Opinions
  Home arrow Opinions arrow Page 2 - 10 Things Microsoft Could Learn from A...
Dev Hardware Forums 
Computer Cases  
Computer Processors  
Computer Systems  
Digital Cameras  
Flat Panels  
Gaming  
Hardware Guides  
Hardware News  
Input Devices  
Memory  
Mobile Devices  
Motherboards  
Networking Hardware  
Opinions  
PC Cooling  
PC Speakers  
Peripherals  
Power Supply Units  
Software  
Sound Cards  
Storage Devices  
Tech Interviews  
User Experiences  
Video Cards  
Mobile Linux 
APP Generation ROI 
IBM® developerWorks 
Weekly Newsletter
 
Developer Updates  
Free Website Content 
 RSS  Articles
 RSS  Forums
 RSS  All Feeds
Write For Us Get Paid 
Request Media Kit
Contact Us 
Site Map 
Privacy Policy 
Support 
 USERNAME
 
 PASSWORD
 
 
  >>> SIGN UP!  
  Lost Password? 
OPINIONS

10 Things Microsoft Could Learn from Apple
By: jkabaseball
  • Search For More Articles!
  • Disclaimer
  • Author Terms
  • Rating: 5 stars5 stars5 stars5 stars5 stars / 1
    2008-10-30

    Table of Contents:
  • 10 Things Microsoft Could Learn from Apple
  • Development and Public Relations Approaches
  • Get with the Times!
  • Finishing Touches

  • Rate this Article: Poor Best 
      ADD THIS ARTICLE TO:
      Del.ici.ous Digg
      Blink Simpy
      Google Spurl
      Y! MyWeb Furl
    Email Me Similar Content When Posted
    Add Developer Shed Article Feed To Your Site
    Email Article To Friend
    Print Version Of Article
    PDF Version Of Article
     
     
    ADVERTISEMENT


    10 Things Microsoft Could Learn from Apple - Development and Public Relations Approaches


    (Page 2 of 4 )



    3) Development approaches -- OS X and Windows were developed in two different ways, and I think most people would prefer Apple's approach. They have been tweaking OS X for years now. Every year or two they come out with a new revision of it with some new features and upgrades. This keeps people that are familiar with the OS in a happy place where they know where everything is and how everything works. I like to think of these upgrades as major service packs, with more features than Microsoft puts into its service packs.

    Microsoft's approach is to build a totally new OS every 3-5 years. This gives people a new look for their PC, but headaches for IT people and even consumers. Both XP and OS X weren't liked until their second releases (SP2 and 10.2). By that time the third party applications had been ironed out and the OS had become a solid, dependable environment. From this point on, OS X continues to build on this solid ground, but Microsoft goes a different direction. It decides to build a totally new OS, and start the climb up the ladder again. 

    Many people complain about Windows being buggy and not stable, but the same was true for OS X. Microsoft just likes to get a new OS once things get solid for the old OS. If Microsoft sticks to Vista for 10 years, it will be golden. You can throw in a few free service packs, and maybe even some fee-based ones like Apple does. If things get to boring, instead of throwing a new kernel into the mix, how about a few new themes? Stick to a core OS and continue to build upon it for a decent amount of time.

    4) Hush Hush -  This might be a little harder for Microsoft to do, but it should try to keep its products a little more closed than Vista was. I know that a large beta means that millions of different computer systems try the software, but you end up killing the surprise that people get when they see the shiny new OS on the screen. 

    Perhaps if Microsoft kept the XP GUI until it went gold, but still had all the Vista features, it might have been different. Microsoft had Vista the shipping its GUI back in Beta 2, and it wasn't much of a surprise for people that wanted to go buy Vista. 

    Apple keeps its products hush hush. There is a small beta group for 10.5.4 and there aren't any sneak peaks at it now. I guess this point can go back to the issues of hardware support and updating an OS vs. starting over; fewer differences in machines means there is less testing needed.



    5) Mac Ad Counter Attack - We have all seen those "Hello I'm a PC and I'm a Mac" ads. Microsoft, you need to launch a counter attack now. What kind of company is going to sit there and take shot after shot and not respond?

    Microsoft needs to get some ads that show us that the PC is still alive and kicking, and heck, how about a few ads similar to Apple's ads on what a PC can do that a Mac can't?  If I wasn't into computers as much as I am, I might think a Mac can do everything a PC can and more. 

    More Opinions Articles
    More By jkabaseball


     

    OPINIONS ARTICLES

    - Apple TV 3.0
    - Five Highly Anticipated Gadgets and Software...
    - Kindle Crumbling?
    - Car Audio Technology
    - Online Virtual Computers
    - Radio IP Software`s Mobile VPN Technology
    - Ventrilo: The Best in VoIP?
    - Entrust SSL VPN Certificates Streamline Secu...
    - Spiceworks 4.0 Free IT Management Software R...
    - Google`s Newest Service: Google Voice
    - Google Chrome Operating System
    - The Panasonic TC-P50V10: A Second Glance
    - Panasonic TC-P50V10
    - Online Recycling
    - Blu-ray versus Streaming






    © 2003-2009 by Developer Shed. All rights reserved. DS Cluster 5 Hosted by Hostway
    For more Enterprise Application Development news, visit eWeek