Software
  Home arrow Software arrow Page 2 - SuSE Linux 9.1 Review
Dev Hardware Forums 
Computer Cases  
Computer Processors  
Computer Systems  
Digital Cameras  
Flat Panels  
Gaming  
Hardware Guides  
Hardware News  
Input Devices  
Memory  
Mobile Devices  
Motherboards  
Networking Hardware  
Opinions  
PC Cooling  
PC Speakers  
Peripherals  
Power Supply Units  
Software  
Sound Cards  
Storage Devices  
Tech Interviews  
User Experiences  
Video Cards  
Mobile Linux 
APP Generation ROI 
IBM® developerWorks 
Weekly Newsletter
 
Developer Updates  
Free Website Content 
 RSS  Articles
 RSS  Forums
 RSS  All Feeds
Write For Us Get Paid 
Request Media Kit
Contact Us 
Site Map 
Privacy Policy 
Support 
 USERNAME
 
 PASSWORD
 
 
  >>> SIGN UP!  
  Lost Password? 
SOFTWARE

SuSE Linux 9.1 Review
By: Quantum Skyline
  • Search For More Articles!
  • Disclaimer
  • Author Terms
  • Rating: 5 stars5 stars5 stars5 stars5 stars / 26
    2004-09-20

    Table of Contents:
  • SuSE Linux 9.1 Review
  • Installation
  • Configuration
  • Using SuSE Linux 9.1
  • Conclusion

  • Rate this Article: Poor Best 
      ADD THIS ARTICLE TO:
      Del.ici.ous Digg
      Blink Simpy
      Google Spurl
      Y! MyWeb Furl
    Email Me Similar Content When Posted
    Add Developer Shed Article Feed To Your Site
    Email Article To Friend
    Print Version Of Article
    PDF Version Of Article
     
     
    ADVERTISEMENT


    SuSE Linux 9.1 Review - Installation


    (Page 2 of 5 )

    SuSE Linux uses its own homegrown setup tool for installation and configuration – YaST. YaST, which stands for Yet another Setup Tool, is in its second version in this incarnation and looks very nice. Where Mandrake 10 and Fedora will make you go through different steps in a wizard-like fashion, YaST2 gives you all of your configurations in one screen.

    SUSE Linux 9.1 Review

    Its hard to tell how well the average user will find this installer. I really like the fact that all the configuration options are all in one place, but its not obvious to the user to click on the headings in order to change settings. Using columns would also help, since its easy to go through this installer a few times and didn't notice the scroll bar on the right side, which configures X Windows. Having said that, once you figure out how to use YaST2, the rest is easy. The partitioning options are well thought out, and reasonably simple. (Granted, partitioning is not easy for those who don't use it.) YaST2 did recommend ReiserFS as the default filesystem, and detected my Windows XP partition and by FAT32 backup partition on my second drive without problems. SuSE also doesn't mount the FAT or NTFS partitions it finds under /mnt like most distributions do – instead, it uses /windows/c, /windows/d, and so on for them. The CD writer and DVD drives were automatically mounted at /media/cdrecorder and /media/dvd, also different from the standard /mnt/cdrom and /mnt/cdrom1.

    SUSE Linux 9.1 Review

    The package managing component of the install is similar to those found in other distributions. Be forewarned: the auto-dependency check is not turned on by default. I tried to install everything (an 11 GB adventure) only to turn on dependency checking and find that 53 packages were conflicting. The DVD appears to have multiple versions of the same software on it, and as a result, the conflicts were appearing. Dependency checking, if its an option, should be turned on by default, and unlike the Fedora installer, an afterthought when it brings up a message saying “Hey! Did you know you also need packages X, Y, and Z?” I eventually opted for installing all of KDE and GNOME, as well as other packages such as samba, which turned out to 4.3 GB.

    When the command to install was given, YaST2 happily formatted and partitioned my drive. Installing the bootloader choked. Having modified the bootloader settings to use LILO instead of GRUB, the lilo.conf that YaST2 generated caused LILO to fail because there was a space in one of the labels. Since LILO does not like spaces in its configuration files at all, LILO failed and generated a non-descriptive error message. While its easy to assume that the average user will not change the bootloader from LILO to GRUB, the default label should be compatible with both LILO and GRUB.

    SUSE Linux 9.1 Review

    The copy time was about 45 minutes, and overall, the installation took about 1 hour. Aside from the bootloader problem, it went without a hitch.

    More Software Articles
    More By Quantum Skyline


       · Very thorough review, QS. Top notch quality from you as always.
     

    SOFTWARE ARTICLES

    - Google Voice Encounters Problems Early On
    - Interpreting HiJackThis Logs in Windows XP
    - Introduction to HiJackThis for Windows XP
    - An Overview of Virtualization Solutions
    - GNS3: Graphical Network Simulator
    - Nero Liquid TV
    - Bookmarking Application TidyFavorites Pro
    - Broadcast Live Video From Your Cell Phone Us...
    - Top Ten Productivity Apps for the iPhone and...
    - The GIMP 2.6 vs. Photoshop Smackdown
    - All About Emulators: Re-Visiting the Ghost o...
    - Mass Internet Faxing Services
    - Dropbox: No-Nonsense Online Storage
    - Top 6 Web-Based Email Applications
    - Bundled Software: Reward or Burden?






    © 2003-2009 by Developer Shed. All rights reserved. DS Cluster 2 Hosted by Hostway
    For more Enterprise Application Development news, visit eWeek