3dMark2000 cII 566mhz 

3dMark2000 c366 @ 567mhz

Whoa nellie!! Yes, them marks are correct.

Conclusions: As you can see previously, the c366 overclocked to 567mhz actually will give you better 3dmarks than the cII 566. Now don't take this as a downer on the cII as we haven't overclocked the cII at all for this review. I have overclocked my new cII and it does very well, upwards of 850+mhz @1.70volts. But for many of you peeps out there who are like me on a budget and don't want to throw down $100 for a new cII with slotket. You can get the same effect out of a $40-$50 Celeron 366 and get the same if not better marks for 1/2 da price.

Now like I said, the new cII 566 will give you better results when it is pushed to higher bus speeds and will put the hurt down on the ol' c366 @567mhz. I have had my new cII running for the last 2 weeks @892mhz @1.75v with no lockups and no crashes. I have run 3dmark and all Q3 demos ran in this article and I can say that the cII will give better performance when it is overclocked.

My conclusion for all this is that if you're not going to overclock a new cII and your currently running a c366 at any overclocked speed, then save your money. But I know there aren't many of you out there that are not going to put this new cII through the ringer and get all the speed out of it as you can. All benchmarks and mhz will vary from system to system. So please don't bombard us w/emails saying that your new cII wont hit 892mhz @1.75v. Now if your cII hits over 900mhz+, feel free to let me know cause we here at the {OCA} will like to keep up with our peeps and their systems and that extra mile they get out of them, past what the manufacturer has allotted us.

3dMark2000 cII 566mhz 

3dMark2000 c366 @ 567mhz

Whoa nellie!! Yes, them marks are correct.

Conclusions: As you can see previously, the c366 overclocked to 567mhz actually will give you better 3dmarks than the cII 566. Now don't take this as a downer on the cII as we haven't overclocked the cII at all for this review. I have overclocked my new cII and it does very well, upwards of 850+mhz @1.70volts. But for many of you peeps out there who are like me on a budget and don't want to throw down $100 for a new cII with slotket. You can get the same effect out of a $40-$50 Celeron 366 and get the same if not better marks for 1/2 da price.

Now like I said, the new cII 566 will give you better results when it is pushed to higher bus speeds and will put the hurt down on the ol' c366 @567mhz. I have had my new cII running for the last 2 weeks @892mhz @1.75v with no lockups and no crashes. I have run 3dmark and all Q3 demos ran in this article and I can say that the cII will give better performance when it is overclocked.

My conclusion for all this is that if you're not going to overclock a new cII and your currently running a c366 at any overclocked speed, then save your money. But I know there aren't many of you out there that are not going to put this new cII through the ringer and get all the speed out of it as you can. All benchmarks and mhz will vary from system to system. So please don't bombard us w/emails saying that your new cII wont hit 892mhz @1.75v. Now if your cII hits over 900mhz+, feel free to let me know cause we here at the {OCA} will like to keep up with our peeps and their systems and that extra mile they get out of them, past what the manufacturer has allotted us.

3dMark2000 cII 566mhz 

3dMark2000 c366 @ 567mhz

Whoa nellie!! Yes, them marks are correct.

Conclusions: As you can see previously, the c366 overclocked to 567mhz actually will give you better 3dmarks than the cII 566. Now don't take this as a downer on the cII as we haven't overclocked the cII at all for this review. I have overclocked my new cII and it does very well, upwards of 850+mhz @1.70volts. But for many of you peeps out there who are like me on a budget and don't want to throw down $100 for a new cII with slotket. You can get the same effect out of a $40-$50 Celeron 366 and get the same if not better marks for 1/2 da price.

Now like I said, the new cII 566 will give you better results when it is pushed to higher bus speeds and will put the hurt down on the ol' c366 @567mhz. I have had my new cII running for the last 2 weeks @892mhz @1.75v with no lockups and no crashes. I have run 3dmark and all Q3 demos ran in this article and I can say that the cII will give better performance when it is overclocked.

My conclusion for all this is that if you're not going to overclock a new cII and your currently running a c366 at any overclocked speed, then save your money. But I know there aren't many of you out there that are not going to put this new cII through the ringer and get all the speed out of it as you can. All benchmarks and mhz will vary from system to system. So please don't bombard us w/emails saying that your new cII wont hit 892mhz @1.75v. Now if your cII hits over 900mhz+, feel free to let me know cause we here at the {OCA} will like to keep up with our peeps and their systems and that extra mile they get out of them, past what the manufacturer has allotted us.

3dMark2000 cII 566mhz 

3dMark2000 c366 @ 567mhz

Whoa nellie!! Yes, them marks are correct.

Conclusions: As you can see previously, the c366 overclocked to 567mhz actually will give you better 3dmarks than the cII 566. Now don't take this as a downer on the cII as we haven't overclocked the cII at all for this review. I have overclocked my new cII and it does very well, upwards of 850+mhz @1.70volts. But for many of you peeps out there who are like me on a budget and don't want to throw down $100 for a new cII with slotket. You can get the same effect out of a $40-$50 Celeron 366 and get the same if not better marks for 1/2 da price.

Now like I said, the new cII 566 will give you better results when it is pushed to higher bus speeds and will put the hurt down on the ol' c366 @567mhz. I have had my new cII running for the last 2 weeks @892mhz @1.75v with no lockups and no crashes. I have run 3dmark and all Q3 demos ran in this article and I can say that the cII will give better performance when it is overclocked.

My conclusion for all this is that if you're not going to overclock a new cII and your currently running a c366 at any overclocked speed, then save your money. But I know there aren't many of you out there that are not going to put this new cII through the ringer and get all the speed out of it as you can. All benchmarks and mhz will vary from system to system. So please don't bombard us w/emails saying that your new cII wont hit 892mhz @1.75v. Now if your cII hits over 900mhz+, feel free to let me know cause we here at the {OCA} will like to keep up with our peeps and their systems and that extra mile they get out of them, past what the manufacturer has allotted us.

3dMark2000 cII 566mhz 

3dMark2000 c366 @ 567mhz

Whoa nellie!! Yes, them marks are correct.

Conclusions: As you can see previously, the c366 overclocked to 567mhz actually will give you better 3dmarks than the cII 566. Now don't take this as a downer on the cII as we haven't overclocked the cII at all for this review. I have overclocked my new cII and it does very well, upwards of 850+mhz @1.70volts. But for many of you peeps out there who are like me on a budget and don't want to throw down $100 for a new cII with slotket. You can get the same effect out of a $40-$50 Celeron 366 and get the same if not better marks for 1/2 da price.

Now like I said, the new cII 566 will give you better results when it is pushed to higher bus speeds and will put the hurt down on the ol' c366 @567mhz. I have had my new cII running for the last 2 weeks @892mhz @1.75v with no lockups and no crashes. I have run 3dmark and all Q3 demos ran in this article and I can say that the cII will give better performance when it is overclocked.

My conclusion for all this is that if you're not going to overclock a new cII and your currently running a c366 at any overclocked speed, then save your money. But I know there aren't many of you out there that are not going to put this new cII through the ringer and get all the speed out of it as you can. All benchmarks and mhz will vary from system to system. So please don't bombard us w/emails saying that your new cII wont hit 892mhz @1.75v. Now if your cII hits over 900mhz+, feel free to let me know cause we here at the {OCA} will like to keep up with our peeps and their systems and that extra mile they get out of them, past what the manufacturer has allotted us.

3dMark2000 cII 566mhz 

3dMark2000 c366 @ 567mhz

Whoa nellie!! Yes, them marks are correct.

Conclusions: As you can see previously, the c366 overclocked to 567mhz actually will give you better 3dmarks than the cII 566. Now don't take this as a downer on the cII as we haven't overclocked the cII at all for this review. I have overclocked my new cII and it does very well, upwards of 850+mhz @1.70volts. But for many of you peeps out there who are like me on a budget and don't want to throw down $100 for a new cII with slotket. You can get the same effect out of a $40-$50 Celeron 366 and get the same if not better marks for 1/2 da price.

Now like I said, the new cII 566 will give you better results when it is pushed to higher bus speeds and will put the hurt down on the ol' c366 @567mhz. I have had my new cII running for the last 2 weeks @892mhz @1.75v with no lockups and no crashes. I have run 3dmark and all Q3 demos ran in this article and I can say that the cII will give better performance when it is overclocked.

My conclusion for all this is that if you're not going to overclock a new cII and your currently running a c366 at any overclocked speed, then save your money. But I know there aren't many of you out there that are not going to put this new cII through the ringer and get all the speed out of it as you can. All benchmarks and mhz will vary from system to system. So please don't bombard us w/emails saying that your new cII wont hit 892mhz @1.75v. Now if your cII hits over 900mhz+, feel free to let me know cause we here at the {OCA} will like to keep up with our peeps and their systems and that extra mile they get out of them, past what the manufacturer has allotted us.

3dMark2000 cII 566mhz 

3dMark2000 c366 @ 567mhz

Whoa nellie!! Yes, them marks are correct.

Conclusions: As you can see previously, the c366 overclocked to 567mhz actually will give you better 3dmarks than the cII 566. Now don't take this as a downer on the cII as we haven't overclocked the cII at all for this review. I have overclocked my new cII and it does very well, upwards of 850+mhz @1.70volts. But for many of you peeps out there who are like me on a budget and don't want to throw down $100 for a new cII with slotket. You can get the same effect out of a $40-$50 Celeron 366 and get the same if not better marks for 1/2 da price.

Now like I said, the new cII 566 will give you better results when it is pushed to higher bus speeds and will put the hurt down on the ol' c366 @567mhz. I have had my new cII running for the last 2 weeks @892mhz @1.75v with no lockups and no crashes. I have run 3dmark and all Q3 demos ran in this article and I can say that the cII will give better performance when it is overclocked.

My conclusion for all this is that if you're not going to overclock a new cII and your currently running a c366 at any overclocked speed, then save your money. But I know there aren't many of you out there that are not going to put this new cII through the ringer and get all the speed out of it as you can. All benchmarks and mhz will vary from system to system. So please don't bombard us w/emails saying that your new cII wont hit 892mhz @1.75v. Now if your cII hits over 900mhz+, feel free to let me know cause we here at the {OCA} will like to keep up with our peeps and their systems and that extra mile they get out of them, past what the manufacturer has allotted us.

3dMark2000 cII 566mhz 

3dMark2000 c366 @ 567mhz

Whoa nellie!! Yes, them marks are correct.

Conclusions: As you can see previously, the c366 overclocked to 567mhz actually will give you better 3dmarks than the cII 566. Now don't take this as a downer on the cII as we haven't overclocked the cII at all for this review. I have overclocked my new cII and it does very well, upwards of 850+mhz @1.70volts. But for many of you peeps out there who are like me on a budget and don't want to throw down $100 for a new cII with slotket. You can get the same effect out of a $40-$50 Celeron 366 and get the same if not better marks for 1/2 da price.

Now like I said, the new cII 566 will give you better results when it is pushed to higher bus speeds and will put the hurt down on the ol' c366 @567mhz. I have had my new cII running for the last 2 weeks @892mhz @1.75v with no lockups and no crashes. I have run 3dmark and all Q3 demos ran in this article and I can say that the cII will give better performance when it is overclocked.

My conclusion for all this is that if you're not going to overclock a new cII and your currently running a c366 at any overclocked speed, then save your money. But I know there aren't many of you out there that are not going to put this new cII through the ringer and get all the speed out of it as you can. All benchmarks and mhz will vary from system to system. So please don't bombard us w/emails saying that your new cII wont hit 892mhz @1.75v. Now if your cII hits over 900mhz+, feel free to let me know cause we here at the {OCA} will like to keep up with our peeps and their systems and that extra mile they get out of them, past what the manufacturer has allotted us.

3dMark2000 cII 566mhz 

3dMark2000 c366 @ 567mhz

Whoa nellie!! Yes, them marks are correct.

Conclusions: As you can see previously, the c366 overclocked to 567mhz actually will give you better 3dmarks than the cII 566. Now don't take this as a downer on the cII as we haven't overclocked the cII at all for this review. I have overclocked my new cII and it does very well, upwards of 850+mhz @1.70volts. But for many of you peeps out there who are like me on a budget and don't want to throw down $100 for a new cII with slotket. You can get the same effect out of a $40-$50 Celeron 366 and get the same if not better marks for 1/2 da price.

Now like I said, the new cII 566 will give you better results when it is pushed to higher bus speeds and will put the hurt down on the ol' c366 @567mhz. I have had my new cII running for the last 2 weeks @892mhz @1.75v with no lockups and no crashes. I have run 3dmark and all Q3 demos ran in this article and I can say that the cII will give better performance when it is overclocked.

My conclusion for all this is that if you're not going to overclock a new cII and your currently running a c366 at any overclocked speed, then save your money. But I know there aren't many of you out there that are not going to put this new cII through the ringer and get all the speed out of it as you can. All benchmarks and mhz will vary from system to system. So please don't bombard us w/emails saying that your new cII wont hit 892mhz @1.75v. Now if your cII hits over 900mhz+, feel free to let me know cause we here at the {OCA} will like to keep up with our peeps and their systems and that extra mile they get out of them, past what the manufacturer has allotted us.

3dMark2000 cII 566mhz 

3dMark2000 c366 @ 567mhz

Whoa nellie!! Yes, them marks are correct.

Conclusions: As you can see previously, the c366 overclocked to 567mhz actually will give you better 3dmarks than the cII 566. Now don't take this as a downer on the cII as we haven't overclocked the cII at all for this review. I have overclocked my new cII and it does very well, upwards of 850+mhz @1.70volts. But for many of you peeps out there who are like me on a budget and don't want to throw down $100 for a new cII with slotket. You can get the same effect out of a $40-$50 Celeron 366 and get the same if not better marks for 1/2 da price.

Now like I said, the new cII 566 will give you better results when it is pushed to higher bus speeds and will put the hurt down on the ol' c366 @567mhz. I have had my new cII running for the last 2 weeks @892mhz @1.75v with no lockups and no crashes. I have run 3dmark and all Q3 demos ran in this article and I can say that the cII will give better performance when it is overclocked.

My conclusion for all this is that if you're not going to overclock a new cII and your currently running a c366 at any overclocked speed, then save your money. But I know there aren't many of you out there that are not going to put this new cII through the ringer and get all the speed out of it as you can. All benchmarks and mhz will vary from system to system. So please don't bombard us w/emails saying that your new cII wont hit 892mhz @1.75v. Now if your cII hits over 900mhz+, feel free to let me know cause we here at the {OCA} will like to keep up with our peeps and their systems and that extra mile they get out of them, past what the manufacturer has allotted us.

3dMark2000 cII 566mhz 

3dMark2000 c366 @ 567mhz

Whoa nellie!! Yes, them marks are correct.

Conclusions: As you can see previously, the c366 overclocked to 567mhz actually will give you better 3dmarks than the cII 566. Now don't take this as a downer on the cII as we haven't overclocked the cII at all for this review. I have overclocked my new cII and it does very well, upwards of 850+mhz @1.70volts. But for many of you peeps out there who are like me on a budget and don't want to throw down $100 for a new cII with slotket. You can get the same effect out of a $40-$50 Celeron 366 and get the same if not better marks for 1/2 da price.

Now like I said, the new cII 566 will give you better results when it is pushed to higher bus speeds and will put the hurt down on the ol' c366 @567mhz. I have had my new cII running for the last 2 weeks @892mhz @1.75v with no lockups and no crashes. I have run 3dmark and all Q3 demos ran in this article and I can say that the cII will give better performance when it is overclocked.

My conclusion for all this is that if you're not going to overclock a new cII and your currently running a c366 at any overclocked speed, then save your money. But I know there aren't many of you out there that are not going to put this new cII through the ringer and get all the speed out of it as you can. All benchmarks and mhz will vary from system to system. So please don't bombard us w/emails saying that your new cII wont hit 892mhz @1.75v. Now if your cII hits over 900mhz+, feel free to let me know cause we here at the {OCA} will like to keep up with our peeps and their systems and that extra mile they get out of them, past what the manufacturer has allotted us.

3dMark2000 cII 566mhz 

3dMark2000 c366 @ 567mhz

Whoa nellie!! Yes, them marks are correct.

Conclusions: As you can see previously, the c366 overclocked to 567mhz actually will give you better 3dmarks than the cII 566. Now don't take this as a downer on the cII as we haven't overclocked the cII at all for this review. I have overclocked my new cII and it does very well, upwards of 850+mhz @1.70volts. But for many of you peeps out there who are like me on a budget and don't want to throw down $100 for a new cII with slotket. You can get the same effect out of a $40-$50 Celeron 366 and get the same if not better marks for 1/2 da price.

Now like I said, the new cII 566 will give you better results when it is pushed to higher bus speeds and will put the hurt down on the ol' c366 @567mhz. I have had my new cII running for the last 2 weeks @892mhz @1.75v with no lockups and no crashes. I have run 3dmark and all Q3 demos ran in this article and I can say that the cII will give better performance when it is overclocked.

My conclusion for all this is that if you're not going to overclock a new cII and your currently running a c366 at any overclocked speed, then save your money. But I know there aren't many of you out there that are not going to put this new cII through the ringer and get all the speed out of it as you can. All benchmarks and mhz will vary from system to system. So please don't bombard us w/emails saying that your new cII wont hit 892mhz @1.75v. Now if your cII hits over 900mhz+, feel free to let me know cause we here at the {OCA} will like to keep up with our peeps and their systems and that extra mile they get out of them, past what the manufacturer has allotted us.

3dMark2000 cII 566mhz 

3dMark2000 c366 @ 567mhz

Whoa nellie!! Yes, them marks are correct.

Conclusions: As you can see previously, the c366 overclocked to 567mhz actually will give you better 3dmarks than the cII 566. Now don't take this as a downer on the cII as we haven't overclocked the cII at all for this review. I have overclocked my new cII and it does very well, upwards of 850+mhz @1.70volts. But for many of you peeps out there who are like me on a budget and don't want to throw down $100 for a new cII with slotket. You can get the same effect out of a $40-$50 Celeron 366 and get the same if not better marks for 1/2 da price.

Now like I said, the new cII 566 will give you better results when it is pushed to higher bus speeds and will put the hurt down on the ol' c366 @567mhz. I have had my new cII running for the last 2 weeks @892mhz @1.75v with no lockups and no crashes. I have run 3dmark and all Q3 demos ran in this article and I can say that the cII will give better performance when it is overclocked.

My conclusion for all this is that if you're not going to overclock a new cII and your currently running a c366 at any overclocked speed, then save your money. But I know there aren't many of you out there that are not going to put this new cII through the ringer and get all the speed out of it as you can. All benchmarks and mhz will vary from system to system. So please don't bombard us w/emails saying that your new cII wont hit 892mhz @1.75v. Now if your cII hits over 900mhz+, feel free to let me know cause we here at the {OCA} will like to keep up with our peeps and their systems and that extra mile they get out of them, past what the manufacturer has allotted us.

3dMark2000 cII 566mhz 

3dMark2000 c366 @ 567mhz

Whoa nellie!! Yes, them marks are correct.

Conclusions: As you can see previously, the c366 overclocked to 567mhz actually will give you better 3dmarks than the cII 566. Now don't take this as a downer on the cII as we haven't overclocked the cII at all for this review. I have overclocked my new cII and it does very well, upwards of 850+mhz @1.70volts. But for many of you peeps out there who are like me on a budget and don't want to throw down $100 for a new cII with slotket. You can get the same effect out of a $40-$50 Celeron 366 and get the same if not better marks for 1/2 da price.

Now like I said, the new cII 566 will give you better results when it is pushed to higher bus speeds and will put the hurt down on the ol' c366 @567mhz. I have had my new cII running for the last 2 weeks @892mhz @1.75v with no lockups and no crashes. I have run 3dmark and all Q3 demos ran in this article and I can say that the cII will give better performance when it is overclocked.

My conclusion for all this is that if you're not going to overclock a new cII and your currently running a c366 at any overclocked speed, then save your money. But I know there aren't many of you out there that are not going to put this new cII through the ringer and get all the speed out of it as you can. All benchmarks and mhz will vary from system to system. So please don't bombard us w/emails saying that your new cII wont hit 892mhz @1.75v. Now if your cII hits over 900mhz+, feel free to let me know cause we here at the {OCA} will like to keep up with our peeps and their systems and that extra mile they get out of them, past what the manufacturer has allotted us.

3dMark2000 cII 566mhz 

3dMark2000 c366 @ 567mhz

Whoa nellie!! Yes, them marks are correct.

Conclusions: As you can see previously, the c366 overclocked to 567mhz actually will give you better 3dmarks than the cII 566. Now don't take this as a downer on the cII as we haven't overclocked the cII at all for this review. I have overclocked my new cII and it does very well, upwards of 850+mhz @1.70volts. But for many of you peeps out there who are like me on a budget and don't want to throw down $100 for a new cII with slotket. You can get the same effect out of a $40-$50 Celeron 366 and get the same if not better marks for 1/2 da price.

Now like I said, the new cII 566 will give you better results when it is pushed to higher bus speeds and will put the hurt down on the ol' c366 @567mhz. I have had my new cII running for the last 2 weeks @892mhz @1.75v with no lockups and no crashes. I have run 3dmark and all Q3 demos ran in this article and I can say that the cII will give better performance when it is overclocked.

My conclusion for all this is that if you're not going to overclock a new cII and your currently running a c366 at any overclocked speed, then save your money. But I know there aren't many of you out there that are not going to put this new cII through the ringer and get all the speed out of it as you can. All benchmarks and mhz will vary from system to system. So please don't bombard us w/emails saying that your new cII wont hit 892mhz @1.75v. Now if your cII hits over 900mhz+, feel free to let me know cause we here at the {OCA} will like to keep up with our peeps and their systems and that extra mile they get out of them, past what the manufacturer has allotted us.

3dMark2000 cII 566mhz 

3dMark2000 c366 @ 567mhz

Whoa nellie!! Yes, them marks are correct.

Conclusions: As you can see previously, the c366 overclocked to 567mhz actually will give you better 3dmarks than the cII 566. Now don't take this as a downer on the cII as we haven't overclocked the cII at all for this review. I have overclocked my new cII and it does very well, upwards of 850+mhz @1.70volts. But for many of you peeps out there who are like me on a budget and don't want to throw down $100 for a new cII with slotket. You can get the same effect out of a $40-$50 Celeron 366 and get the same if not better marks for 1/2 da price.

Now like I said, the new cII 566 will give you better results when it is pushed to higher bus speeds and will put the hurt down on the ol' c366 @567mhz. I have had my new cII running for the last 2 weeks @892mhz @1.75v with no lockups and no crashes. I have run 3dmark and all Q3 demos ran in this article and I can say that the cII will give better performance when it is overclocked.

My conclusion for all this is that if you're not going to overclock a new cII and your currently running a c366 at any overclocked speed, then save your money. But I know there aren't many of you out there that are not going to put this new cII through the ringer and get all the speed out of it as you can. All benchmarks and mhz will vary from system to system. So please don't bombard us w/emails saying that your new cII wont hit 892mhz @1.75v. Now if your cII hits over 900mhz+, feel free to let me know cause we here at the {OCA} will like to keep up with our peeps and their systems and that extra mile they get out of them, past what the manufacturer has allotted us.

3dMark2000 cII 566mhz 

3dMark2000 c366 @ 567mhz

Whoa nellie!! Yes, them marks are correct.

Conclusions: As you can see previously, the c366 overclocked to 567mhz actually will give you better 3dmarks than the cII 566. Now don't take this as a downer on the cII as we haven't overclocked the cII at all for this review. I have overclocked my new cII and it does very well, upwards of 850+mhz @1.70volts. But for many of you peeps out there who are like me on a budget and don't want to throw down $100 for a new cII with slotket. You can get the same effect out of a $40-$50 Celeron 366 and get the same if not better marks for 1/2 da price.

Now like I said, the new cII 566 will give you better results when it is pushed to higher bus speeds and will put the hurt down on the ol' c366 @567mhz. I have had my new cII running for the last 2 weeks @892mhz @1.75v with no lockups and no crashes. I have run 3dmark and all Q3 demos ran in this article and I can say that the cII will give better performance when it is overclocked.

My conclusion for all this is that if you're not going to overclock a new cII and your currently running a c366 at any overclocked speed, then save your money. But I know there aren't many of you out there that are not going to put this new cII through the ringer and get all the speed out of it as you can. All benchmarks and mhz will vary from system to system. So please don't bombard us w/emails saying that your new cII wont hit 892mhz @1.75v. Now if your cII hits over 900mhz+, feel free to let me know cause we here at the {OCA} will like to keep up with our peeps and their systems and that extra mile they get out of them, past what the manufacturer has allotted us.

3dMark2000 cII 566mhz 

3dMark2000 c366 @ 567mhz

Whoa nellie!! Yes, them marks are correct.

Conclusions: As you can see previously, the c366 overclocked to 567mhz actually will give you better 3dmarks than the cII 566. Now don't take this as a downer on the cII as we haven't overclocked the cII at all for this review. I have overclocked my new cII and it does very well, upwards of 850+mhz @1.70volts. But for many of you peeps out there who are like me on a budget and don't want to throw down $100 for a new cII with slotket. You can get the same effect out of a $40-$50 Celeron 366 and get the same if not better marks for 1/2 da price.

Now like I said, the new cII 566 will give you better results when it is pushed to higher bus speeds and will put the hurt down on the ol' c366 @567mhz. I have had my new cII running for the last 2 weeks @892mhz @1.75v with no lockups and no crashes. I have run 3dmark and all Q3 demos ran in this article and I can say that the cII will give better performance when it is overclocked.

My conclusion for all this is that if you're not going to overclock a new cII and your currently running a c366 at any overclocked speed, then save your money. But I know there aren't many of you out there that are not going to put this new cII through the ringer and get all the speed out of it as you can. All benchmarks and mhz will vary from system to system. So please don't bombard us w/emails saying that your new cII wont hit 892mhz @1.75v. Now if your cII hits over 900mhz+, feel free to let me know cause we here at the {OCA} will like to keep up with our peeps and their systems and that extra mile they get out of them, past what the manufacturer has allotted us.

3dMark2000 cII 566mhz 

3dMark2000 c366 @ 567mhz

Whoa nellie!! Yes, them marks are correct.

Conclusions: As you can see previously, the c366 overclocked to 567mhz actually will give you better 3dmarks than the cII 566. Now don't take this as a downer on the cII as we haven't overclocked the cII at all for this review. I have overclocked my new cII and it does very well, upwards of 850+mhz @1.70volts. But for many of you peeps out there who are like me on a budget and don't want to throw down $100 for a new cII with slotket. You can get the same effect out of a $40-$50 Celeron 366 and get the same if not better marks for 1/2 da price.

Now like I said, the new cII 566 will give you better results when it is pushed to higher bus speeds and will put the hurt down on the ol' c366 @567mhz. I have had my new cII running for the last 2 weeks @892mhz @1.75v with no lockups and no crashes. I have run 3dmark and all Q3 demos ran in this article and I can say that the cII will give better performance when it is overclocked.

My conclusion for all this is that if you're not going to overclock a new cII and your currently running a c366 at any overclocked speed, then save your money. But I know there aren't many of you out there that are not going to put this new cII through the ringer and get all the speed out of it as you can. All benchmarks and mhz will vary from system to system. So please don't bombard us w/emails saying that your new cII wont hit 892mhz @1.75v. Now if your cII hits over 900mhz+, feel free to let me know cause we here at the {OCA} will like to keep up with our peeps and their systems and that extra mile they get out of them, past what the manufacturer has allotted us.

3dMark2000 cII 566mhz 

3dMark2000 c366 @ 567mhz

Whoa nellie!! Yes, them marks are correct.

Conclusions: As you can see previously, the c366 overclocked to 567mhz actually will give you better 3dmarks than the cII 566. Now don't take this as a downer on the cII as we haven't overclocked the cII at all for this review. I have overclocked my new cII and it does very well, upwards of 850+mhz @1.70volts. But for many of you peeps out there who are like me on a budget and don't want to throw down $100 for a new cII with slotket. You can get the same effect out of a $40-$50 Celeron 366 and get the same if not better marks for 1/2 da price.

Now like I said, the new cII 566 will give you better results when it is pushed to higher bus speeds and will put the hurt down on the ol' c366 @567mhz. I have had my new cII running for the last 2 weeks @892mhz @1.75v with no lockups and no crashes. I have run 3dmark and all Q3 demos ran in this article and I can say that the cII will give better performance when it is overclocked.

My conclusion for all this is that if you're not going to overclock a new cII and your currently running a c366 at any overclocked speed, then save your money. But I know there aren't many of you out there that are not going to put this new cII through the ringer and get all the speed out of it as you can. All benchmarks and mhz will vary from system to system. So please don't bombard us w/emails saying that your new cII wont hit 892mhz @1.75v. Now if your cII hits over 900mhz+, feel free to let me know cause we here at the {OCA} will like to keep up with our peeps and their systems and that extra mile they get out of them, past what the manufacturer has allotted us.

3dMark2000 cII 566mhz 

3dMark2000 c366 @ 567mhz

Whoa nellie!! Yes, them marks are correct.

Conclusions: As you can see previously, the c366 overclocked to 567mhz actually will give you better 3dmarks than the cII 566. Now don't take this as a downer on the cII as we haven't overclocked the cII at all for this review. I have overclocked my new cII and it does very well, upwards of 850+mhz @1.70volts. But for many of you peeps out there who are like me on a budget and don't want to throw down $100 for a new cII with slotket. You can get the same effect out of a $40-$50 Celeron 366 and get the same if not better marks for 1/2 da price.

Now like I said, the new cII 566 will give you better results when it is pushed to higher bus speeds and will put the hurt down on the ol' c366 @567mhz. I have had my new cII running for the last 2 weeks @892mhz @1.75v with no lockups and no crashes. I have run 3dmark and all Q3 demos ran in this article and I can say that the cII will give better performance when it is overclocked.

My conclusion for all this is that if you're not going to overclock a new cII and your currently running a c366 at any overclocked speed, then save your money. But I know there aren't many of you out there that are not going to put this new cII through the ringer and get all the speed out of it as you can. All benchmarks and mhz will vary from system to system. So please don't bombard us w/emails saying that your new cII wont hit 892mhz @1.75v. Now if your cII hits over 900mhz+, feel free to let me know cause we here at the {OCA} will like to keep up with our peeps and their systems and that extra mile they get out of them, past what the manufacturer has allotted us.

3dMark2000 cII 566mhz 

3dMark2000 c366 @ 567mhz

Whoa nellie!! Yes, them marks are correct.

Conclusions: As you can see previously, the c366 overclocked to 567mhz actually will give you better 3dmarks than the cII 566. Now don't take this as a downer on the cII as we haven't overclocked the cII at all for this review. I have overclocked my new cII and it does very well, upwards of 850+mhz @1.70volts. But for many of you peeps out there who are like me on a budget and don't want to throw down $100 for a new cII with slotket. You can get the same effect out of a $40-$50 Celeron 366 and get the same if not better marks for 1/2 da price.

Now like I said, the new cII 566 will give you better results when it is pushed to higher bus speeds and will put the hurt down on the ol' c366 @567mhz. I have had my new cII running for the last 2 weeks @892mhz @1.75v with no lockups and no crashes. I have run 3dmark and all Q3 demos ran in this article and I can say that the cII will give better performance when it is overclocked.

My conclusion for all this is that if you're not going to overclock a new cII and your currently running a c366 at any overclocked speed, then save your money. But I know there aren't many of you out there that are not going to put this new cII through the ringer and get all the speed out of it as you can. All benchmarks and mhz will vary from system to system. So please don't bombard us w/emails saying that your new cII wont hit 892mhz @1.75v. Now if your cII hits over 900mhz+, feel free to let me know cause we here at the {OCA} will like to keep up with our peeps and their systems and that extra mile they get out of them, past what the manufacturer has allotted us.

3dMark2000 cII 566mhz 

3dMark2000 c366 @ 567mhz

Whoa nellie!! Yes, them marks are correct.

Conclusions: As you can see previously, the c366 overclocked to 567mhz actually will give you better 3dmarks than the cII 566. Now don't take this as a downer on the cII as we haven't overclocked the cII at all for this review. I have overclocked my new cII and it does very well, upwards of 850+mhz @1.70volts. But for many of you peeps out there who are like me on a budget and don't want to throw down $100 for a new cII with slotket. You can get the same effect out of a $40-$50 Celeron 366 and get the same if not better marks for 1/2 da price.

Now like I said, the new cII 566 will give you better results when it is pushed to higher bus speeds and will put the hurt down on the ol' c366 @567mhz. I have had my new cII running for the last 2 weeks @892mhz @1.75v with no lockups and no crashes. I have run 3dmark and all Q3 demos ran in this article and I can say that the cII will give better performance when it is overclocked.

My conclusion for all this is that if you're not going to overclock a new cII and your currently running a c366 at any overclocked speed, then save your money. But I know there aren't many of you out there that are not going to put this new cII through the ringer and get all the speed out of it as you can. All benchmarks and mhz will vary from system to system. So please don't bombard us w/emails saying that your new cII wont hit 892mhz @1.75v. Now if your cII hits over 900mhz+, feel free to let me know cause we here at the {OCA} will like to keep up with our peeps and their systems and that extra mile they get out of them, past what the manufacturer has allotted us.

3dMark2000 cII 566mhz 

3dMark2000 c366 @ 567mhz

Whoa nellie!! Yes, them marks are correct.

Conclusions: As you can see previously, the c366 overclocked to 567mhz actually will give you better 3dmarks than the cII 566. Now don't take this as a downer on the cII as we haven't overclocked the cII at all for this review. I have overclocked my new cII and it does very well, upwards of 850+mhz @1.70volts. But for many of you peeps out there who are like me on a budget and don't want to throw down $100 for a new cII with slotket. You can get the same effect out of a $40-$50 Celeron 366 and get the same if not better marks for 1/2 da price.

Now like I said, the new cII 566 will give you better results when it is pushed to higher bus speeds and will put the hurt down on the ol' c366 @567mhz. I have had my new cII running for the last 2 weeks @892mhz @1.75v with no lockups and no crashes. I have run 3dmark and all Q3 demos ran in this article and I can say that the cII will give better performance when it is overclocked.

My conclusion for all this is that if you're not going to overclock a new cII and your currently running a c366 at any overclocked speed, then save your money. But I know there aren't many of you out there that are not going to put this new cII through the ringer and get all the speed out of it as you can. All benchmarks and mhz will vary from system to system. So please don't bombard us w/emails saying that your new cII wont hit 892mhz @1.75v. Now if your cII hits over 900mhz+, feel free to let me know cause we here at the {OCA} will like to keep up with our peeps and their systems and that extra mile they get out of them, past what the manufacturer has allotted us.

3dMark2000 cII 566mhz 

3dMark2000 c366 @ 567mhz

Whoa nellie!! Yes, them marks are correct.

Conclusions: As you can see previously, the c366 overclocked to 567mhz actually will give you better 3dmarks than the cII 566. Now don't take this as a downer on the cII as we haven't overclocked the cII at all for this review. I have overclocked my new cII and it does very well, upwards of 850+mhz @1.70volts. But for many of you peeps out there who are like me on a budget and don't want to throw down $100 for a new cII with slotket. You can get the same effect out of a $40-$50 Celeron 366 and get the same if not better marks for 1/2 da price.

Now like I said, the new cII 566 will give you better results when it is pushed to higher bus speeds and will put the hurt down on the ol' c366 @567mhz. I have had my new cII running for the last 2 weeks @892mhz @1.75v with no lockups and no crashes. I have run 3dmark and all Q3 demos ran in this article and I can say that the cII will give better performance when it is overclocked.

My conclusion for all this is that if you're not going to overclock a new cII and your currently running a c366 at any overclocked speed, then save your money. But I know there aren't many of you out there that are not going to put this new cII through the ringer and get all the speed out of it as you can. All benchmarks and mhz will vary from system to system. So please don't bombard us w/emails saying that your new cII wont hit 892mhz @1.75v. Now if your cII hits over 900mhz+, feel free to let me know cause we here at the {OCA} will like to keep up with our peeps and their systems and that extra mile they get out of them, past what the manufacturer has allotted us.

3dMark2000 cII 566mhz 

3dMark2000 c366 @ 567mhz

Whoa nellie!! Yes, them marks are correct.

Conclusions: As you can see previously, the c366 overclocked to 567mhz actually will give you better 3dmarks than the cII 566. Now don't take this as a downer on the cII as we haven't overclocked the cII at all for this review. I have overclocked my new cII and it does very well, upwards of 850+mhz @1.70volts. But for many of you peeps out there who are like me on a budget and don't want to throw down $100 for a new cII with slotket. You can get the same effect out of a $40-$50 Celeron 366 and get the same if not better marks for 1/2 da price.

Now like I said, the new cII 566 will give you better results when it is pushed to higher bus speeds and will put the hurt down on the ol' c366 @567mhz. I have had my new cII running for the last 2 weeks @892mhz @1.75v with no lockups and no crashes. I have run 3dmark and all Q3 demos ran in this article and I can say that the cII will give better performance when it is overclocked.

My conclusion for all this is that if you're not going to overclock a new cII and your currently running a c366 at any overclocked speed, then save your money. But I know there aren't many of you out there that are not going to put this new cII through the ringer and get all the speed out of it as you can. All benchmarks and mhz will vary from system to system. So please don't bombard us w/emails saying that your new cII wont hit 892mhz @1.75v. Now if your cII hits over 900mhz+, feel free to let me know cause we here at the {OCA} will like to keep up with our peeps and their systems and that extra mile they get out of them, past what the manufacturer has allotted us.

3dMark2000 cII 566mhz 

3dMark2000 c366 @ 567mhz

Whoa nellie!! Yes, them marks are correct.

Conclusions: As you can see previously, the c366 overclocked to 567mhz actually will give you better 3dmarks than the cII 566. Now don't take this as a downer on the cII as we haven't overclocked the cII at all for this review. I have overclocked my new cII and it does very well, upwards of 850+mhz @1.70volts. But for many of you peeps out there who are like me on a budget and don't want to throw down $100 for a new cII with slotket. You can get the same effect out of a $40-$50 Celeron 366 and get the same if not better marks for 1/2 da price.

Now like I said, the new cII 566 will give you better results when it is pushed to higher bus speeds and will put the hurt down on the ol' c366 @567mhz. I have had my new cII running for the last 2 weeks @892mhz @1.75v with no lockups and no crashes. I have run 3dmark and all Q3 demos ran in this article and I can say that the cII will give better performance when it is overclocked.

My conclusion for all this is that if you're not going to overclock a new cII and your currently running a c366 at any overclocked speed, then save your money. But I know there aren't many of you out there that are not going to put this new cII through the ringer and get all the speed out of it as you can. All benchmarks and mhz will vary from system to system. So please don't bombard us w/emails saying that your new cII wont hit 892mhz @1.75v. Now if your cII hits over 900mhz+, feel free to let me know cause we here at the {OCA} will like to keep up with our peeps and their systems and that extra mile they get out of them, past what the manufacturer has allotted us.

3dMark2000 cII 566mhz 

3dMark2000 c366 @ 567mhz

Whoa nellie!! Yes, them marks are correct.

Conclusions: As you can see previously, the c366 overclocked to 567mhz actually will give you better 3dmarks than the cII 566. Now don't take this as a downer on the cII as we haven't overclocked the cII at all for this review. I have overclocked my new cII and it does very well, upwards of 850+mhz @1.70volts. But for many of you peeps out there who are like me on a budget and don't want to throw down $100 for a new cII with slotket. You can get the same effect out of a $40-$50 Celeron 366 and get the same if not better marks for 1/2 da price.

Now like I said, the new cII 566 will give you better results when it is pushed to higher bus speeds and will put the hurt down on the ol' c366 @567mhz. I have had my new cII running for the last 2 weeks @892mhz @1.75v with no lockups and no crashes. I have run 3dmark and all Q3 demos ran in this article and I can say that the cII will give better performance when it is overclocked.

My conclusion for all this is that if you're not going to overclock a new cII and your currently running a c366 at any overclocked speed, then save your money. But I know there aren't many of you out there that are not going to put this new cII through the ringer and get all the speed out of it as you can. All benchmarks and mhz will vary from system to system. So please don't bombard us w/emails saying that your new cII wont hit 892mhz @1.75v. Now if your cII hits over 900mhz+, feel free to let me know cause we here at the {OCA} will like to keep up with our peeps and their systems and that extra mile they get out of them, past what the manufacturer has allotted us.

3dMark2000 cII 566mhz 

3dMark2000 c366 @ 567mhz

Whoa nellie!! Yes, them marks are correct.

Conclusions: As you can see previously, the c366 overclocked to 567mhz actually will give you better 3dmarks than the cII 566. Now don't take this as a downer on the cII as we haven't overclocked the cII at all for this review. I have overclocked my new cII and it does very well, upwards of 850+mhz @1.70volts. But for many of you peeps out there who are like me on a budget and don't want to throw down $100 for a new cII with slotket. You can get the same effect out of a $40-$50 Celeron 366 and get the same if not better marks for 1/2 da price.

Now like I said, the new cII 566 will give you better results when it is pushed to higher bus speeds and will put the hurt down on the ol' c366 @567mhz. I have had my new cII running for the last 2 weeks @892mhz @1.75v with no lockups and no crashes. I have run 3dmark and all Q3 demos ran in this article and I can say that the cII will give better performance when it is overclocked.

My conclusion for all this is that if you're not going to overclock a new cII and your currently running a c366 at any overclocked speed, then save your money. But I know there aren't many of you out there that are not going to put this new cII through the ringer and get all the speed out of it as you can. All benchmarks and mhz will vary from system to system. So please don't bombard us w/emails saying that your new cII wont hit 892mhz @1.75v. Now if your cII hits over 900mhz+, feel free to let me know cause we here at the {OCA} will like to keep up with our peeps and their systems and that extra mile they get out of them, past what the manufacturer has allotted us.

3dMark2000 cII 566mhz 

3dMark2000 c366 @ 567mhz

Whoa nellie!! Yes, them marks are correct.

Conclusions: As you can see previously, the c366 overclocked to 567mhz actually will give you better 3dmarks than the cII 566. Now don't take this as a downer on the cII as we haven't overclocked the cII at all for this review. I have overclocked my new cII and it does very well, upwards of 850+mhz @1.70volts. But for many of you peeps out there who are like me on a budget and don't want to throw down $100 for a new cII with slotket. You can get the same effect out of a $40-$50 Celeron 366 and get the same if not better marks for 1/2 da price.

Now like I said, the new cII 566 will give you better results when it is pushed to higher bus speeds and will put the hurt down on the ol' c366 @567mhz. I have had my new cII running for the last 2 weeks @892mhz @1.75v with no lockups and no crashes. I have run 3dmark and all Q3 demos ran in this article and I can say that the cII will give better performance when it is overclocked.

My conclusion for all this is that if you're not going to overclock a new cII and your currently running a c366 at any overclocked speed, then save your money. But I know there aren't many of you out there that are not going to put this new cII through the ringer and get all the speed out of it as you can. All benchmarks and mhz will vary from system to system. So please don't bombard us w/emails saying that your new cII wont hit 892mhz @1.75v. Now if your cII hits over 900mhz+, feel free to let me know cause we here at the {OCA} will like to keep up with our peeps and their systems and that extra mile they get out of them, past what the manufacturer has allotted us.

3dMark2000 cII 566mhz 

3dMark2000 c366 @ 567mhz

Whoa nellie!! Yes, them marks are correct.

Conclusions: As you can see previously, the c366 overclocked to 567mhz actually will give you better 3dmarks than the cII 566. Now don't take this as a downer on the cII as we haven't overclocked the cII at all for this review. I have overclocked my new cII and it does very well, upwards of 850+mhz @1.70volts. But for many of you peeps out there who are like me on a budget and don't want to throw down $100 for a new cII with slotket. You can get the same effect out of a $40-$50 Celeron 366 and get the same if not better marks for 1/2 da price.

Now like I said, the new cII 566 will give you better results when it is pushed to higher bus speeds and will put the hurt down on the ol' c366 @567mhz. I have had my new cII running for the last 2 weeks @892mhz @1.75v with no lockups and no crashes. I have run 3dmark and all Q3 demos ran in this article and I can say that the cII will give better performance when it is overclocked.

My conclusion for all this is that if you're not going to overclock a new cII and your currently running a c366 at any overclocked speed, then save your money. But I know there aren't many of you out there that are not going to put this new cII through the ringer and get all the speed out of it as you can. All benchmarks and mhz will vary from system to system. So please don't bombard us w/emails saying that your new cII wont hit 892mhz @1.75v. Now if your cII hits over 900mhz+, feel free to let me know cause we here at the {OCA} will like to keep up with our peeps and their systems and that extra mile they get out of them, past what the manufacturer has allotted us.