|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
 |
|||||||||
| |
||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
| |
||
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 |
|
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
Dev Hardware Forums Sponsor:
|
|
|
July 2nd, 2009, 11:34 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Lima Vs Sparta??? Which one of these is faster?
These two processors both cost exactly the same, which one is faster?
this one - AMD Athlon 64 LE-1640 Lima 2.7GHz Socket AM2 45W Single-Core or this one - AMD Sempron LE-1300 Sparta 2.3GHz 512KB L2 Cache Socket AM2 45W Single-Core I am building an extremely low end local intranet server that will be running ubuntu. Since these cost the same, I want to pick the one which will yield better performance. Any advice? Does one have a newer architecture which is faster on a lower Ghz? URL's blocked, CPU descriptions copied from newegg.
|
|
July 13th, 2009, 12:29 AM
|
|||
|
|||
ATHLON 64 LE is better
dear member,
as i am also using AMD in my internet cafe, 4 of my systems were ATHLON 64 X2 DUAL CORE 2.0 ghz. they are running fine and good support for gaming and ubuntu linux too. 
|
|
July 13th, 2009, 08:46 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
I ended up going with a barebones kit that had an Intel Atom processor, It was $95 for a mobo, processor, and case, and fits the extremely low power ability I was trying to achieve.
|
|
| Viewing: Dev Hardware Forums > HARDWARE > AMD Processors > Lima Vs Sparta??? Which one of these is faster? |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Del.icio.us
Digg
Google
Spurl
Blink
Furl
Simpy
Y! MyWeb
Linear Mode
