Computer Processors
  Home arrow Computer Processors arrow Page 3 - Intel Pentium 4 3.0C 800MHz FSB
Dev Hardware Forums 
Computer Cases  
Computer Processors  
Computer Systems  
Digital Cameras  
Flat Panels  
Hardware Guides  
Hardware News  
Input Devices  
Memory  
Mobile Devices  
Motherboards  
Networking Hardware  
Opinions  
PC Cooling  
PC Gaming  
PC Speakers  
Peripherals  
Power Supply Units  
Software  
Sound Cards  
Storage Devices  
Tech Interviews  
User Experiences  
Video Cards  
Dedicated Servers  
Moblin 
JMSL Numerical Library 
IBM® developerWorks 
Sun Developer Network 
Weekly Newsletter
 
Developer Updates  
Free Website Content 
 RSS  Articles
 RSS  Forums
 RSS  All Feeds
Write For Us Get Paid 
Request Media Kit
Contact Us 
Site Map 
Privacy Policy 
Support 
 USERNAME
 
 PASSWORD
 
 
  >>> SIGN UP!  
  Lost Password? 
COMPUTER PROCESSORS

Intel Pentium 4 3.0C 800MHz FSB
By: SPeeD
  • Search For More Articles!
  • Disclaimer
  • Author Terms
  • Rating: 4 stars4 stars4 stars4 stars4 stars / 30
    2003-10-09

    Table of Contents:
  • Intel Pentium 4 3.0C 800MHz FSB
  • Specifications
  • Benchmarking
  • Benchmarking Part 2
  • Conclusion

  • Rate this Article: Poor Best 
      ADD THIS ARTICLE TO:
      Del.ici.ous Digg
      Blink Simpy
      Google Spurl
      Y! MyWeb Furl
    Email Me Similar Content When Posted
    Add Developer Shed Article Feed To Your Site
    Email Article To Friend
    Print Version Of Article
    PDF Version Of Article
     
     
    ADVERTISEMENT


    Intel Pentium 4 3.0C 800MHz FSB - Benchmarking


    (Page 3 of 5 )

     

    Benchmarking
    We will be using the following applications for the benchmarking process.
    • PCMark2002

    • 3DMark01 SE Build330

    • AquaMark v2.3

    • Comanche 4 Benchmark Demo

    • SiSoft Sandra 2003

    • Code Creatures

    • Comanche 4

    • Unreal Tournament 2003 with [H]ardBench

    System Setup

    SiSoft CPU


    As predicted here we see the P4 3GHz "C" chip doing very well. Even with the 3GHz "C" chip no HT Enabled against the 2.4B clocked @3GHz, the 3GHz "C" chip pulls ahead in Dhrystone ALU probably due to the added FSB bandwidth. Although we don't see significant increases in all areas until HT is kicked in and even further when we bump up the CPU speed to 3.5GHz. For the first time since the introduction of the AMD AthlonXP line of CPU's we are seeing an Intel CPU that will not only compete, but blow by the competition. Also, when SSE comes into play things only get better.


    SiSoft Multi-Media

     

     

    We continue to see great performance from the 3.0C and enabling HT pushes the envelope even further. What's really great here, as that not only do you get good performance from the CPU, but with HT enabled we see a significant increase in overall performance. Can you say "free processing horsepower"? As I suspected, the P4 2.4B/533 keeps up rather well to the 3.0C/800 at an equal clock and no HT enabled on the "C" chip. Once we kick in HT it's an entirely different story however. In float performance, we are seeing a 45% increase in performance with HT enabled. That's incredible! Integer performance is seeing a 16% increase. Not too shabby either.


    SiSoft Sandra Memory

     

     

    The trend continues and we are seeing some killer memory performance out of the 3.0C/800 CPU. Notice no change between the 3.0C with and w/out HT enabled which is expected of course since there is no actual clock or bandwidth increase. Once we move up to 3.5GHz however, memory bandwidth is extremely impressive. Who am I kidding? It's impressive at 3GHz!!

    More Computer Processors Articles
    More By SPeeD


     

    Recommended by Dev Hardware

    COMPUTER PROCESSORS ARTICLES

    - Intel Celeron 420
    - Intel Pentium E2140
    - Inside the Machine by Jon Stokes
    - Chip History from 1970 to Today
    - A Brief History of Chips
    - Intel Shows Off at Developer Forum
    - Core 2 Quadro Review
    - Core Concepts
    - AMD Takes on Intel with AM2 and HT
    - Intel Presler 955: Benchmarking the First 65...
    - Computer Chip Scam, Pentium Pirates
    - Intel Beating AMD in the Race to 65nm Process
    - Magnetic Microchips Provide New Spin on Proc...
    - Intel’s Latest Chips: It’s All About (Low) P...
    - 3D Processors, Stacking Cores






    © 2003-2008 by Developer Shed. All rights reserved. DS Cluster 2 hosted by Hostway