| |||||||||
![]() |
|
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
Quote:
That would hurt our egos too badly. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
Right now fusion is the only alternate, "safe" source of energy even close to being mastered. Its the only concrete solution to our energy problems. |
|
||||
|
no way is it concrete. Right now, the only concrete way for us to get further in the future is for people to stop using and start conserving, start wanting the earth to last, start looking toward the future - and for really bad parents to stop having children
but that last bit is an entirely different argument |
|
|||
|
Quote:
Hey pyro I'm working on it ![]() |
|
||||
|
Quote:
Yes and no. Yes, fusion powers the sun. Difference is, fusion in the sun is completely uncontrolled and unstable. On earth we will use only particular isotopes of Hydrogen, which will result in atoms which were more stable than when the process began. We will still end up with plasmoids at extremely high temperatures - but it will be controlled. Whereas a fission reaction can become a chain reaction and the result is less stable. A fusion reaction would only be able to fuse the amount of raw tritium and deuterium provided, and would simply release neutrons as energy, with helium as a by-product. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
wouldnt say its that safe lol, it still hasnt been mastered, there still quite a big step away from getting near it. besides, they can do nuclear fusion, but what there trying to do is room temperature nuclear fusion, so then you dont need to put much energy into it so you overall get more out. also, people dont realise that nuclear fusion still pollutes - water is used to get hydrogen, this is turned into water vapour, and then pollutes the weather systems. |