|
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
| |
||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
|
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
well all in all...it helps alot better in theory than in real world app's!!! don't get me wrong...i run dual channel and i wouldn't not run it!!! but don't expect to see you bench scores jump dramaticly!!!
![]()
__________________
R.I.P. Gene...You will be missed my friend! 1965-2006 R.I.P. Brother
|
|
||||
|
Quote:
well u aint going to use most of that bandwidth; but u can lower the dividers to run it at lower speeds (say PC3200 at 700Mhz*8Bytes) which will give a transfer rate of 5600MB/s still at yet you will be able to tighten the latencies to 2-2-2-5-1 probably |
![]() |
| Viewing: Dev Hardware Forums > HARDWARE > Benchmarking Tools > Will dual channel help? |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
|
|
|