Opinions
  Home arrow Opinions arrow Page 5 - Dell: to Hell and Back Again?
Dev Hardware Forums 
Computer Cases  
Computer Processors  
Computer Systems  
Digital Cameras  
Flat Panels  
Gaming  
Hardware Guides  
Hardware News  
Input Devices  
Memory  
Mobile Devices  
Motherboards  
Networking Hardware  
Opinions  
PC Cooling  
PC Speakers  
Peripherals  
Power Supply Units  
Software  
Sound Cards  
Storage Devices  
Tech Interviews  
User Experiences  
Video Cards  
Mobile Linux 
APP Generation ROI 
IBM® developerWorks 
Weekly Newsletter
 
Developer Updates  
Free Website Content 
 RSS  Articles
 RSS  Forums
 RSS  All Feeds
Write For Us Get Paid 
Request Media Kit
Contact Us 
Site Map 
Privacy Policy 
Support 
 USERNAME
 
 PASSWORD
 
 
  >>> SIGN UP!  
  Lost Password? 
OPINIONS

Dell: to Hell and Back Again?
By: Remco Degooyer
  • Search For More Articles!
  • Disclaimer
  • Author Terms
  • Rating: 4 stars4 stars4 stars4 stars4 stars / 6
    2007-02-26

    Table of Contents:
  • Dell: to Hell and Back Again?
  • The Efficiency Challenge
  • Hardware Issues
  • Too Little, Too Late?
  • Changes Needed

  • Rate this Article: Poor Best 
      ADD THIS ARTICLE TO:
      Del.ici.ous Digg
      Blink Simpy
      Google Spurl
      Y! MyWeb Furl
    Email Me Similar Content When Posted
    Add Developer Shed Article Feed To Your Site
    Email Article To Friend
    Print Version Of Article
    PDF Version Of Article
     
     
    ADVERTISEMENT


    Dell: to Hell and Back Again? - Changes Needed


    (Page 5 of 5 )



    A great deal of speculation surrounds Dell's growth into the server and storage markets but its ultimate success may lie in reversing its years of cost cutting.

    Dell's greatest strength still lies in its negative cash flow cycle, which allows it a great deal of latitude in producing complete computer systems at incredibly low cost. A significant investment is required in improving its after-sale support and more generous basic warranty. In an attempt to understand its customers and restore their faith, Dell must take back control of its outsourced call centers. Within the dynamic of employing outsourced contractors, the call center requires call volume to achieve profitability. The inverse result of this is the lack of satisfactory first-time resolution for the customer because multiple callbacks to resolve the same issue are encouraged rather than discouraged in order for the call center to, itself, make higher revenues, because they are paid by the call not the issue.

    Invariably this does mean significant time and money must be spent to bring these call centers back to North America rather than abroad. However, the international call centers provide the existing infrastructure for continued growth in the emerging world, and with Dell's ability to produce these same computer systems without the same amount of long distance shipping from its Asia-based suppliers, it can make a real push into the emerging world with low-cost computer systems with a customer base untouched by the negative publicity it has generated in the North American market.

    Alienware, on the other hand, needs to take further advantage of the Dell efficiency model, but rather than provide the same off-the-shelf component production that Dell traditionally does, it needs to focus on innovation and product development. By using Alienware as its own research and development arm, Dell can gain unparalleled knowledge of these technologies first hand for later implementation into their primary systems. Allow Alienware to be true to its longstanding loyal customer base by continuing to provide true "bleeding edge" equipment meant to attract the more sophisticated consumer that is unlikely to purchase a regular Dell system.

    Dell has the ability to rebound and rebuild from these multiple debacles, but Michael Dell is not Steve Jobs. The presentation of Dell as some sort of messiah for the manufacturing giant is a misconception as Dell is not an innovator but rather an improver. He clearly proved that he can develop manufacturing methods to within a razor's edge of perfect efficiency, but Dell Computers Inc is not known as a leading edge innovator in design and in bringing new ideas to market. Rather they are known for taking an existing product and producing it in unparalleled capacities and scale.

    Dell's best bet is in what he knows best: build the cheapest computer possible with strong after-sale support and reestablish the relationship with the general purchasing public that has been damaged in the past several years.


    DISCLAIMER: The content provided in this article is not warranted or guaranteed by Developer Shed, Inc. The content provided is intended for entertainment and/or educational purposes in order to introduce to the reader key ideas, concepts, and/or product reviews. As such it is incumbent upon the reader to employ real-world tactics for security and implementation of best practices. We are not liable for any negative consequences that may result from implementing any information covered in our articles or tutorials. If this is a hardware review, it is not recommended to open and/or modify your hardware.

       · What do you think? Can Dell rebound from these multiple disasters and return to its...
     

    OPINIONS ARTICLES

    - Apple TV 3.0
    - Five Highly Anticipated Gadgets and Software...
    - Kindle Crumbling?
    - Car Audio Technology
    - Online Virtual Computers
    - Radio IP Software`s Mobile VPN Technology
    - Ventrilo: The Best in VoIP?
    - Entrust SSL VPN Certificates Streamline Secu...
    - Spiceworks 4.0 Free IT Management Software R...
    - Google`s Newest Service: Google Voice
    - Google Chrome Operating System
    - The Panasonic TC-P50V10: A Second Glance
    - Panasonic TC-P50V10
    - Online Recycling
    - Blu-ray versus Streaming






    © 2003-2009 by Developer Shed. All rights reserved. DS Cluster 6 Hosted by Hostway
    For more Enterprise Application Development news, visit eWeek