Memory
  Home arrow Memory arrow Page 4 - Corsair TWINX1024-4400 Memory Review
Dev Hardware Forums 
Computer Cases  
Computer Processors  
Computer Systems  
Digital Cameras  
Flat Panels  
Hardware Guides  
Hardware News  
Input Devices  
Memory  
Mobile Devices  
Motherboards  
Networking Hardware  
Opinions  
PC Cooling  
PC Gaming  
PC Speakers  
Peripherals  
Power Supply Units  
Software  
Sound Cards  
Storage Devices  
Tech Interviews  
User Experiences  
Video Cards  
Mobile Linux 
APP Generation ROI 
IBM® developerWorks 
Sun Developer Network 
Weekly Newsletter
 
Developer Updates  
Free Website Content 
 RSS  Articles
 RSS  Forums
 RSS  All Feeds
Write For Us Get Paid 
Request Media Kit
Contact Us 
Site Map 
Privacy Policy 
Support 
 USERNAME
 
 PASSWORD
 
 
  >>> SIGN UP!  
  Lost Password? 
MEMORY

Corsair TWINX1024-4400 Memory Review
By: Memphist0
  • Search For More Articles!
  • Disclaimer
  • Author Terms
  • Rating: 5 stars5 stars5 stars5 stars5 stars / 50
    2004-02-04

    Table of Contents:
  • Corsair TWINX1024-4400 Memory Review
  • Specifications
  • Testing
  • Benchmarks: Video Games
  • Keep in Mind...
  • Conclusion

  • Rate this Article: Poor Best 
      ADD THIS ARTICLE TO:
      Del.ici.ous Digg
      Blink Simpy
      Google Spurl
      Y! MyWeb Furl
    Email Me Similar Content When Posted
    Add Developer Shed Article Feed To Your Site
    Email Article To Friend
    Print Version Of Article
    PDF Version Of Article
     
     
    ADVERTISEMENT


    Corsair TWINX1024-4400 Memory Review - Benchmarks: Video Games


    (Page 4 of 6 )

    Comanche4

    Comanche4

    Commanche4 is an older benchmark and isn't useful for video card benchmarks any longer, but still does a good job of measuring system performance, since the video card is no longer the bottleneck. The 284 FSB 5:4 setting manages a pretty sizeable margin of victory by 2.5% over the 270 FSB 1:1 setting.

     

    Aquamark

    Aquamark

    Aquamark v3.0 is another new benchmark that really stresses the video card in you system. Unlike 3DMark2003, Aquamark is based on a real game engine, so in theory, it should give us a better view of what running the system at the various settings. We do see the 270 FSB 5:4 fall ever so slightly behind the 270 FSB 1:1 settings. The amazing thing is how close all the scores are to each other. The scoring for this benchmark is done by taking the average frame rates during the testing period. So running at 270 FSB 1:1 gets an average frame rate of 44.719, and the 270 FSB 5:4 setting is 44.362 frames per second. The difference between the scores would in no way be noticeable in game play.

     

    Unreal Tournament 2003

    UT2k3

    Unreal Tournament 2003 has become a great gaming benchmark. It unmistakably is based on a real and popular game engine utilizing DirectX 8, and odds are most readers have at least played the demo. I first ran the benchmark at 640x480 to limit the effects of the video card on the test results. Here I concentrated primarily on the average frame rates in the center of the graph.  The 284 FSB 5:4 setting won by about 1.5 frames per second but the more interesting thing is to see the 270 FSB 5:4 setting average over 4 frames per second lower than the 270 FSB 1:1 setting. Clearly Unreal Tournament 2003 prefers the extra memory bandwidth. 

    UT2k3

    The next test was run at 1024x768 to represent the video settings that you may actually run while playing the game.  I was very surprised to see the average frame rates nearly identical to the average frame rates run at 640x480.  We still see the 284 FSB 5:4 setting in the lead but by a little less than it was at 640x480.  The 270 FSB 5:4 setting still is behind the 1:1 ratio by a little over 4 frames per second.

    More Memory Articles
    More By Memphist0


     

    MEMORY ARTICLES

    - MetaRAM
    - Cruzer Micro Flash Drive Review
    - Crucial Ballistix DDR2 Memory
    - G Skill F2-6400CL5d-2GBNQ
    - OCZ Gold XTC DDR2
    - Chip News Roundup
    - OCZ Platinum Edition PC2-4200 EB
    - Patriot Dual Channel 2GB DDR 500 (PC 4000) R...
    - Corsair XMS Pro PC3200c2 2GB Review
    - Geil Ultra X PC3200 BH5
    - OCZ Gold 2-2-2
    - Wintec AmpX PC2 5400 Review
    - OCZ Platinum PC4800
    - OCZ Booster
    - OCZ Voltage eXtreme

     
    Best Practices for Windows Vista Migration Presentation
    Dell and Microsoft recently held a series of face-to-face seminars entitled, &qu....

     
    Creating a Culture for Code Reuse
    If you oversee development teams you know that like it or not proprietary and ex....

     
    Keys to Web Application Acceleration: Advances in Delivery Systems
    Accelerate Web apps by up to 5x. Ensure significantly faster access to the Web a....

     
    Optimizing Application Monitoring
    Tired of finding out from your customers that you're offline? This white paper e....

     
    Solaris to Solaris Migration -- Migrating applications from Sun SPARC to Dell PowerEdge R900
    This comprehensive Migration Guide reviews the approach that Principled Technolo....

     





    © 2003-2009 by Developer Shed. All rights reserved. DS Cluster 4 hosted by Hostway
    Stay green...Green IT