Computer Processors
  Home arrow Computer Processors arrow Page 4 - AMD Venice
Dev Hardware Forums 
Computer Cases  
Computer Processors  
Computer Systems  
Digital Cameras  
Flat Panels  
Hardware Guides  
Hardware News  
Input Devices  
Memory  
Mobile Devices  
Motherboards  
Networking Hardware  
Opinions  
PC Cooling  
PC Gaming  
PC Speakers  
Peripherals  
Power Supply Units  
Software  
Sound Cards  
Storage Devices  
Tech Interviews  
User Experiences  
Video Cards  
Mobile Linux 
APP Generation ROI 
IBM® developerWorks 
Sun Developer Network 
Weekly Newsletter
 
Developer Updates  
Free Website Content 
 RSS  Articles
 RSS  Forums
 RSS  All Feeds
Write For Us Get Paid 
Request Media Kit
Contact Us 
Site Map 
Privacy Policy 
Support 
 USERNAME
 
 PASSWORD
 
 
  >>> SIGN UP!  
  Lost Password? 
COMPUTER PROCESSORS

AMD Venice
By: jkabaseball
  • Search For More Articles!
  • Disclaimer
  • Author Terms
  • Rating: 3 stars3 stars3 stars3 stars3 stars / 33
    2005-06-14

    Table of Contents:
  • AMD Venice
  • Overclocking
  • Testing
  • More Testing
  • Conclusion

  • Rate this Article: Poor Best 
      ADD THIS ARTICLE TO:
      Del.ici.ous Digg
      Blink Simpy
      Google Spurl
      Y! MyWeb Furl
    Email Me Similar Content When Posted
    Add Developer Shed Article Feed To Your Site
    Email Article To Friend
    Print Version Of Article
    PDF Version Of Article
     
     
    ADVERTISEMENT


    AMD Venice - More Testing


    (Page 4 of 5 )

    POV-Ray

    POV-Ray is a rendering program. For this test I ran the benchmark picture on the default resolution of 512 x 384 with no AA.

    LAME

    Now we have some audio encoding. I used the LAME codec with the front end program dBpowerAMP Music Converter. For the music I used the CD Linkin Park Meteor. I first copied the CD over to WAV files to take any bottleneck from the CD-ROM that may have occurred.

    Once again there are no gains. I'm sure there are no bottlenecks, as I also tested the Venice overclocked. The score improved (went down) when overclocked, so that shows CPU speed was a main factor in these scores.

    Memory Controller

    The new Venice cores are supposed to have better, more up to date memory controller. Since we can’t take a look at the physical memory controller on the chip, we have to look at the results from them and see if the new one is really better like AMD says. The tests will be synthetic benchmarks, as they show possible performance differences. Here are the results from Sandra.

    So much for that better memory controller, the Winchester posts the first definite win in these tests. The Winchester beat the Venice by over 200 MB/sec. I ran these test over a dozen times to make sure what I was getting was real. So how does this effect real life performance? Well, from our tests, not at all.

    If you tried to use 4 sticks of memory with a Winchester, the memory speed would be put to DDR333 instead of DDR400. The Venice core is meant to fix this, allowing the memory to run DDR400. I put 2 GB of memory, 4 512MB sticks, and rebooted. It booted fine into windows, and was stable. I opened up CPU-Z, and this is what I got:

    Oops! Look at the frequency. That memory controller doesn’t look like it is quite fixed yet. This was the auto setting in the BIOS for the memory speed. I next tried to set it to 200 MHz, and Windows couldn’t adjust. Next I put it back onto auto, and then got into windows, and with A64tweaker, I set the speed from 166MHz, to 200MHz, fined up CPU-Z. Same results, like I never even changed it. So much for that improved memory controller; it looks to me like they broke it.

    More Computer Processors Articles
    More By jkabaseball


       · I have got a Winchester 3200+ and Venice 3200+ too.I can boot Win XP64 on Raid0 in...
       · Well....Bios probably were not set up to differenciate the chips.Also...
     

    COMPUTER PROCESSORS ARTICLES

    - VIA Nano
    - Intel Atom
    - Intel Celeron 420
    - Intel Pentium E2140
    - Inside the Machine by Jon Stokes
    - Chip History from 1970 to Today
    - A Brief History of Chips
    - Intel Shows Off at Developer Forum
    - Core 2 Quadro Review
    - Core Concepts
    - AMD Takes on Intel with AM2 and HT
    - Intel Presler 955: Benchmarking the First 65...
    - Computer Chip Scam, Pentium Pirates
    - Intel Beating AMD in the Race to 65nm Process
    - Magnetic Microchips Provide New Spin on Proc...






    © 2003-2008 by Developer Shed. All rights reserved. DS Cluster 3 hosted by Hostway
    Stay green...Green IT