Computer Processors
  Home arrow Computer Processors arrow Page 5 - Celeron D: the Little Processor that C...
Dev Hardware Forums 
Computer Cases  
Computer Processors  
Computer Systems  
Digital Cameras  
Flat Panels  
Hardware Guides  
Hardware News  
Input Devices  
Memory  
Mobile Devices  
Motherboards  
Networking Hardware  
Opinions  
PC Cooling  
PC Gaming  
PC Speakers  
Peripherals  
Power Supply Units  
Software  
Sound Cards  
Storage Devices  
Tech Interviews  
User Experiences  
Video Cards  
Mobile Linux 
APP Generation ROI 
IBM® developerWorks 
Sun Developer Network 
Weekly Newsletter
 
Developer Updates  
Free Website Content 
 RSS  Articles
 RSS  Forums
 RSS  All Feeds
Write For Us Get Paid 
Request Media Kit
Contact Us 
Site Map 
Privacy Policy 
Support 
 USERNAME
 
 PASSWORD
 
 
  >>> SIGN UP!  
  Lost Password? 
COMPUTER PROCESSORS

Celeron D: the Little Processor that Could
By: jkabaseball
  • Search For More Articles!
  • Disclaimer
  • Author Terms
  • Rating: 4 stars4 stars4 stars4 stars4 stars / 76
    2005-04-18

    Table of Contents:
  • Celeron D: the Little Processor that Could
  • Benching
  • PCMark04, LAME
  • WinRar, Doom 3
  • DVD Shrink, SuperPi

  • Rate this Article: Poor Best 
      ADD THIS ARTICLE TO:
      Del.ici.ous Digg
      Blink Simpy
      Google Spurl
      Y! MyWeb Furl
    Email Me Similar Content When Posted
    Add Developer Shed Article Feed To Your Site
    Email Article To Friend
    Print Version Of Article
    PDF Version Of Article
     
     
    ADVERTISEMENT


    Celeron D: the Little Processor that Could - DVD Shrink, SuperPi


    (Page 5 of 5 )

     

    Next I backed up the "Matrix" DVD onto the hard drive. The time is in minutes, not seconds as for the other tests.

    Three minutes isn’t a lot of time when you consider how long it takes to burn the files for a back up.

    SuperPi

    The final test is sheer CPU power. It takes into account cache and CPU speed. If you have high clock speeds, it will complete faster, but throw cache in there, and the results may tip the other way. SuperPi calculates pi, and records the time it takes. The results are from the one million digit test.

    The Celeron D’s smaller cache proves to be its main fault here. The cache stores the calculations to be processed; the more that can be stored, the faster the computation can run. The Celeron D really performs poorly here. Once overclocked, it does beat the Pentium 4, but not enough to brag about.

    I also ran this test at the highest clock speeds of both processors. I use this as a benchmark for testing a processor. The Pentium 4 could clock up to 3.6 GHz, which matched the overclocked speed of the Celeron D; however the Pentium 4 finished in 38 seconds. The Celeron D could overclock to 4 GHz, but only managed 43 seconds. While the newer Celeron Ds overclock very well, the Pentium 4’s cache puts the Celeron D in its rightful place.

    Conclusion

    The Celeron D is a vast improvement of the last generation of Celerons. People think of Celerons as low end, and often call them “crap” and not worth your money. Are people going to start building gaming rigs with Celerons? No; they are not as great as the Pentium 4s, but they still hold their own. What the Celeron has going for it is its price; many of the available speeds cost under $100. The Celeron's ability to clock high is also a major bonus. An overclock to 3.6 GHz is good; many Celerons can hit this speed with proper cooling, and some can go even higher.

    If you want a powerful CPU, get the Pentium 4. If you need a cheap CPU, and don’t mind a mild overclock, the Celeron D is right up your alley. I would like to call the Celeron D “the little processors that could.” Just remember, Prescott cores get hot whether they're used with a Pentium 4 or a Celeron D, so make sure you get a good cooling for the CPU.

    If you have any questions about the Celeron D or any other processor questions, feel free to stop by Devhardware Forums. The friendly people there will answer any questions you may still have.


    DISCLAIMER: The content provided in this article is not warranted or guaranteed by Developer Shed, Inc. The content provided is intended for entertainment and/or educational purposes in order to introduce to the reader key ideas, concepts, and/or product reviews. As such it is incumbent upon the reader to employ real-world tactics for security and implementation of best practices. We are not liable for any negative consequences that may result from implementing any information covered in our articles or tutorials. If this is a hardware review, it is not recommended to open and/or modify your hardware.

       · What a n00b you can overclock celeron D's easily past the 4.2 Ghz area, if you don't...
       · What a n00b, don't you know that just because you reached 4.2GHz doesn't mean that...
       · well each chip is different. Mine was a D0 stepping, while the newer E0 are alot...
       · I have mine running at 3.457GHz, running smoothly and stable. Plus (for some reason)...
       · Ok this cpu has its potential (if u OC it of course)
     

    COMPUTER PROCESSORS ARTICLES

    - VIA Nano
    - Intel Atom
    - Intel Celeron 420
    - Intel Pentium E2140
    - Inside the Machine by Jon Stokes
    - Chip History from 1970 to Today
    - A Brief History of Chips
    - Intel Shows Off at Developer Forum
    - Core 2 Quadro Review
    - Core Concepts
    - AMD Takes on Intel with AM2 and HT
    - Intel Presler 955: Benchmarking the First 65...
    - Computer Chip Scam, Pentium Pirates
    - Intel Beating AMD in the Race to 65nm Process
    - Magnetic Microchips Provide New Spin on Proc...






    © 2003-2008 by Developer Shed. All rights reserved. DS Cluster 3 hosted by Hostway
    Stay green...Green IT