|
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
| |
||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
|
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
File/Web Server
Specs: Seasonic 330 watts ASUS P3B-F Celeron 1.1ghz OC'd 1.4ghz F@H Stable 512MBs of PC133 Sdram Nvidia Vanta AGP One 10GB Fujitsu hard-drive *O/S Drive* HighPoint RocketRAID 1740 Four Seagate Barracuda ST3500630AS 500GB in Raid 5 One NIC card Standard 24x Cd-rom *<--- LOL> Loaded with CentOS 4.4 ROCKETRAID 1740 SPECS I got some new toys to play with. a Rocket raid 1740 and four seagate 500GB About three weeks ago, I did a OS reload going from windows to linux. The last 2 and half weeks I've been breaking in my 2 TB File/Web server. Now I want this machine back in action folding 2 cure. But I'm hesitant of doing it because I don't think the raid card comes with a hardware XOR. It taxes the processor 25% average and spikes to 40% once in awhile when its writing to disks. Is it safe to try to fold on the machine. I would hate for it to drop the array with 168GBs data. Last edited by Mad Professor : June 3rd, 2007 at 10:09 PM. |
|
||||
|
Oh, I see. That's a lot harder to answer...
Well, there is the option in the console client config that lets you specify how much CPU time it should use - you could always set it just to use 95% as a maximum or something. But, basically, I don't think there's any way that question can be answered for sure. F@H is CPU bound, not I/O bound so that should help the card get interrupts, and it is run at lowest priority... But I think the only way is to try it and see. How much stuff is on those massive drives? Is it possible to still back it all up? |
![]() |
| Viewing: Dev Hardware Forums > IMPORTANT INFORMATION > Dev Folding > F@H and Raid Array "?" |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
|
|
|