Opinions

  Home arrow Opinions arrow Page 4 - The Year of the CPU
Dev Hardware Forums 
Computer Cases  
Computer Processors  
Computer Systems  
Digital Cameras  
Flat Panels  
Gaming  
Hardware Guides  
Hardware News  
Input Devices  
Memory  
Mobile Devices  
Motherboards  
Networking Hardware  
Opinions  
PC Cooling  
PC Speakers  
Peripherals  
Power Supply Units  
Software  
Sound Cards  
Storage Devices  
Tech Interviews  
User Experiences  
Video Cards  
Weekly Newsletter
 
Developer Updates  
Free Website Content 
 RSS  Articles
 RSS  Forums
 RSS  All Feeds
Write For Us Get Paid 
Request Media Kit
Contact Us 
Site Map 
Privacy Policy 
Support 
 USERNAME
 
 PASSWORD
 
 
  >>> SIGN UP!  
  Lost Password? 
OPINIONS

The Year of the CPU
By: jkabaseball
  • Search For More Articles!
  • Disclaimer
  • Author Terms
  • Rating: 2 stars2 stars2 stars2 stars2 stars / 20
    2005-05-11

    Table of Contents:
  • The Year of the CPU
  • Intel's Dual Core Plans
  • AMD's Dual Core Plans
  • Performance

  • Rate this Article: Poor Best 
      ADD THIS ARTICLE TO:
      Del.ici.ous Digg
      Blink Simpy
      Google Spurl
      Y! MyWeb Furl
    Email Me Similar Content When Posted
    Add Developer Shed Article Feed To Your Site
    Email Article To Friend
    Print Version Of Article
    PDF Version Of Article
     
     

    SEARCH DEV HARDWARE

    TOOLS YOU CAN USE

    advertisement

    The Year of the CPU - Performance


    (Page 4 of 4 )

    We should see a nice bump up in the performance of dual core. Most applications haven’t been compiled for use with dual CPUs, so don’t expect any gains in this department. You will see a big jump in programs that have been previously written for dual CPUs. Many multimedia programs support dual core, and there will be a good bump up for the new CPUs compared to their single core brothers. 

    If you don’t use any multimedia applications, all is not lost for you. The good thing about having two cores is that you can currently assign programs to certain cores. For example, you can encode a DVD on one core and assign gaming to the other. You should notice little difference from gaming on single core without encoding a DVD. Hopefully games and other applications that are coming out in the future will be written and compiled for multiple cores.

    Is it hot in here?

    I know that the first time I heard Intel was going to throw two Prescott cores into one CPU, I shook my head wondering how they were thinking of cooling it. Even the single core Prescott had bad thermal problems on stock coolers, so twice as many cores would really be a major problem.  From the specs I’ve seen, heat isn’t as much as a problem as it could have been. Intel has scaled back the speed and volts, which helps with the problem. The stock cooler is a little beefier and manages to cool it. 

    The next year

    As cool as 2005 looks for the CPU, 2006 will follow, but with less invention, and more production. 2005 will see brand new things for CPUs, but a majority of people won’t jump onto the dual core wagon until 2006. In 2006 we will see prices fall, and speeds bump up. Intel will also move more chips over to dual core. 

    The one I’m really looking forward to is the dual core Pentium Mobile. It will also add 64-bit and move to a faster FSB. Currently the Pentium Mobile, when overclocked, can compete with the very best chips, such as the EE and AMD’s FX line. 

    Conclusion

    As unexciting as the recent years have been for CPUs, this year will be full of great inventions. Thus far, Intel has released a lot more information about their dual core CPUs than AMD. The results look surprisingly good. Until games and other applications are made with support for multiple CPUs, dual cores will be strictly for multimedia and multitasking. Once the software comes out, dual core will take off. At any rate, I would hold off on jumping the gun and buying a new CPU. Let the dust settle. The winner will come out on top, and then you can use those shiny pennies you have saved up.


    DISCLAIMER: The content provided in this article is not warranted or guaranteed by Developer Shed, Inc. The content provided is intended for entertainment and/or educational purposes in order to introduce to the reader key ideas, concepts, and/or product reviews. As such it is incumbent upon the reader to employ real-world tactics for security and implementation of best practices. We are not liable for any negative consequences that may result from implementing any information covered in our articles or tutorials. If this is a hardware review, it is not recommended to open and/or modify your hardware.
    blog comments powered by Disqus

    OPINIONS ARTICLES

    - The Top Tech Successes for 2011
    - Kindle DX versus Nook Color
    - Top Tech for 2011
    - New Exascale Supercomputer Set to Change the...
    - IT Inventory and Resource Management with OC...
    - Blizzard Forum Users Can Say Goodbye to Thei...
    - iPhone 4 Issue: Apple, Can You Hear Us Now?
    - Here`s Your Flying Car
    - Hardware News of Note
    - WorldLenns Hints at Wider Vision
    - Make Electronics: Learning By Discovery Book...
    - Opening Highlights of the Apple Worldwide De...
    - MakerFaire 2010: the State Fair for Mad Scie...
    - Broadcasters Come Together in the Name of Mo...
    - Apple`s Influence on Thin Design



    © 2003-2012 by Developer Shed. All rights reserved. DS Cluster 5 - Follow our Sitemap
    KEITHLEE2/home/servers/www.devhardware.com/www/zdeconfigurator/configs/INFUSIONSOFT_OVERLAY.php/home/servers/www.devhardware.com/www/zdeconfigurator/configs/ OFFLOADING INFUSIONSOFTLOADING INFUSIONSOFT 1debug:overlay status: OFF
    overlay not displayed overlay cookie defined: TI_CAMPAIGN_1012_D OVERLAY COOKIE set:
    status off