Storage Devices

  Home arrow Storage Devices arrow Page 2 - RAID: Not Such a Clever Idea for Your ...
Watch our Tech Videos 
Dev Hardware Forums 
Computer Cases  
Computer Processors  
Computer Systems  
Digital Cameras  
Flat Panels  
Hardware Guides  
Hardware News  
Input Devices  
Mobile Devices  
Networking Hardware  
PC Cooling  
PC Speakers  
Power Supply Units  
Sound Cards  
Storage Devices  
Tech Interviews  
User Experiences  
Video Cards  
Weekly Newsletter
Developer Updates  
Free Website Content 
 RSS  Articles
 RSS  Forums
 RSS  All Feeds
Write For Us 
Contact Us 
Site Map 
Privacy Policy 
  >>> SIGN UP!  
  Lost Password? 

RAID: Not Such a Clever Idea for Your Home PC
By: Clinton
  • Search For More Articles!
  • Disclaimer
  • Author Terms
  • Rating: 2 stars2 stars2 stars2 stars2 stars / 71

    Table of Contents:
  • RAID: Not Such a Clever Idea for Your Home PC
  • Does Technology's Go-Faster Stripe Actually Add Speed?
  • RAID 1 - Give up the ghost?
  • Risky Array of Independent Disks
  • Protection and Recovery

  • Rate this Article: Poor Best 
      Del.ici.ous Digg
      Blink Simpy
      Google Spurl
      Y! MyWeb Furl
    Email Me Similar Content When Posted
    Add Developer Shed Article Feed To Your Site
    Email Article To Friend
    Print Version Of Article
    PDF Version Of Article


    RAID: Not Such a Clever Idea for Your Home PC - Does Technology's Go-Faster Stripe Actually Add Speed?

    (Page 2 of 5 )

    The issue with RAID 0 has always been that splitting data across two hard disks inevitably resulted in doubling the chances of data loss via hard disk failure. It is the logical downside to a single striped volume spanning two physical drives that if either disk fails no data is recoverable. The risk rises as more drives are added to the array. Don't let the "R" in RAID mislead -- in a RAID 0 configuration there is no redundancy.

    Associated with a higher risk of data loss RAID 0's only attraction remained its perceived faster speed, and faster speeds are always welcome. It had long been the gripe of video editors that standard hard disks weren't fast enough for video. When technology improvements like higher spindle speeds, larger caches, Tagged Command Queuing (TCQ) etc. brought phenomenal speed increases to the storage arena video editors complained that speeds still weren't sufficient for advanced video work and the handling of higher quality footage - like 10 bit video. Video isn't the only application that takes all the speed that's thrown at it and asks for more. Lots of other applications could use more speed from the IDE subsystem. Since storage speed improvements just haven't matched improvements in other areas like CPUs and GPUs -- and disk reading and writing is still the bottleneck in most modern PCs -- SIs, VARs and even home PC users having been flocking to the technological amphetamine that is RAID 0 instead of spending some time learning how they can optimize their hard disk performance.

    What made striping even more attractive was the scalability of the technology. In theory throughput keeps getting faster and faster just by adding more drives to an array.

    But very little of that is true. RAID 0 does not always make for more speed. In fact striping may not make the blindest bit of difference to the speed of the average home PC!

    Reputed technical websites like StorageReview have often commented that gains on RAID 0 vs single hard disk are minimal at best. Test after test by some of the most reputed technical websites have proved that RAID 0 does not significantly improve desktop performance. Not even with the far higher risk of a four disk RAID 0 array. Seriously! Very few home users tend to be aware of all these technical studies and those that do very often pooh-pooh the idea that the RAID configuration they spent a lot of money on is not actually running faster.

    If the claim that RAID 0 is not all it's cracked up to be sounds illogical then it's worth taking the time to read the reviews. A search in Google should lead you to them. Except for a few limited high I/O activities like video editing -- and the typical application benchmark -- the speed gains are almost non-existent. For the average PC user RAID 0 is as useful as a rear spoiler on an 800cc car. It looks good, it sounds impressive but it don't do nuffin'.

    RAID 0 has been striped (pun apologies) of its only virtue, speed. If striping increases risk of data loss but provides no speed gains worth writing home about -- why is it still so popular? Well, myths are not easily dispelled. Marketing gumph designed to sell motherboards with RAID still boast about massive speed gains to be achieved. Hard disk retailers would rather sell two disks than one. And there's always product differentiation -- our PC is faster because it has RAID. Users are rarely told the other risks because risk warnings don't shift stock.

    Other risks? Yes, there are other risks. Isn't drive failure considered not a very likely mishap? The other risks are even bigger monsters and take the risk-reward ratio firmly toward not using RAID. But hardly anyone seems to know about these risks so they don't get discussed often. More later...

    More Storage Devices Articles
    More By Clinton

    blog comments powered by Disqus


    - The Rise of Purpose-Built Backup Appliances
    - Why Are Customers Deploying Purpose-Built Ba...
    - TrueCrypt: Free, On-the-Fly Disk Encryption
    - Bootable Rescue Flash Drives
    - Operating Systems on Bootable Flash Drives
    - Shopping For External Storage
    - How to Flash Your BIOS with Flash Drives
    - Flash Drive Booting Fundamentals
    - Freecom Media Player 450 WLAN
    - Mobile Computing Technologies: an Overview
    - Throwing a Glance at Solid State Drives
    - Soyo SlimEX Platinum Review
    - Setting Up Your USB Storage Device as a Port...
    - Network Storage for the Home with the D-Link...
    - Netgear SC101 Network Attached Storage for t...

    Developer Shed Affiliates


    © 2003-2019 by Developer Shed. All rights reserved. DS Cluster - Follow our Sitemap
    KEITHLEE2zdeconfigurator/configs/INFUSIONSOFT_OVERLAY.phpzdeconfigurator/configs/ OFFLOADING INFUSIONSOFTLOADING INFUSIONSOFT 1debug:overlay status: OFF
    overlay not displayed overlay cookie defined: TI_CAMPAIGN_1012_D OVERLAY COOKIE set:
    status off