7000 (AGP 4X) with 16 MB RAM
    • Screen: 12.1” XGA TFT LCD display capable of 1024x768x32 bit color
    • Audio: Integrated SoundMax chip and speaker
    • Modem: Integrated 56K V.90 modem
    • Ethernet: Integrated Intel PRO/100 10/100 Ethernet controller
    • Wireless: Integrated Intel PRO/2100 802.11b Wireless controller
    • Weight: 3.6 lbs
    • Battery Life: Max rated life 5.5 hours
    • Ports: 2 USB 2.0 ports, IEEE 1394 (FireWire), 1 PC Card, 1 Serial, 1 Parallel, and external display, Infrared

    Keep in mind that the Pentium M is not the Mobile Pentium 4-M chip. The Pentium M chip is based on Intel's Banias core, which was revised to the Dothan core. Mobile Pentium 4-M processors are based on the Northwood core, the core whose most famous overclocker was the Pentium 4 2.4C. The primary difference between the Pentium M and the Pentium 4-M besides the core is hyperthreading support, which Banias does not have.

    Going back to the Banias core, the Pentium M in this X31, being based off of Intel's .13 micrometer process, ended up being a large chip because of its 1 MB of cache. This added up to 77 million transistors, compared to the desktop Pentium 4 Northwood's 55 million. While some of you would begin to wonder about the power use, the Banias core is very good in this regard.

    One reason for this is due to the Banias design. Instead of following Intel's usual "MHz Rules All" creed, the Israeli design team instead went back to the P6 core. P6 was the codename of the first Pentium Pro core before it came out. This was the first superscalar, out of order (OoO) execution core in the x86 world, and one of the first to be found anywhere. It was so good that it continued all the way to the Pentium III relatively intact, with only some minor tweaking done to add cache and increase its ability to scale in clock speed. Using that P6 design as the basis, they updated it with some parts found in the "Netburst" design that is at the core of the Pentium 4. The reason for not just starting off with the Netburst architecture is that its simply not efficient in terms of power or layout. However, it did have some very useful things in it that would be able to add performance to Banias.

    One of those parts taken from the Pentium 4 is the branch predictor.  Since the Netburst design can't afford the associated branches due to its extremely long pipeline and the associated latency that comes with flushing it, Intel did a lot of work to make sure that the penalty of flushing the pipe happens as little as possible. On top of the branch predictor, the Pentium M design team added to it a feature to make it even more efficient, specifically on "indirect" branches. These are hard to predict in general, as you don't know at compile time where the branch is going to go. By adding an extra buffer that keeps track of certain indirect branches' favourite "targets", the Pentium M is able to correctly guess those harder branches more often. How does this help?  By wasting fewer cycles executing code it's going to throw away, then emptying the pipeline, the Pentium M conserves its energy for work that is actually useful.

    Don't fall for the MHz Myth that happens to Intel fans and those who view clock speeds as the only method of indicating a processor's performance. Pentium M processors at 1.4 GHz are as fast or faster than Pentium 4-M 2.4 GHz counterparts, and can give regular Pentium 4 chips a run for their money. This gives the Pentium M an advantage because it can use less power and run faster. If you are in the market for a laptop to hold on to for a few years, you should heavily consider a Pentium M based solution.

    More Computer Systems Articles
    More By DMOS


       · The article commented that "There is also a PS/2 port for regular mice(...), an...
       · I have 768 MB of RAM in mine, and I have no issues with RAM.This is running Win XP...
       · You're right.Its a mistake - the comment should have read that the DOCK that...
       · Thanks for catching that. Yes, it should read that the dock comes with those ports,...
       · Error should be fixed. Thanks for the heads up.
       · Just got hold of an X31. Do i need a wireless PCMCIA card to enable me to connect to...
     

    COMPUTER SYSTEMS ARTICLES

    - Dell Studio 15 Laptop Review
    - The Asus Eee PC 900: a Preview
    - Gateway M-6834
    - The Gateway P172X FX Laptop
    - Gateway One Desktop PC Rivals the iMac
    - Dell Latitude D630
    - How to Upgrade a Notebook
    - Packard Bell Easy Note R0422 Review
    - Apple Mac Book Pro
    - Acer Aspire 5043 WLMI Series Laptop
    - A Different Kind of Tabletop Gaming
    - How to Max Out a Dell XPS 600 and Your Credi...
    - Benchmarking and Diagnostic Programs
    - 11 Things Most Builders Forget
    - A Computer Builder’s Guide to ESD

     
    Best Practices for Windows Vista Migration Presentation
    Dell and Microsoft recently held a series of face-to-face seminars entitled, &qu....

     
    Creating a Culture for Code Reuse
    If you oversee development teams you know that like it or not proprietary and ex....

     
    Keys to Web Application Acceleration: Advances in Delivery Systems
    Accelerate Web apps by up to 5x. Ensure significantly faster access to the Web a....

     
    Optimizing Application Monitoring
    Tired of finding out from your customers that you're offline? This white paper e....

     
    Solaris to Solaris Migration -- Migrating applications from Sun SPARC to Dell PowerEdge R900
    This comprehensive Migration Guide reviews the approach that Principled Technolo....

     





    © 2003-2009 by Developer Shed. All rights reserved. DS Cluster 6 hosted by Hostway
    Stay green...Green IT