Computer Processors

  Home arrow Computer Processors arrow Page 5 - Intel P4 800MHz FSB CPU Round-up
Watch our Tech Videos 
Dev Hardware Forums 
Computer Cases  
Computer Processors  
Computer Systems  
Digital Cameras  
Flat Panels  
Hardware Guides  
Hardware News  
Input Devices  
Mobile Devices  
Networking Hardware  
PC Cooling  
PC Speakers  
Power Supply Units  
Sound Cards  
Storage Devices  
Tech Interviews  
User Experiences  
Video Cards  
Weekly Newsletter
Developer Updates  
Free Website Content 
 RSS  Articles
 RSS  Forums
 RSS  All Feeds
Write For Us 
Contact Us 
Site Map 
Privacy Policy 
  >>> SIGN UP!  
  Lost Password? 

Intel P4 800MHz FSB CPU Round-up
By: Justifier
  • Search For More Articles!
  • Disclaimer
  • Author Terms
  • Rating: 5 stars5 stars5 stars5 stars5 stars / 26

    Table of Contents:
  • Intel P4 800MHz FSB CPU Round-up
  • More images
  • Benchmarks
  • Benchmarks Part 2
  • Overclocking
  • Overclocking Continued
  • Conclusion

  • Rate this Article: Poor Best 
      Del.ici.ous Digg
      Blink Simpy
      Google Spurl
      Y! MyWeb Furl
    Email Me Similar Content When Posted
    Add Developer Shed Article Feed To Your Site
    Email Article To Friend
    Print Version Of Article
    PDF Version Of Article


    Intel P4 800MHz FSB CPU Round-up - Overclocking

    (Page 5 of 7 )


    These new P4's have been said to be "the next c300a" or "the next P4 1.6a". You'll notice that both of the previously mentioned chips are the first chips released of a particular stepping or build. Basically Intel (and AMD for that matter) release a new core and then ramp it up. Fortunately for us overclockers Intel either speed bins or quota bins. If they're speed binning (by binning I mean runs a CPU off the line and places it in the appropriately rated speed bins) they perform a quick test and place it where it's performance matches. When they quota bin they simply place every CPU that rolls off the line in the bin for the CPU they need most. Bascially what I'm saying is that all cores of a particular stepping are alike. It's quite possible for a 3.0GHz chip to roll off the line beside a 2.4c. SOOO, to wrap up what feels like a very confusing paragraph, the slower the rated speed the more headroom for overclocking it should theoretically have!

    Taking the above into consideration it would stand to reason that certainly the 2.4c and 2.6c should overclock respectably, and the 3.0GHz should stand a decent chance as well. Will that be the case? We'll find out.

    The big thing that comes into play with these 200MHz FSB Pentium4's when overclocking is the memory you're using. With the PCI and AGP divider you can simply lock them at 33MHz and 66MHz respectively with no substantial performance hit and overclock the FSB until your hearts content. With the memory that isn't necessarily so. With the memory the higher DDR bus you have your performance scales right along with it. With a bus that is default at 200MHz you need some memory that can carry the mail to say the least. You can of course run your memory at a divider (typically 1/1, 2/3, and 4/5 are you divider options), but the name of the game is keeping your memory at the highest DDR bus possible while pushing your CPU to the maximum stable speed. We chose to use Corsair TWINX PC3200 matched memory (2x256MB modules) for our testing being run at 2.5/6/3/3.

    So what did were we able to overclock to?

    P4 2.4c Overclocking Results


    CPUZ CPU Screen

    CPUZ Memory Screen

    With the 2.4c we were able to push the CPU to a very respectable 3.522Ghz. The drawback to that was that we were forced to run our memory at the 2/3 divider. So while our CPU FSB was at a cool 293MHz, our memory was cruising along at a much tamer 196MHz. We still gain the sizeable bandwidth jump thru our system bus, our memory bus slowed us a bit. To have been able to run the 4/5 divider with this Corsair TWINX memory it would have been required to run at 234MHz and that is a bit too tall of an order even for this stellar memory.

    P4 2.6c Overclocking Results


    CPUZ CPU Screen

    CPUZ Memory Screen

    The 2.6c did not let us down either, coming in at a comparable 3.536GHz. The big advantage here is that our bus was low enough to be able to run our memory at a more stressful 4/5 divider, leaving our memory at a damn respectable 217MHz.

    P4 3.0GHz Overclocking Results


    CPUZ CPU Screen

    CPUZ Memory Screen

    The 3.0GHz checks in with the highest overall overclocked speed at 3.561MHz but pays the stiffest price of all in that the FSB to run at this speed is 237MHz which puts us just out of reach of running a 1/1 memory divider. That forced us into the 4/5 divider and left us at a less than impressive 190MHz DDR bus speed.

    There is some memory on the market that can certainly handle a higher bus speed, and with the better memory we could have possibly reached a better divider/CPU speed match, but for the sake of this review we felt that the popular Corsair TWINX memory was a good choice. The TWINX we used was able to handle a 221MHz bus speed at these settings which in and of itself is an accomplishment for PC3200 memory.

    It also warrants mentioning that the overclocked speeds in this round-up were attained at STOCK COOLING and the speeds listed are absolutely stable in this configuration. I don't mean stable as in "it will run 3dMark01 once", I mean stable as in it will run three loops of 3dMark03 while folding, and then will remain folding overnight with no lockups". I have run two of the three processors in a water cooling rig and in each have gained an additional 80-120MHz STABLE from each. So by no means take these as the end all be all, more as a representation of what's available.

    Just because our CPUs (all store bought) hit these speeds doesn't mean that yours will, it also doesn't mean that yours won't hit higher, again, just a representation.

    Ok, that's enough of this, none of this information means jack if the performance isn't there to back it up, let's get on with the benchmarks!


    Alright, second verse same as the first! We're going to run you thru the exact same benchmarks we showed you for the default CPUs, but this time comparing them all at their overclocked speeds.

    SiSoft Sandra 2003

    SiSoft Sandra CPU Arithmetic

    CPU Arithmetic Results


    2.4c @ 3.522GHz

    2.6c @ 3.536GHz

    3.0GHz @ 3.561GHz

    This makes sense, with the SiSoft CPU arithmetic test it is relying solely on the raw CPU speed, so we see the ever so slight scaling of these similarly clocked CPU's.

    SiSoft Sandra Multimedia Benchmark

    CPU Multimedia Benchmark


    2.4c @ 3.522GHz

    2.6c @ 3.536GHz

    3.0GHz @ 3.561GHz

    Again we see the same as with the arithmetic runs. SiSoft says they're benching the CPU standalone performance and they mean it. :)

    I expect to see whatever gains we anticipate with the higher bus of the lower rated CPU's in the memory tests and the 3d benchmarks, let's go see if that holds water.

    More Computer Processors Articles
    More By Justifier

    blog comments powered by Disqus


    - Intel Unveils Itanium 9500 Processors
    - Intel`s Ultra-Quick i5 and i7 Processors Ava...
    - Intel Nehalem
    - VIA Nano
    - Intel Atom
    - Intel Celeron 420
    - Intel Pentium E2140
    - Inside the Machine by Jon Stokes
    - Chip History from 1970 to Today
    - A Brief History of Chips
    - Intel Shows Off at Developer Forum
    - Core 2 Quadro Review
    - Core Concepts
    - AMD Takes on Intel with AM2 and HT
    - Intel Presler 955: Benchmarking the First 65...

    Developer Shed Affiliates


    © 2003-2019 by Developer Shed. All rights reserved. DS Cluster - Follow our Sitemap
    KEITHLEE2zdeconfigurator/configs/INFUSIONSOFT_OVERLAY.phpzdeconfigurator/configs/ OFFLOADING INFUSIONSOFTLOADING INFUSIONSOFT 1debug:overlay status: OFF
    overlay not displayed overlay cookie defined: TI_CAMPAIGN_1012_D OVERLAY COOKIE set:
    status off