Page 3 - Celeron Beats AMD 3000+?

Dev Hardware Forums Sponsor:

Trader Rating: 0 · #31

July 26th, 2005, 05:51 PM

000

000

Join Date: Aug 2004

Posts: 3,488

Time spent in forums: 2 Weeks 2 Days 12 h 30 m 57 sec
Warnings Level: 20
Number of bans: 2
Reputation Power: 1141

Quote:

Originally Posted by Secondgunman

Asus and their Dual BIOS makes almost impossible to mess up an overclock. I have seen benchmarks on overclocked Asus systems and they are fine (granted lower then some boards but not all). If you know what you are doing O/C ing an Asus is fine where it gets bad is the Newbs that use the AI O/C options.

Besides it is one of the board I like the MSI K8N's are the otherboards... I don't know what it is but every one I know has had bad mojo with BFG.

Well there was the over the edge tech I saw brake a MSI K8N over his head cutting himself up real good, but that dude was short a few sticks of RAM to start with... That was realy funny you had to be there, and I still want a copy of the security tape from that, the store wont sell me it

My 1st grade cousin spells better than that...

__________________
Dell Studio XPS 16": 2.4GHz C2D P8600, 4GB DDR3, Radeon 3670, BD-ROM/DVDRW Vista Home Premium 64-bit
Asus Essentio: 2.66GHz Core i7 920 @ 3.06 GHz, 9 GB DDR3, GTX260 "216", DVDRW/Vista Home Premium 64-bit, 23 inch 1080p Asus
Custom: 600 MHz Pentium III, 512 MB PC133, 60 GB WD Caviar, 50x CD-ROM, ATI Radeon 9200 PCI 128MB, Windows 98 SE, 15" LCD
HP Pavilion: 750 MHz Celeron M, 128 MB PC 100, 10 GB Hitachi, 16x CD-ROM, Windows 98 SE

Trader Rating: 0 · #32

July 26th, 2005, 09:02 PM

Michael900731

License to Kill

Join Date: Apr 2004

Location: Stockholm, Sweden

Posts: 448

Time spent in forums: 2 Days 23 h 28 m 33 sec
Reputation Power: 6

Hehehe.

__________________

Intel Core 2 Duo 3,0 Ghz | Gigabyte EP35-DS4 | 2 gig Kingston DDR2 | Gigabyte GeForce 9800GTX 512mb GDDR3

Trader Rating: 0 · #33

July 26th, 2005, 10:26 PM

Pyro Monkey

<~~ This is why I'm hot

Dev Hardware God 5th Plane (7000 - 7499 posts)

Join Date: Jan 2004

Location: <?php echo "At the console."; ?>

Posts: 7,274

Folding Points: 634350 Folding Title: Super Ultimate Folder - Level 2

Time spent in forums: 1 Month 3 h 40 m 16 sec
Reputation Power: 1363

when i dont know how to spell a word i spell it fo-net-ick-ah-lee or (if saying it quickly)
fo-net-ick-lee

__________________

...yeah you know you like that

Trader Rating: 0 · #34

July 26th, 2005, 11:19 PM

Silvestre

Devoted to Marshanda

Join Date: May 2004

Location: Germany - Hnvr

Posts: 901

Folding Points: 449208 Folding Title: Super Ultimate Folder - Level 1

Time spent in forums: 5 Days 3 h 19 m 54 sec
Reputation Power: 16

hehehe phonetically, huh?

Comments on this post

Pyro Monkey agrees: phoor bee-ingh a-buh-lle too ss-pehll

__________________
DFI NF4-UltraD, Opteron 148 @250MHzx11, Xtreem 2x1GBPC4000@254MHz 3-3-3-7, PowerColor X1950XT, WD Raptor 74GB, 2x Samsung 500GB SATAII, 3x Hitachi 400GB SATA, 2x Hitachi 400GB PATA, Seagate 500GB SATAII, Dual Zalman Reserator1, Silverstone ST750W, Syncmaster 172X, ...usw...

I'm FOLDING for DevH to find CURE, and my name is B, SolidB

Trader Rating: 0 · #35

July 27th, 2005, 12:37 AM

wwwww

is the new lol

Dev Hardware Specialist (4000 - 4499 posts)

Join Date: Apr 2004

Location: Sydney, Australia

Posts: 4,152

Folding Points: 4095 Folding Title: Novice Folder

Time spent in forums: 1 Week 5 Days 8 h 8 m 2 sec
Reputation Power: 1627

Quote:

Originally Posted by Secondgunman

He doesn't count too good too;

http://usa.asus.com/products/mb/socket939/a8nsli-d/a8nsli-d_l.jpg

1 bios chip.

1!=2

__________________

Quote:

Originally Posted by tejas

yaawwwwwwwwwwnnn...

Trader Rating: 0 · #36

July 27th, 2005, 09:13 AM

000

Join Date: Aug 2004

Posts: 3,488

Time spent in forums: 2 Weeks 2 Days 12 h 30 m 57 sec
Warnings Level: 20
Number of bans: 2
Reputation Power: 1141

Quote:

Originally Posted by wwwww

He doesn't count too good too;

http://usa.asus.com/products/mb/socket939/a8nsli-d/a8nsli-d_l.jpg

1 bios chip.

1!=2

He counts well, not good, well.

Trader Rating: 0 · #37

July 27th, 2005, 03:35 PM

Pyro Monkey

<~~ This is why I'm hot

Join Date: Jan 2004

Location: <?php echo "At the console."; ?>

Posts: 7,274

Time spent in forums: 1 Month 3 h 40 m 16 sec
Reputation Power: 1363

Quote:

Originally Posted by 000

He counts well, not good, well.

i pass'd skool. i cawnt nuhmbrs. yay! i see donkey! *dances around*

Trader Rating: 0 · #38

July 27th, 2005, 03:59 PM

000

Join Date: Aug 2004

Posts: 3,488

Time spent in forums: 2 Weeks 2 Days 12 h 30 m 57 sec
Warnings Level: 20
Number of bans: 2
Reputation Power: 1141

Quote:

Originally Posted by pyromonkey

i pass'd skool.

Is that so?

Trader Rating: 0 · #39

July 28th, 2005, 10:56 AM

Secondgunman

Casual DevH'er

Join Date: May 2005

Location: Edmonton Canada

Posts: 104

Time spent in forums: 21 h 36 m 14 sec
Reputation Power: 0

Nails in the coffin

Quote:

Originally Posted by 000

Look at some benchmarks. 2x, I don't think so. Intel holds AMD in terms of encoding and stuff. AMD does outperform Intel in some other areas by a large margin, but 2x, I don't think so.

Intel is about to be planted...

http://www.tomshardware.com/cpu/20041019/athlon64_4000-16.html
http://www.tomshardware.com/cpu/20050725/athlon_64_fx-03.html

The Chips talked about in this article are not even the best as they don't cover the FX57, FX59 or any of the Dual Cores, The final mastering of the FX57 & FX59 was done by two Engineers AMD picked up that jumped the Intel ship and the have done a few things on the Dual Cores as-well.

I remember someone flaming me for saying that AMD would break 3.2 Ghz in four quarters from last quarter. It was in real life not in a forum but now I lol and admen that the may break 3.8 by the end of next year... well "may" is not the word because I have money on it.

Trader Rating: 0 · #40

July 28th, 2005, 03:52 PM

Pyro Monkey

<~~ This is why I'm hot

Join Date: Jan 2004

Location: <?php echo "At the console."; ?>

Posts: 7,274

Time spent in forums: 1 Month 3 h 40 m 16 sec
Reputation Power: 1363

Quote:

Originally Posted by 000

Is that so?

yesh'm. and if it means anything, my sempron beats a 3000+ as well.

Trader Rating: 0 · #41

July 28th, 2005, 04:12 PM

ratm46and2

Hasta La Victoria Siempre

Join Date: Nov 2004

Location: Ohio

Posts: 229

Folding Points: 11685 Folding Title: Novice Folder

Time spent in forums: 4 Days 14 h 4 m 45 sec
Reputation Power: 25

Quote:

Originally Posted by Secondgunman

Yes those benchmarks for the first article are impressive.
It didn't cover the FX59 because the FX59 isn't gonna be released until later this year.

In a lot of the encoding benchmarks that were tested the AMDs come out ahead. But what is really impressive is that the dual core AMD beats out the dual core intel in every single encoding benchmark (except for lame mp3 encoding where it loses by only 5 seconds) and absolutely destroys it in games.

But I wouldn't hold my breath on AMD breaking 3.8GHz in the next year. They might get close but they won't get 3.8... the current world record for an overclocked AMD is something like 4GHz... and thats with phase change and not even close to stable.

__________________
3500+ Venice 0515 @ 2805MHz --- 1GB OCZ PC4000 VX @ 255MHz 2-2-2-5, 3.5v --- Leadtek 6800GT @ 415/1128
29.594s 1M superpi

Trader Rating: 0 · #42

July 28th, 2005, 04:14 PM

Pyro Monkey

<~~ This is why I'm hot

Join Date: Jan 2004

Location: <?php echo "At the console."; ?>

Posts: 7,274

Time spent in forums: 1 Month 3 h 40 m 16 sec
Reputation Power: 1363

Does AMD need to break 4 ghz? They still beat intel with lower core frequencies.

Trader Rating: 0 · #43

July 28th, 2005, 04:34 PM

wwwww

is the new lol

Join Date: Apr 2004

Location: Sydney, Australia

Posts: 4,152

Time spent in forums: 1 Week 5 Days 8 h 8 m 2 sec
Reputation Power: 1627

the record for a pentium M is around 4.1Ghz and they are faster per clock at short pipeline tests (gaming, general use), enough said

looks like things have changed, AMD beats Intel at encoding and Intel beats AMD at gaming, I'm surprised the X2 beat the Dual cored prescotts at encoding though...

Trader Rating: 0 · #44

July 28th, 2005, 04:36 PM

000

Join Date: Aug 2004

Posts: 3,488

Time spent in forums: 2 Weeks 2 Days 12 h 30 m 57 sec
Warnings Level: 20
Number of bans: 2
Reputation Power: 1141

AMD better at Intel at encoding. I could see that coming. I never thought I'd hear Intel beats AMD at gaming.

Trader Rating: 0 · #45

July 28th, 2005, 04:40 PM

wwwww

is the new lol

Join Date: Apr 2004

Location: Sydney, Australia

Posts: 4,152

Time spent in forums: 1 Week 5 Days 8 h 8 m 2 sec
Reputation Power: 1627

What do you mean? AMD hasn't had a better gaming CPU since the willamette vs those early XPs.

you know
northwood vs barton k7
dothan vs K8

but the X2 is 2x2.4GHz, the dual core prescott is 2x3.2Ghz at comparable clocks, we can use the entire pipeline with encoding, the prescott should win.

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes	Rate This Thread
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode	Rate This Thread: