Computer Processors
  Home arrow Computer Processors arrow Page 5 - AMD Venice
Dev Hardware Forums 
Computer Cases  
Computer Processors  
Computer Systems  
Digital Cameras  
Flat Panels  
Gaming  
Hardware Guides  
Hardware News  
Input Devices  
Memory  
Mobile Devices  
Motherboards  
Networking Hardware  
Opinions  
PC Cooling  
PC Speakers  
Peripherals  
Power Supply Units  
Software  
Sound Cards  
Storage Devices  
Tech Interviews  
User Experiences  
Video Cards  
Mobile Linux 
APP Generation ROI 
IBM® developerWorks 
Weekly Newsletter
 
Developer Updates  
Free Website Content 
 RSS  Articles
 RSS  Forums
 RSS  All Feeds
Write For Us Get Paid 
Request Media Kit
Contact Us 
Site Map 
Privacy Policy 
Support 
 USERNAME
 
 PASSWORD
 
 
  >>> SIGN UP!  
  Lost Password? 
COMPUTER PROCESSORS

AMD Venice
By: jkabaseball
  • Search For More Articles!
  • Disclaimer
  • Author Terms
  • Rating: 3 stars3 stars3 stars3 stars3 stars / 33
    2005-06-14

    Table of Contents:
  • AMD Venice
  • Overclocking
  • Testing
  • More Testing
  • Conclusion

  • Rate this Article: Poor Best 
      ADD THIS ARTICLE TO:
      Del.ici.ous Digg
      Blink Simpy
      Google Spurl
      Y! MyWeb Furl
    Email Me Similar Content When Posted
    Add Developer Shed Article Feed To Your Site
    Email Article To Friend
    Print Version Of Article
    PDF Version Of Article
     
     
    ADVERTISEMENT


    AMD Venice - Conclusion


    (Page 5 of 5 )

    In this review we took a look at the AMD Athlon 64 with the new Venice core. AMD has tweaked the core a bit and added some extras, like SSE3, and gave it a new name. To see what AMD has been up to I brought out its brother, the Winchester. Just as how the boxes are exactly the same, the two different cores performed the same clock for clock. The improved memory controller appears to be worse then before. Still can’t run 4 sticks of memory at DDR400, and the total bandwidth has decreased. The Venice core adds SSE3 support which has been an Intel only up until this point. There isn’t even much software that is capable of taking advantage of SEE3 yet. Once some software that is optimized for it comes out, hopefully we will see a difference. Until then don’t expect to get anything more of the Venice clock for clock.

    So who should run out and buy a Venice? I would recommend it to a few types of people. Extreme overclockers, who will go and buy a few of them until they find a good one, should pick up Venice. If you don’t have an A64 and are planning on upgrading, then I would buy this over the older Winchesters as they cost about the same.

    Most people probably have an A64 which overclocks to their needs already. As this review has shown, clock for clock these two chips are basically the same. You should only buy if for the little more head room, and gambling on a good overclock is just that, a gamble. Yes, the Venice cores are frequently breaking 2.7 GHz, but if you’re at lets say 2.5GHz, which is a moderate overclock, is the extra 200 MHz worth it? It’s up to you.

    Thank you for reading the DevHardware review of the AMD A64 Venice. If you have any questions feel free to drop by the forums.


    DISCLAIMER: The content provided in this article is not warranted or guaranteed by Developer Shed, Inc. The content provided is intended for entertainment and/or educational purposes in order to introduce to the reader key ideas, concepts, and/or product reviews. As such it is incumbent upon the reader to employ real-world tactics for security and implementation of best practices. We are not liable for any negative consequences that may result from implementing any information covered in our articles or tutorials. If this is a hardware review, it is not recommended to open and/or modify your hardware.

       · I have got a Winchester 3200+ and Venice 3200+ too.I can boot Win XP64 on Raid0 in...
       · Well....Bios probably were not set up to differenciate the chips.Also...
     

    COMPUTER PROCESSORS ARTICLES

    - Intel`s Ultra-Quick i5 and i7 Processors Ava...
    - Intel Nehalem
    - VIA Nano
    - Intel Atom
    - Intel Celeron 420
    - Intel Pentium E2140
    - Inside the Machine by Jon Stokes
    - Chip History from 1970 to Today
    - A Brief History of Chips
    - Intel Shows Off at Developer Forum
    - Core 2 Quadro Review
    - Core Concepts
    - AMD Takes on Intel with AM2 and HT
    - Intel Presler 955: Benchmarking the First 65...
    - Computer Chip Scam, Pentium Pirates






    © 2003-2009 by Developer Shed. All rights reserved. DS Cluster 2 Hosted by Hostway
    For more Enterprise Application Development news, visit eWeek