Science
 
Forums: » Register « |  User CP |  Games |  Calendar |  Members |  FAQs |  Sitemap |  Support | 
 
User Name:
Password:
Remember me
Go Back   Dev Hardware ForumsGENERAL GooSH!™Science

Reply
Add This Thread To:
  Del.icio.us   Digg   Google   Spurl   Blink   Furl   Simpy   Y! MyWeb 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Unread Dev Hardware Forums Sponsor:
  Trader Rating: 2 · #16  
Old November 2nd, 2004, 07:00 PM
Dngrsone's Avatar
Dngrsone Dngrsone is offline
Designated Asshole
Dev Hardware God 8th Plane (8500 - 8999 posts)
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: In the space between you and I
Posts: 8,745 Dngrsone User rank is General 194th Grade (Above 100000 Reputation Level)Dngrsone User rank is General 194th Grade (Above 100000 Reputation Level)Dngrsone User rank is General 194th Grade (Above 100000 Reputation Level)Dngrsone User rank is General 194th Grade (Above 100000 Reputation Level)Dngrsone User rank is General 194th Grade (Above 100000 Reputation Level)Dngrsone User rank is General 194th Grade (Above 100000 Reputation Level)Dngrsone User rank is General 194th Grade (Above 100000 Reputation Level)Dngrsone User rank is General 194th Grade (Above 100000 Reputation Level)Dngrsone User rank is General 194th Grade (Above 100000 Reputation Level)Dngrsone User rank is General 194th Grade (Above 100000 Reputation Level)Dngrsone User rank is General 194th Grade (Above 100000 Reputation Level)Dngrsone User rank is General 194th Grade (Above 100000 Reputation Level)Dngrsone User rank is General 194th Grade (Above 100000 Reputation Level)Dngrsone User rank is General 194th Grade (Above 100000 Reputation Level)Dngrsone User rank is General 194th Grade (Above 100000 Reputation Level)Dngrsone User rank is General 194th Grade (Above 100000 Reputation Level)  Folding Points: 498159 Folding Title: Super Ultimate Folder - Level 1Folding Points: 498159 Folding Title: Super Ultimate Folder - Level 1Folding Points: 498159 Folding Title: Super Ultimate Folder - Level 1Folding Points: 498159 Folding Title: Super Ultimate Folder - Level 1Folding Points: 498159 Folding Title: Super Ultimate Folder - Level 1Folding Points: 498159 Folding Title: Super Ultimate Folder - Level 1
Time spent in forums: 6 Months 1 Week 6 Days 7 h 28 m 37 sec
Reputation Power: 13893
Quote:
Originally Posted by erich
Hi Dogrsone:

Yes, the DOD draft review with the "Walmart prices" and "MIT considers this revolutionary technology" are rosy.

Considering the low end speed of 600 KM/SEC and the . 6 seconds they have maintained these toroids 62 miles is nothing. the limits are time and atmosphere.

Their theoretic papers support that the colliding toroids will reach the temperatures and pressures for fusion. Remember much of the initiation energy is kinetic. In my next post to EPS I plan to pin Clint Seward down on the current time line and progress of work toward a demonstration of break even. Also with that nice web site where's the video?

They propose a 5KW home generator touting costs of .0005 cents/KWhr. All sorts of propulsion applications, it's on their site.

Thanks for the reply

I can buy that the toroid is pretty stable in a static setting, but when you are shooting this thing at speed, I would think that collisions with atmosphere would lead to instability in fairly short order, is all I'm saying.

Ilike like to see a video, and a time line (without the flowers )
__________________
Ask Questions the Smart Way


"In front of a monitor is a dangerous place from which to view the world." --Terri Wells

Enable BSOD: Control Panel/Systems, Advanced Tab, hit the Settings button under Startup and Recovery, and under the System Failure area, uncheck the Automatically Restart checkbox.

Reply With Quote
  Trader Rating: 0 · #17  
Old November 2nd, 2004, 08:00 PM
hey hey is offline
Goh bebareh roo gahbret
Dev Hardware Loyal (3000 - 3499 posts)
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Plaz00!
Posts: 3,069 hey User rank is Second Lieutenant (5000 - 10000 Reputation Level)hey User rank is Second Lieutenant (5000 - 10000 Reputation Level)hey User rank is Second Lieutenant (5000 - 10000 Reputation Level)hey User rank is Second Lieutenant (5000 - 10000 Reputation Level)hey User rank is Second Lieutenant (5000 - 10000 Reputation Level)hey User rank is Second Lieutenant (5000 - 10000 Reputation Level)hey User rank is Second Lieutenant (5000 - 10000 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: 4 Days 18 h 41 m 49 sec
Reputation Power: 77
I need to brush up on my reading. Stuff like this is fascinating.

Heck, I was thrilled when I discovered Streling Engines could be used at low sound levels.
__________________
Farsi for Teh W1n

Reply With Quote
  Trader Rating: 0 · #18  
Old November 2nd, 2004, 08:18 PM
erich erich is offline
Contributing User
Dev Hardware Newbie (0 - 499 posts)
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 63 erich User rank is Corporal (100 - 500 Reputation Level)erich User rank is Corporal (100 - 500 Reputation Level)erich User rank is Corporal (100 - 500 Reputation Level)erich User rank is Corporal (100 - 500 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: 1 h 23 m 27 sec
Reputation Power: 7
Hey Hey,

Is this the stirling engine you were thrilled about? I sent this link to Clint Seward at EPS to consider as a component in his proposed home fusion generator.

Acoustic Stirling Heat Engine Home | Los Alamos National Laboratory

Reply With Quote
  Trader Rating: 0 · #19  
Old November 5th, 2004, 12:49 AM
erich erich is offline
Contributing User
Dev Hardware Newbie (0 - 499 posts)
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 63 erich User rank is Corporal (100 - 500 Reputation Level)erich User rank is Corporal (100 - 500 Reputation Level)erich User rank is Corporal (100 - 500 Reputation Level)erich User rank is Corporal (100 - 500 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: 1 h 23 m 27 sec
Reputation Power: 7
Some answers to Toroid Plasma Questions

Dear Folks:
After posting to several Science, physics and Energy forums I collected up comments and questions and asked Clint Seward , president of Electron Power Systems, to respond:


"Your most important point was that others have suggested that I should be
able to demonstrate a collision of EST's and even a level of fusion with a
few hundred thousand dollars and about a year. I agree. Here is what I
need to do:

1. Capture the EST in a way that I can measure them. I have designed a
method in the last two months that will do this.
2. Measure the density of the EST. This requirement is something everyone
is asking for, and will enable me to get serious funding from sponsors.
3. Collide two EST's. I have found a simple way to do this based on the
TRISOPS work by Wells.
4. Consulting work by Chen to verify the physics I have outlined for the
density.
5. Make and measure an EST based on Deuterium.
6. Collide two Deuterium EST's.

Each of these requires some cash outlays, so I am working them as I can get
resources. Several people, including yourself, are considering helpful
investments of $5k to $10k to 25K to 50K to 100k. Work will progress with
any investment, no matter how small. Capturing an EST is a $5k investment.

Your second most important point is that more people want to see more data
and even a video. I have many of these, but have not published them yet. I
have concentrated on the physics, which I feel I now know completely, and
can get confirmed. This is a smaller effort, about $15k.

You suggested an article from the SF Chronicle that you might send. Please
do.

Again, thanks for the call.

Clint Seward"



Also Eric Lerner of Focus Fusion sent this report on his progress:


<DIV>"Dear friend of Focus Fusion,

<>Thanks for your support of and interest in Focus Fusion. <>

Reply With Quote
  Trader Rating: 0 · #20  
Old November 5th, 2004, 12:53 AM
erich erich is offline
Contributing User
Dev Hardware Newbie (0 - 499 posts)
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 63 erich User rank is Corporal (100 - 500 Reputation Level)erich User rank is Corporal (100 - 500 Reputation Level)erich User rank is Corporal (100 - 500 Reputation Level)erich User rank is Corporal (100 - 500 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: 1 h 23 m 27 sec
Reputation Power: 7
Also Eric Lerner of Focus Fusion sent this report on his progress:

<DIV>"Dear friend of Focus Fusion,

<>Thanks for your support of and interest in Focus Fusion. <>

Reply With Quote
  Trader Rating: 0 · #21  
Old November 5th, 2004, 12:55 AM
erich erich is offline
Contributing User
Dev Hardware Newbie (0 - 499 posts)
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 63 erich User rank is Corporal (100 - 500 Reputation Level)erich User rank is Corporal (100 - 500 Reputation Level)erich User rank is Corporal (100 - 500 Reputation Level)erich User rank is Corporal (100 - 500 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: 1 h 23 m 27 sec
Reputation Power: 7
Focus Fusion Progress report

Also Eric Lerner of Focus Fusion sent this report on his progress:

<DIV>"Dear friend of Focus Fusion,

<>Thanks for your support of and interest in Focus Fusion. <>

Reply With Quote
  Trader Rating: 0 · #22  
Old November 5th, 2004, 12:58 AM
erich erich is offline
Contributing User
Dev Hardware Newbie (0 - 499 posts)
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 63 erich User rank is Corporal (100 - 500 Reputation Level)erich User rank is Corporal (100 - 500 Reputation Level)erich User rank is Corporal (100 - 500 Reputation Level)erich User rank is Corporal (100 - 500 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: 1 h 23 m 27 sec
Reputation Power: 7
Sorry ,Can't get it to post,

Reply With Quote
  Trader Rating: 0 · #23  
Old November 5th, 2004, 07:51 PM
erich erich is offline
Contributing User
Dev Hardware Newbie (0 - 499 posts)
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 63 erich User rank is Corporal (100 - 500 Reputation Level)erich User rank is Corporal (100 - 500 Reputation Level)erich User rank is Corporal (100 - 500 Reputation Level)erich User rank is Corporal (100 - 500 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: 1 h 23 m 27 sec
Reputation Power: 7
There got it to posts, I'm am an idiot sometimes

Also Eric Lerner of Focus Fusion sent this report on his progress:

<DIV>"Dear friend of Focus Fusion,

Thanks for your support of and interest in Focus Fusion.

Reply With Quote
  Trader Rating: 0 · #24  
Old November 5th, 2004, 07:59 PM
erich erich is offline
Contributing User
Dev Hardware Newbie (0 - 499 posts)
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 63 erich User rank is Corporal (100 - 500 Reputation Level)erich User rank is Corporal (100 - 500 Reputation Level)erich User rank is Corporal (100 - 500 Reputation Level)erich User rank is Corporal (100 - 500 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: 1 h 23 m 27 sec
Reputation Power: 7
Maybe this time,

Progress report from Eric Lerner of Focus Fusion:


"I’m writing you to update you on our Focus Fusion project and to ask for your help. As you may know from our website or newsletter, this year we came very close to winning a $2 million grant from the Advanced Technology Program of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), US Dept. of Commerce. The grant is to develop the dense plasma focus as a powerful x-ray source for infrastructure inspection, but the research involved is essentially the same as that required to reach fusion break-even. While NIST gave us high marks for the technical proposals and we passed Gate 1 of their procedure, we failed Gate 2, which judged the financial side of the plan. In the de-briefing, the NIST representatives assured us that we had an excellent chance of getting the grant in 2005 if we corrected some problems in our business submission.
First, they said we needed more proof that we had tried to raise the $2 million privately and from other government agencies and were unable to. Second, since they will not fund facility rent, considering this an indirect expense, they needed to see pledges from investors that they would cover this cost for at least the first year, in the event the grant was awarded. We estimate that this will involve a maximum of $100,000. In addition, they wanted more evidence that state departments of transportation and other final customers would actually want the x-ray scanner if we succeed. (We have already started to receive these assurances. I’ve attached one from the California DOT.)

<DIV> Finally, they did say that they expected to see at least some small technical progress during the period since our last application in January, even though they realized that this would be limited by available funding.

Reply With Quote
  Trader Rating: 0 · #25  
Old November 6th, 2004, 06:40 PM
Rogue's Avatar
Rogue Rogue is offline
Contributing User
Dev Hardware Newbie (0 - 499 posts)
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: In the land of milk and honey
Posts: 127 Rogue User rank is Private First Class (20 - 50 Reputation Level)Rogue User rank is Private First Class (20 - 50 Reputation Level)  Folding Points: 75431 Folding Title: Intermediate FolderFolding Points: 75431 Folding Title: Intermediate FolderFolding Points: 75431 Folding Title: Intermediate FolderFolding Points: 75431 Folding Title: Intermediate Folder
Time spent in forums: 13 h 51 m 44 sec
Reputation Power: 7
what are the stock symbols for thesse companies. This stuff sounds like the next Microsoft in oney makin. Anyways all this cheap energy sounds like Chain Reaction the movie
__________________
It takes hundreds of nuts to hold a car together, but it takes only one of them to scatter it all over the highway.

Reply With Quote
  Trader Rating: 0 · #26  
Old November 6th, 2004, 07:33 PM
erich erich is offline
Contributing User
Dev Hardware Newbie (0 - 499 posts)
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 63 erich User rank is Corporal (100 - 500 Reputation Level)erich User rank is Corporal (100 - 500 Reputation Level)erich User rank is Corporal (100 - 500 Reputation Level)erich User rank is Corporal (100 - 500 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: 1 h 23 m 27 sec
Reputation Power: 7
Prometheus II, EPS, and Focus Fusion are making private offerings of stock. None are on an open market.

Reply With Quote
  Trader Rating: 0 · #27  
Old November 15th, 2004, 04:34 PM
Rogue's Avatar
Rogue Rogue is offline
Contributing User
Dev Hardware Newbie (0 - 499 posts)
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: In the land of milk and honey
Posts: 127 Rogue User rank is Private First Class (20 - 50 Reputation Level)Rogue User rank is Private First Class (20 - 50 Reputation Level)  Folding Points: 75431 Folding Title: Intermediate FolderFolding Points: 75431 Folding Title: Intermediate FolderFolding Points: 75431 Folding Title: Intermediate FolderFolding Points: 75431 Folding Title: Intermediate Folder
Time spent in forums: 13 h 51 m 44 sec
Reputation Power: 7
dam, i could've been rich

Reply With Quote
  Trader Rating: 0 · #28  
Old December 10th, 2004, 01:55 PM
erich erich is offline
Contributing User
Dev Hardware Newbie (0 - 499 posts)
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 63 erich User rank is Corporal (100 - 500 Reputation Level)erich User rank is Corporal (100 - 500 Reputation Level)erich User rank is Corporal (100 - 500 Reputation Level)erich User rank is Corporal (100 - 500 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: 1 h 23 m 27 sec
Reputation Power: 7
Plasma Toroid Fusion Update

Clint Seward recently sent me this response to the few questions raised by folks on the various forums I have posted questions to:

"Your most important point was that others have suggested that I should be
able to demonstrate a collision of EST's and even a level of fusion with a
few hundred thousand dollars and about a year. I agree. Here is what I
need to do:

1. Capture the EST in a way that I can measure them. I have designed a
method in the last two months that will do this.
2. Measure the density of the EST. This requirement is something everyone
is asking for, and will enable me to get serious funding from sponsors.
3. Collide two EST's. I have found a simple way to do this based on the
TRISOPS work by Wells.
4. Consulting work by Chen to verify the physics I have outlined for the
density.
5. Make and measure an EST based on Deuterium.
6. Collide two Deuterium EST's.

Each of these requires some cash outlays, so I am working them as I can get
resources. Several people, including yourself, are considering helpful
investments of $5k to $10k to 25K to 50K to 100k. Work will progress with
any investment, no matter how small. Capturing an EST is a $5k investment.

Your second most important point is that more people want to see more data
and even a video. I have many of these, but have not published them yet. I
have concentrated on the physics, which I feel I now know completely, and
can get confirmed. This is a smaller effort, about $15k.

You suggested an article from the SF Chronicle that you might send. Please
do.

Again, thanks for the call."


He is also working with Paul Bellan : Spheromak Formation - Paul Bellan


I have been at this for a few months, you have seen the most important posts among my contacts with the Fusion players. Look over their web sites and tell me what you think. EPS seems the strongest and most advanced, and I love the scalability, cars, distributed power, airplanes, space propulsion, etc



Eric Lerner sites interesting astrophyical correlates of toroidal phenomena beyond ball lighting. I am hoping the currant new space probes aimed at better observations of gama-ray burst will support his thinking.
Also this new discovery about Gamma and X-rays in lighting lends support: http://www.nature.com/news/2004/040906/full/431120a.html

Eric Lerner recently sent this progress report on his efforts:
"Dear friend of Focus Fusion,

<>Thanks for your support of and interest in Focus Fusion. <>

I'm writing you to update you on our Focus Fusion project and to ask for your help. As you may know from our website or newsletter, this year we came very close to winning a $2 million grant from the Advanced Technology Program of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), US Dept. of Commerce. The grant is to develop the dense plasma focus as a powerful x-ray source for infrastructure inspection, but the research involved is essentially the same as that required to reach fusion break-even. While NIST gave us high marks for the technical proposals and we passed Gate 1 of their procedure, we failed Gate 2, which judged the financial side of the plan. In the de-briefing, the NIST representatives assured us that we had an excellent chance of getting the grant in 2005 if we corrected some problems in our business submission.
First, they said we needed more proof that we had tried to raise the $2 million privately and from other government agencies and were unable to. Second, since they will not fund facility rent, considering this an indirect expense, they needed to see pledges from investors that they would cover this cost for at least the first year, in the event the grant was awarded. We estimate that this will involve a maximum of $100,000. In addition, they wanted more evidence that state departments of transportation and other final customers would actually want the x-ray scanner if we succeed. (We have already started to receive these assurances. I’ve attached one from the California DOT.)

<>Finally, they did say that they expected to see at least some small technical progress during the period since our last application in January, even though they realized that this would be limited by available funding. <>

So I am writing you to ask you to do one of three things, any of which would be helpful to us. First, I would like to ask you to consider investing in Lawrenecville Plasma Physics, Inc.(LPP)’s x-ray source project. (NIST rules require this money go to a for-profit, rather than not-for-profit entity, so we applied on behlaf of LPP, not Focus Fusion Society). I’ve attached a summary of the project. This project contributes immensely to the development of focus fusion, but it also has a lower risk, and a faster prospect of financial return. Your investment will contribute in three ways: first, it will help to finance the small new simulation we will carry out to optimize x-ray production, increasing our chances of winning the NIST grant. Second, in the event we do win the NIST grant, it will aid us in accomplishing the project. While we believe we can succeed with $2 million, unexpected contingencies are always possible in research and more money is useful. Third, this money can go toward the $100,000 that we need for the first year’s facility rent. You can see LPP's overall business plan at our website, http://www.lawrencevilleplasmaphysics.com/. <>

Investments can be made by purchasing LPP non-voting shares at $120 a share in minimum blocks of 25 shares. By SEC regulations, to make this investment you must be an “accredited investor” which means that you have one million dollars in net worth (house included) or an income of $200,000 dollars year. <>

If you can not make an investment in this project now, I would very much appreciate your sending me a letter, on your letterhead, explaining very briefly why you can’t do this (too high risk, insufficient funds available, not an accredited investor, etc.) We can use these letters as proof that we can’t raise $2 million from private sources in our next NIST application, so they are very important. You can send these letters either as hard copy to our new address: LPP, 11 Calvin Terrace, West Orange NJ 07052, or to my email address as a PDF file. This will only take you a few minutes, but is going to be invaluable to us. <>

Third, you can make a contractual pledge to provide all or part of the $100,000 that we need to cover our first year facility rent in the event that we are awarded the NIST grant. This money will only be due IF we get the $ 2 million grant and are thus assured the funds we need to do the job. Again, this investment will be in the form of the purchase of LPP shares and will be subject to the same “accredited investor” restriction. <>

I hope that you will be able to help us in one of these three ways. I look forward to your response. Feel free to contact me by email or at 973-736-0522. <>

Warm regards, Eric J. Lerner <>
President
Lawrenceville Plasma Physics, Inc. "



Paul Koloc has been working in this field the longest. One interesting point about his approach is that His lawyers have put up the money for his patent application.

Comparison between PLASMAKä BL Model and Formed PMKs

All these guys are scouring the government and private investor for support of their next experiment to demonstrate the viability of their respective approaches.

This is such a specialized area of plasma physics very few people, even in the field, feel confident to respond to my posted questions. Although These postings have intrigued many, over 3000 viewing, with only two dozen replies, I feel that this technology needs to be presented to a wider audience. I have sent this info to several science magazines, the only one that showed an interest was Popular Mechanics (the yellowish journal of technology) how ever they have millions of readers. That was a month ago, I hope it pans out.


This technology is so green (only by product helium) and solves such a panoply of world problems, if it is viable, it is the fuel on the American dream.

Thanks for your attention,

Erich

Reply With Quote
  Trader Rating: 0 · #29  
Old February 3rd, 2005, 04:09 PM
erich erich is offline
Contributing User
Dev Hardware Newbie (0 - 499 posts)
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 63 erich User rank is Corporal (100 - 500 Reputation Level)erich User rank is Corporal (100 - 500 Reputation Level)erich User rank is Corporal (100 - 500 Reputation Level)erich User rank is Corporal (100 - 500 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: 1 h 23 m 27 sec
Reputation Power: 7
A negitive review of p-B11 efforts

Darren Garnier of the levitated Dipole experiment:

MIT, Columbia begin new 'hot' fusion experiment - MIT News Office

Had this to say about the p-B11 efforts:

"I, like most of my colleagues in fusion research, are hesitant to
comment about this work. Mainly because when we do, we often end up
being accused of having motives other than that of furthering
scientific understanding.

That said, I'll give you my understanding and my opinion. Many years
ago, I was interested in Koloc's Prometheus... it sounded exciting, and
at the time I was a first year graduate student. (You probably can
google me on it.) Anyhow, my conclusion at the time was it was an
unverified theory with significant holes in it.

In the meantime, I've learned a lot of plasma physics, a lot about
building experiments and diagnosing them, and about "alternative
concepts". Many of which are pursued at a serious level through
funding by the Department of Energy's Office of Fusion Energy Research.
(Like my own experiment, the Levitated Dipole Experiment).

Here's what I've learned. Concepts similar to these "toroid" plasmas
have been and are still being researched. There are at least 3
spheromak experiments that can think of off the top of my head in the
US. (They are not surrounded by atmospheric gases though). There are
2 experiments currently being pursued that are try to collide two
spheromaks together to form (possibly) a "field reversed configuration"
or FRC. The investigators working on these projects, I'm sure, would
tell you that a lot of work still needs to be done to even determine if
one of these devices could reach ignition, let alone 0.0005
cents/kW-hr.

As far as p-B11 as a fuel goes, this is even harder to consider. Sure
its an available fuel, but there have been significant efforts to
determine its cross-section and it doesn't look feasible. Technically,
the temperatures required would likely make synchrotron radiation of
the boron snuff out the fusion fire. (That's why on LDX, which we
hope to have minimal neutron radiation, we hope to have a "catalysed
D-D" reaction.... But, I'll tell you, it ain't happening in the next
10 years, and won't be put into cars).

About the quote from the DOD review. I can't speak for "MIT", but I
and I would guess most of the scientists working at the MIT Plasma
Science and Fusion Center, would not agree.

Speaking for myself, I can say only this. In general I support
research in "alternative concepts". However, I'm very wary of
proponents who promise too much too soon. The fusion community burned
itself badly 40 years ago when its said that, in just a few years
fusion energy plants will produce electricity that is too cheap to
meter. In the end, very proposal for research should be well
presented with respect to prior work and reviewed so that claims by the
proponents can be evaluated in the course of the research.

Cheers,

Darren."




This technology is so green (only by product helium) and solves such a panoply of world problems, if it is as viable as the Department of Defense feels it is, it is the fuel of the American dream.

Thank you for your Attention.

Erich J. Knight

Reply With Quote
  Trader Rating: 0 · #30  
Old February 3rd, 2005, 05:13 PM
butmunch butmunch is offline
Moz
Dev Hardware Frequenter (2500 - 2999 posts)
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Leeds
Posts: 2,796 butmunch User rank is Major General (70000 - 90000 Reputation Level)butmunch User rank is Major General (70000 - 90000 Reputation Level)butmunch User rank is Major General (70000 - 90000 Reputation Level)butmunch User rank is Major General (70000 - 90000 Reputation Level)butmunch User rank is Major General (70000 - 90000 Reputation Level)butmunch User rank is Major General (70000 - 90000 Reputation Level)butmunch User rank is Major General (70000 - 90000 Reputation Level)butmunch User rank is Major General (70000 - 90000 Reputation Level)butmunch User rank is Major General (70000 - 90000 Reputation Level)butmunch User rank is Major General (70000 - 90000 Reputation Level)butmunch User rank is Major General (70000 - 90000 Reputation Level)butmunch User rank is Major General (70000 - 90000 Reputation Level)butmunch User rank is Major General (70000 - 90000 Reputation Level)butmunch User rank is Major General (70000 - 90000 Reputation Level)  Folding Points: 241 Folding Title: Novice Folder
Time spent in forums: 3 Weeks 2 Days 3 h 41 m 54 sec
Reputation Power: 778
Send a message via MSN to butmunch
Wow, thanks for the update erich I'm suprised you remembered about these forums.
__________________

Reply With Quote
Reply

Viewing: Dev Hardware ForumsGENERAL GooSH!™Science > High Density Plasma Toroid Fusion


Thread Tools  Search this Thread 
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes  Rate This Thread 
Rate This Thread:


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
View Your Warnings | New Posts | Latest News | Latest Threads | Shoutbox
Forum Jump




 Free IT White Papers!
 
How to Present Effectively Online
This white paper offers practical and actionable advice on the key steps that any presenter should consider as they plan and execute a Webinar or online meeting.

 
Open Source Security Myths
Open Source Software (OSS) is computer software whose source code is available to the general public with relaxed or non-existent intellectual property restrictions (or arrangement such as the public domain), and is usually developed with the input of many contributors.

 
Power and Cooling Capacity Management for Data Centers
This paper describes the principles for achieving power and cooling capacity management.

 
Scalable, Fault-Tolerant NAS for Oracle - The Next Generation
For several years NAS has been evolving as a storage alternative for Oracle databases, and for good reason: NAS is quite often the simplest, most cost-effective storage approach for Oracle. Learn about the benefits that HP's approach to scalable NAS brings to Oracle environments in this comprehensive white paper.

 
Understanding Web Application Security Challenges
This white paper discusses many common threats and preventive measures for Web application security, and explains what you can do to help protect your organization.

 

Forums: » Register « |  User CP |  Games |  Calendar |  Members |  FAQs |  Sitemap |  Support | 
     
 




© 2003-2010 by Developer Shed. All rights reserved. DS Cluster 2 Hosted by Hostway
For more Enterprise Application Development news, visit eWeek