| |||||||||
![]() |
|
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
Artificial Intelligence and Responsive Optimization: link. Check it out.
![]()
__________________
“Greatness, combined with the hint of a 24-carat lifestyle, is within us striving to make it through, craving for attention, and in the end, recognition, leaving a record worthy of biography on forging success stories.” —ME Check out MadHyeNa's Website & Article Index. Visit Nilpo.com - Ask the Windows Guru!™I succeed, conquer, and achieve, therefore I am.™ |
|
||||
|
If you believe that people "think", then computers "think".
Neither "think", thinking implies a degree of intelligence. Humans, granted have a great initial program which permits them to learn, expand and adapt their program, but I don't believe they truly 'think'. ----- Are we aware of our existence? Why? Because we say we are? Here is a simple CGI Script: http://www.wprime.net/a.cgi It reckons that it is aware of it's existence (it even spells like somebody too used to a spell-checker). Does that mean it thought up it's response? No, it was simply programmed to say that. Oh...after finishing reading mph... he pretty much said this...well I agree... I remember I made a simple AI which ran on msn (answers all the basic stuff, how are you, what is your name, and had a basic system where it'll save responses to statements and reuse them later - also read through my convo histories and did the same)... Sure its only input was text and its only output is text, so it's a little less advanced than your average human, but essentially the same. On that note it manage to attract and ask out this girl......(damn AI gets more action than me :P)
__________________
Quote:
Last edited by wwwww : May 3rd, 2007 at 11:35 PM. |
|
||||
|
Necro, yes I know. Do I care? Hardly.
Check out this article: The Age of Intelligent Machines: Can Computers Think? by Mitchell Waldrop. Also this entry of the The Best of Creative Computing Volume 2 (published 1977) by David H. Ahl is very interesting. Especially considering its age the described ideas quite meaningful. Last edited by madhyena : June 21st, 2007 at 06:28 AM. |
|
|||
|
this thread still going?
who cares if a pc or machine is self aware? what's that good for? being self aware means having emotions, the last thing i need - a pc that crashes cos its that day of the month, or a pc i have to take out for a scenic drive or to therapy cos it's depressed. what we want is intelligence = ability to learn things, imagine things, question things, etc. it can worry about how we all feel but not itself. being self-aware is good for kids toys like dolls or adult toys like blow-up dolls. y the f@#k am i wasting time talking sh!t when ive got things to do - damn procrastination |
|
||||
|
i cant wait for the day when we have robots for servants. we just have to be careful not to let any of the scifi scenarios like irobot or the cylons happen
__________________
Athlon 64 3000+, Saphire X1950 Pro, OCZ 1GB, MSI Neo4 PLatinum Apple Macbook Pro 15" Core 2 Duo 2.33 Ghz, 256mb X1600, 2GB RAM "If there's money to kill people, there's money to help people" - Tony Benn, former Labour MP. |
|
|||
|
To reply to the original question.
Short answer: NO. Long answer: Not until the information processing technology gets much better. Currently the human brain (responsible for what we call "thinking") is doing billions and billions of operations every second so matching this may take a while. |
|
||||
|
You are quickly becoming the necro poster of the week my friend...
__________________
Dell Inspiron E1405, C2D T5500 1.66GHz, 1GB DRR2-566, 80GB 5400RPM, 256MB Intel GMA950, CD-RW/DVD-ROM, 9-Cell Battery, 14.1" WXGA Custom X2 4000+, 2GB XMS2-6400, 250GB SATA Seagate, 256MB X700 Pro, NEC DVD-RW, 19" Samsung, Thermaltake 450W, Merc, MX518 |
|
|