
December 21st, 2007, 09:43 AM
|
 |
I'm french... be gentle
|
|
|
|
Quote: | Originally Posted by Snod Blatter Memtest86+ is not a great program for checking for stability... My (admittedly ancient) memory is fine at 230MHz in memtest86+, but it's unstable under Windows. I think it has to do with the fluctuating load, where under memtest86+ it's full load all the time, never changing, but in Windows it can be idle and then under great load all of a sudden.
I have found this Windows-based utility to actually be better at finding errors than memtest86+, give it a shot  |
yea i use both memtest+ and memtest windows. but i think memtest+ is still more accurate. and like i said my pc was left alone in windows on idle for 24h and it would crap.
ok but nvm that. i think i have found the problem. i think it is a compatibility issue because they are running fine on my gf's pc. over 3800% coverage on 2 instance of memtest both testing 700mb each, and still running. i doubt they will crap seems to work pretty good.
on my pc i did the same thing but with kingston kit. seems to be ok here too.
so to conclude alll this i think its a compatibility issue with some components i have in my pc. perhaps the motherboard, but it says on the internet that they are compatible with my mobo. so this is a sad end of storry for me but a happy ending for my girlfriend because she benefits some nice memory... even if she doesnt care and she doesnt overclock.
|