|
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
| |
||
| |||||||||
![]() |
|
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Newb ready to do first overclock
I have read through some of the tutorials here and I think I have a decent understanding about how to go about this. However I have already ran into my first question. I am using a EVGA nForce 680i board. If I understand what I have read I should set my FSB – Memory Clock Mode to unlinked so I don't have to worry about ratio between the FSB bus speed and the MEM bus speed. Is that correct?
I went ahead and tried it and noticed the timings have changed when I viewed them using CPU-Z. Unlinked: DRAM Freq: 266.7 FSB Dram: 1:1 CL: 4.0 tRCD: 4 tRP: 4 tRAS: 12 tRC: 16 CR: 1T Before unlink (auto): DRAM Freq: 400 FSB Dram: 2:3 CL: 5.0 tRCD: 5 tRP: 5 tRAS: 18 tRC: 23 CR: 2T Should I go back into the bios and change the unlinked settings to match the auto settings? At this point I am not trying to overclock the memory, I just haven't been able to figure out if the memory is underclocked at the current unlinked settings. System stats: Intel Core Duo E6600 Conroe EVGA nForce 680i SLI Mushkin PC2-6400 (400mhz) Thanks for any input, its much appreciated. |
|
|||
|
Thanks for the quik reply
I just found out my multiplier has been set on 8 instead of 9 since I owned the computer (6 months or so) lol. Off to experiment... |
|
|||
|
Quote:
That makes sense, I will give it a try. I thought we wanted the 1:1 ratio? Thanks for the help. I am up to 3.0ghz and haven't had to raise the voltage yet. Still testing how stable it is. |
|
|||
|
Thanks for the input. In my bios when I switch it to unlinked the FSB-Mem ratio automatically goes to auto. The only time I can adjust the ratio manually is when I set it to linked, so it appears its all good at the moment. I have it unlinked with ratio on auto. With the CPU at 3.0Ghz the ratio has changed to 5:4
This is fun ![]() |
|
||||
|
Ya 5:4 is perfectly fine.
When I first started overclocking I was given some great advice by a member here (madhyena). When overclocking, especially when dealing with new hardware, or overclocking the first few times in general. You really should only change one thing at a time. So you don't want to be trying to overclock ram and the cpu at the same time. Take things slow, don't push it yet. Get to a point where you are borderline stable and stress it for a bit with prime 95. Take things slow you don't have to jump to 3ghz+ that first day. The higher you go the harder it will be to get things stable. You will start dealing with more factors such as temperature. Have fun and get some nice benchmarks posted ![]()
__________________
winreference.com - The Complete Windows Reference Site! - Visit nilpo.com and Ask the Windows Guru!
SWK, I'll shove those lightsabers so far up your ass everyone will think you're a jackolantern! - Dngrsone
|
|
|||
|
Yes I am taking it slow. I am still at 3.0ghz and never getting over 51c underload. Just trying to see how low a voltage I can get away with. After running the computer at 2.1ghz since I owned it I am quiet happy with 3.0 at the moment. I have tried some various settings with the memory, but haven't noticed any distinct difference. Right now its linked and synced running at 333mhz 1:1 4+4+4+12+16. It has passed all the stability test so far, but I want to do some more.
My best score on 3dMark06 was an 11500. Thats with an 8800gtx, no idea if thats good or not. However before I started overclocking it was an 8900 ![]() |
|
|||
|
Thanks for the tips, I am planning on trying some stuff today. I realized I was a bit low on the 333mhz but I figured the lower timings would make up for it? I am basing this off of things I have read. I was trying to keep a 1:1 ratio, but I am open to all ideas and plan on trying all sorts of variations.
|