Video Cards

  Home arrow Video Cards arrow Radeon 9600XT by ASUS Review
Watch our Tech Videos 
Dev Hardware Forums 
Computer Cases  
Computer Processors  
Computer Systems  
Digital Cameras  
Flat Panels  
Gaming  
Hardware Guides  
Hardware News  
Input Devices  
Memory  
Mobile Devices  
Motherboards  
Networking Hardware  
Opinions  
PC Cooling  
PC Speakers  
Peripherals  
Power Supply Units  
Software  
Sound Cards  
Storage Devices  
Tech Interviews  
User Experiences  
Video Cards  
Weekly Newsletter
 
Developer Updates  
Free Website Content 
 RSS  Articles
 RSS  Forums
 RSS  All Feeds
Write For Us 
Contact Us 
Site Map 
Privacy Policy 
Support 
 USERNAME
 
 PASSWORD
 
 
  >>> SIGN UP!  
  Lost Password? 
VIDEO CARDS

Radeon 9600XT by ASUS Review
By: Quantum Skyline
  • Search For More Articles!
  • Disclaimer
  • Author Terms
  • Rating: 4 stars4 stars4 stars4 stars4 stars / 31
    2004-02-23

    Table of Contents:
  • Radeon 9600XT by ASUS Review
  • Inside the Box and the Card
  • Extra Goodies!
  • Benchmarking
  • Performance Benchmarks
  • OpenGL Benchmarks
  • Video Game Benchmarks
  • Antialiasing and Anisotropic Filtering
  • Overclocking
  • Conclusion

  • Rate this Article: Poor Best 
      ADD THIS ARTICLE TO:
      Del.ici.ous Digg
      Blink Simpy
      Google Spurl
      Y! MyWeb Furl
    Email Me Similar Content When Posted
    Add Developer Shed Article Feed To Your Site
    Email Article To Friend
    Print Version Of Article
    PDF Version Of Article
     
     

    SEARCH DEV HARDWARE

    Radeon 9600XT by ASUS Review


    (Page 1 of 10 )

    Back in the old days of 700 MHz Athlons, the name Asus always brought out the same response: they make superb motherboards that can't be beat. They still have that reputation with the newer motherboards, especially the  P4P800  and the P4P800 Deluxe. Their video cards I had never heard of, so I was pleasantly surprised when I walked into Canada Computers and saw an ASUS Radeon 9600XT/TVD for under $300. It looked like a good midrange videocard, and it was based on a Radeon 9600 VPU which had sold out everywhere, so I was left asking "Am I getting a great deal or is this card a piece of garbage?" Or better yet, "should I pay the extra cash for a 9800XT?"

    Judging by the specifications available on the website, this card looks good, since it comes with.

    1. AGP 8x support, backwards compatible with AGP 4x and 2x specifications
    2. DirectX 9 and OpenGL 2.0 support
    3. 500 MHz engine clock speed, active cooler
    4. 128 MB DDR RAM at 300MHz (600 MHz effective) and a 128 MB memory interface
    5. Seven software packages plus a CD for drivers and utilities
    6. ATi's SMARTSHADER and SMOOTHVISION technologies for clear pictures and 16x anisotropic filtering and 8x anti-aliasing
    7. DVI/S-VHS output
    8. Dual-head support

    The Radeon 9600XT is based on ATi's RV360 chip, a 75 million transistor chip that is architecturally the same chip as the  RV350, found on the Radeon 9600 Pro and the ATi All-In-Wonder 9600.  Both were built on a 130 nm process.  The primary difference between the RV350 and the RV360 is how it is made - the RV360 is made with a new insulating material that allows for faster transistor switching. Faster transistor switching translates directly into faster clock speeds. I will discuss how much that helps with performance and overclocking this card later. As a result, the RV360 runs at a whopping 500 MHz, 20% faster than its cousin on the Radeon 9600 Pro.

    What is somewhat interesting is the differences among the different 9600 chips. Now that the 9700 and the 9500 are being phased out, consumers are left with three options: the budget Radeon 9200, the enthusiast Radeon 9800, and the mainstream 9600.  However, among the Radeon 9600 line, shoppers can choose between a Radeon 9600SE, a Radeon 9600, a Radeon 9600 Pro, and a Radeon 9600 XT.  ATi's descriptions of the chips make it appear that they are castrating the processor in the Radeon 9600SE, since it has an engine clock speed of 325 MHz and an effective memory speed of 400MHz.  Specs like that make you wonder how long the Radeon 9200 will last on the market since ATi might make FireGL take over the lower end of its graphics line.

    The memory on the card is Samsung K4D263238E-GC33, which is rated at 300 MHz, so ASUS gave me RAM already at its design limit.  That could pose a problem for overclocking the card later on, especially for the chips at the back of the card. I've never understood why they are never cooled, even with a small heatsink.

    More Video Cards Articles
    More By Quantum Skyline

    blog comments powered by Disqus

    VIDEO CARDS ARTICLES

    - Lucid Hydra 100
    - HIS HD 2600 Pro
    - BFG 8800 GT OC
    - nVidia 8600 GT
    - 8500 GT Video Card
    - MSI NX8600 GT
    - Folding to Cure on the Edge with GPUs
    - PowerColor X1300 512MB GameFX
    - PowerColor X800 GTO 128MB 256-bit Video Card...
    - Intel Blurs GPU, Preparing for a Vista Vs. V...
    - Rosewill X800 XL
    - Physics Processing Unit
    - Sapphire X300SE
    - Inno3D GeForce 6200A
    - Video Card Overclocking

    Developer Shed Affiliates

     




    © 2003-2014 by Developer Shed. All rights reserved. DS Cluster - Follow our Sitemap
    KEITHLEE2zdeconfigurator/configs/INFUSIONSOFT_OVERLAY.phpzdeconfigurator/configs/ OFFLOADING INFUSIONSOFTLOADING INFUSIONSOFT 1debug:overlay status: OFF
    overlay not displayed overlay cookie defined: TI_CAMPAIGN_1012_D OVERLAY COOKIE set:
    status off