Networking
 
Forums: » Register « |  User CP |  Games |  Calendar |  Members |  FAQs |  Sitemap |  Support | 
 
User Name:
Password:
Remember me
Go Back   Dev Hardware ForumsHARDWARENetworking

Reply
Add This Thread To:
  Del.icio.us   Digg   Google   Spurl   Blink   Furl   Simpy   Y! MyWeb 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Unread Dev Hardware Forums Sponsor:
  Trader Rating: 0 · #1  
Old June 19th, 2007, 07:38 AM
c128 c128 is offline
n00b DevH'er
Dev Hardware Newbie (0 - 499 posts)
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2 c128 User rank is Just a Lowly Private (1 - 20 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: 1 h 2 m 30 sec
Reputation Power: 0
Wake on LAN/directed packet - waking too much!

I'm using an Intel DG965WH motherboard as the basis for a loft-based server. The onboard Gigabit NIC is an Intel 82566DC Gigabit Ethernet Controller, and I have the latest Intel Proset XP drivers installed...

Now, to the problem .

I want this machine to wake from S3 standby on attempted access to any of its files (i.e. not "traditional" WOL via Magic Packet) - Intel's wording for this is "Wake on directed packet" and, when this is selected under the "Power Management" tab on the Ethernet Controller's driver pages, that's exactly what it does; try to access a previously active share on the machine when the machine is in S3 and it powers up. However...

Under XP's general Power Management stuff I have the machine set to sleep after 10 minutes, which it does, but it won't stay asleep even if there are no other machines active that are mapped to its network shares i.e. there shouldn't be any packets directed to it to wake it up/keep it awake but, nonetheless, it does wake up. Similar story if I put it directly into standby, it usually comes out of standby after 20 seconds or so...

Looking at the networking logging stuff as part of the Windows firewall...

My router is on the usual 192.168.1.1, and the machine in question has a fixed IP of 192.168.1.103. Is this something to do with my router pinging the machine in question and waking it up? In the log I see entries like this:

2007-06-19 10:30:12 OPEN-INBOUND TCP 192.168.1.1 192.168.1.103 5541 2869 - - - - - - - - -
2007-06-19 10:30:12 OPEN-INBOUND TCP 192.168.1.1 192.168.1.103 5542 2869 - - - - - - - - -
2007-06-19 10:30:12 OPEN-INBOUND TCP 192.168.1.1 192.168.1.103 5544 2869 - - - - - - - - -
2007-06-19 10:30:12 OPEN-INBOUND TCP 192.168.1.1 192.168.1.103 5545 2869 - - - - - - - - -

Although I can't say whether these are related to the wake-up up or not as, ehh, I guess they're logged after the machine has woken up .

Googling around I've found mention of a "Only allow management stations to bring the computer out of standby" setting, that suggests it might prevent random pings from waking the machine, but the Intel Proset driver doesn't seem to supply this option, and elsewhere I've found that this limits operation to direct and explicit "Magic Packet" only, which I'm not interested in...

Is it possible to use "Wake on Directed Packet" in the way I'm expecting to use it i.e. just wake when an attempt is made to access a previously shared file/folder, but not waking up all of the time as a side-effect? I want something automatic (hence not Magic Packet) and had based my server idea around this working...at the moment though, it's in a continual wake/sleep/wake/sleep cycle...

Reply With Quote
  Trader Rating: 0 · #2  
Old June 21st, 2007, 04:27 AM
c128 c128 is offline
n00b DevH'er
Dev Hardware Newbie (0 - 499 posts)
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2 c128 User rank is Just a Lowly Private (1 - 20 Reputation Level) 
Time spent in forums: 1 h 2 m 30 sec
Reputation Power: 0
I guess "Wake on Directed Packet" isn't something that many folk use then? To me it seemed an ideal way of building a server/NAS that would wake-up when accessed, but sleep when inactive...now I'm not so sure.

I've made a small bit of progress in that I've found if you pull the network cable the machine it will quite happily go to sleep as-per the Power Scheme settings. If you then re-connect the cable it doesn't wake up directly, and does just wake when an attempt is made to ping-it/access a previously open share on it - so that's kind of good.

The problem I'm having is getting the machine to sleep after a period of inactivity, with the network cable attached, without waking itself up again within 1-30 seconds, leading to a continual sleep/wake/sleep/cycle.

I'm currently suspecting that the router might be "pinging" the machine just after it goes to sleep, and hence waking it, but there's no diagnostic logs on the router itself to trace this... I've tried both Ethereal and Microsoft Network Monitor on a different machine on the network to try and see what's going on with the network at the time it wakes up, but nothing seems to be conclusively going towards the machine in question (at least I'm not seeing it).

Reply With Quote
Reply

Viewing: Dev Hardware ForumsHARDWARENetworking > Wake on LAN/directed packet - waking too much!


Thread Tools  Search this Thread 
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes  Rate This Thread 
Rate This Thread:


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
View Your Warnings | New Posts | Latest News | Latest Threads | Shoutbox
Forum Jump




 Free IT White Papers!
 
Create the Optimal Architecture for your Critical Applications
Warburton's the largest independently owned bakery in the UK faced a number of difficult challenges in providing the most robust yet efficient IT infrastructure for their organization's success. IBM's services combined with their xSeries servers created the perfect platform for their SAP environment with sufficient flexibility, and did so in very time effective fashion.

 
Five Best Practices for Deploying a Successful Service-Oriented Architecture
This white paper describes the benefits you can expect with SOA, and how IBM can help take your business there.

 
Gartner Magic Quadrant for Application Delivery Controllers
Gartner summarizes its view on Application Delivery Controllers, evaluates strengths and weaknesses of solutions, and provides Magic Quadrant reporting for a quick comparison across all vendors. Learn from Gartner how you can benefit from an all-in-one device like Citrix NetScaler that delivers the highest levels of availability, performance and security.

 
Knowledge is Power
What you don't know can hurt you, and is likely costing you money and increasing your security risks during an era of scarce resources. This white paper proposes six key strategies that enterprise security managers can use to improve their network defense posture.

 
Rationalizing the Multi-Tool Environment
The rationalized multi-tool approach is flexible, scalable and cost effective. It provides the necessary input to the IT service management business processes. It preserves prior investments in monitoring tools, empowers technologists to select the best tools with which to do their jobs, and enhances effective response to incidents.

 

Forums: » Register « |  User CP |  Games |  Calendar |  Members |  FAQs |  Sitemap |  Support | 
     
 




© 2003-2010 by Developer Shed. All rights reserved. DS Cluster 4 Hosted by Hostway
For more Enterprise Application Development news, visit eWeek