Home arrow Motherboards arrow Page 5 - Abit NF7-S Review
Watch our Tech Videos 
Dev Hardware Forums 
Computer Cases  
Computer Processors  
Computer Systems  
Digital Cameras  
Flat Panels  
Hardware Guides  
Hardware News  
Input Devices  
Mobile Devices  
Networking Hardware  
PC Cooling  
PC Speakers  
Power Supply Units  
Sound Cards  
Storage Devices  
Tech Interviews  
User Experiences  
Video Cards  
Weekly Newsletter
Developer Updates  
Free Website Content 
 RSS  Articles
 RSS  Forums
 RSS  All Feeds
Write For Us 
Contact Us 
Site Map 
Privacy Policy 
  >>> SIGN UP!  
  Lost Password? 

Abit NF7-S Review
By: Jim Miller
  • Search For More Articles!
  • Disclaimer
  • Author Terms
  • Rating: 4 stars4 stars4 stars4 stars4 stars / 14

    Table of Contents:
  • Abit NF7-S Review
  • ABIT NF7-S Review
  • Abit NF7-S Review
  • Abit NF7-S Review
  • Abit NF7-S Review
  • Abit NF7-S Review

  • Rate this Article: Poor Best 
      Del.ici.ous Digg
      Blink Simpy
      Google Spurl
      Y! MyWeb Furl
    Email Me Similar Content When Posted
    Add Developer Shed Article Feed To Your Site
    Email Article To Friend
    Print Version Of Article
    PDF Version Of Article


    Abit NF7-S Review - Abit NF7-S Review

    (Page 5 of 6 )


    Product:ABIT NF7-S Rev 1.2 Motherboard





    Reviewed By:

    Jim "Justi" Miller

    Review Date:

    April 2003

    Abit NF7-S Rev 1.2 Motherboard Review


    Benchmarks Contiued...


    Memory Bandwidth:



    Image Not Available

    NF7 (Maxtor ATA100)

    NF7 (Maxtor SATA ATA150)KD7-RAID Maxtor ATA100)


    Now here are some results that are impressive, albeit rather surprising. After seeing the rather average results obtained in our review of the Seagate SATA drive, my expectations of the Serial ATA performance were rather low. What we see instead is that the new DiamondMax Plus 9 160GB SATA drive by maxtor, mixed with the NF7-S Rev 1.2's on board SATA controller provided by Silicon Image is more than impressive! While still not rivaling a RAID configuration, it's not too damn far away.

    Serial ATA is rapidly making it's way main stream, and as drivers develop I can only assume that will accelerate even more. The SATA drive was easy to install, and the smaller cable was certainly a nice change! I'll save my in-depth opinions of this for the Maxtor SATA drive coming up soon, but let's just say that I'll let the numbers posted above tell the story.


    PiFast Pi Calculation:

    This benchmark actually requires a little bit of explanation. Pifast measures basically the CPU's raw performance. Pifast does exactly what it says it does, it calculates Pi. Obviously, the lower the time the better the score. What I was interested in seeing here was if the motherboard chipset would make a difference, and then if the memory configuration in the nForce board would change anything. We used the options as laid out below:

    Program : PiFast version 4.2, by Xavier Gourdon
    Computation of 10000000 digits of Pi
    Method used : Chudnovsky
    Size of FFT : 1024 K
    Physical memory used : ~ 61355 K
    Disk memory used : ~ 0.00 Meg

    Here are the results:



    Wow, that's actually a pretty sizeable jump in the grand scheme of things. For the same memory and same CPU, a full 5 second jump is pretty significant. I reran these numbers several times to ensure accuracy, but give or take a few tenths here or there, the numbers were as shown above every time. I cannot explain to you WHY the nForce chipset performed better, but only that it did. That, is a good thing!


    PCMark 2002:



    We see the nForce flex just a wee bit of muscle here. Nothing substantial but a noticeable jump all the same. The one result that left me baffled was the HDD score on the KD7 board. In all other hard drive benchmarks the KD7 performed on par with the NF7, but for whatever reason in PCMark 2002 there was a distinctive edge for the NF7. That said, these are synthetic benchmarks and obviously should be taken as such.


    3DMark 2001 (Build 330):



    We realize that this is now outdated with the recent release of 3DMark2003, but with it's standings in the industry wanted to include is all the same. The numbers pretty clearly tell the story. While there is a SLIGHT increase with the nForce board, nothing earth shaking here.



    3DMark 2003:

    Before any of you write in to say it, yes, we are aware of the controversy that is floating around about this application. That said, considering we are comparing identical processors and video cards, changing really only the motherboard chipset, we felt it may be a value add to this review..



    As we suspected, no real difference here. The Ti4200 (utilizing the 41.09's by the way) is not exactly designed to crunch this application. All the same, we ran it on curiosity alone and figured we'd show you the numbers since we took the time to gather the data.


    Let's head to page 6 to talk about what I KNOW you're wanting to hear, OVERCLOCKING!! Then we'll wrap this up..


    More Motherboards Articles
    More By Jim Miller

    blog comments powered by Disqus


    - Intel Exiting PC Motherboard Business
    - Intel Nehalem Boards Compared
    - ABIT Fatal1ty F-I90HD
    - Intel Media Series DG33TL
    - Biostar TA690G
    - EVGA 680i LT SLI
    - ASUS P5N-E SLI
    - Biostar TForce TF570 SLI
    - ABIT IP35-E
    - EPoX EP-AT690G Pro Motherboard Review
    - EPoX EP-8U1697-GLI Motherboard
    - EPoX EP-9U1697-GLi Motherboard Review
    - Foxconn 955X7AA, Intel LGA 775 Motherboard R...
    - PC Partner ATI Xpress 200 Review
    - Foxconn Winfast NF4SK8AA-8EKRS Motherboard R...

    Developer Shed Affiliates


    © 2003-2018 by Developer Shed. All rights reserved. DS Cluster - Follow our Sitemap
    KEITHLEE2zdeconfigurator/configs/INFUSIONSOFT_OVERLAY.phpzdeconfigurator/configs/ OFFLOADING INFUSIONSOFTLOADING INFUSIONSOFT 1debug:overlay status: OFF
    overlay not displayed overlay cookie defined: TI_CAMPAIGN_1012_D OVERLAY COOKIE set:
    status off