Computer Processors
  Home arrow Computer Processors arrow Page 3 - AMD Venice
Dev Hardware Forums 
Computer Cases  
Computer Processors  
Computer Systems  
Digital Cameras  
Flat Panels  
Hardware Guides  
Hardware News  
Input Devices  
Memory  
Mobile Devices  
Motherboards  
Networking Hardware  
Opinions  
PC Cooling  
PC Gaming  
PC Speakers  
Peripherals  
Power Supply Units  
Software  
Sound Cards  
Storage Devices  
Tech Interviews  
User Experiences  
Video Cards  
Mobile Linux 
APP Generation ROI 
IBM® developerWorks 
Sun Developer Network 
Weekly Newsletter
 
Developer Updates  
Free Website Content 
 RSS  Articles
 RSS  Forums
 RSS  All Feeds
Write For Us Get Paid 
Request Media Kit
Contact Us 
Site Map 
Privacy Policy 
Support 
 USERNAME
 
 PASSWORD
 
 
  >>> SIGN UP!  
  Lost Password? 
COMPUTER PROCESSORS

AMD Venice
By: jkabaseball
  • Search For More Articles!
  • Disclaimer
  • Author Terms
  • Rating: 3 stars3 stars3 stars3 stars3 stars / 33
    2005-06-14

    Table of Contents:
  • AMD Venice
  • Overclocking
  • Testing
  • More Testing
  • Conclusion

  • Rate this Article: Poor Best 
      ADD THIS ARTICLE TO:
      Del.ici.ous Digg
      Blink Simpy
      Google Spurl
      Y! MyWeb Furl
    Email Me Similar Content When Posted
    Add Developer Shed Article Feed To Your Site
    Email Article To Friend
    Print Version Of Article
    PDF Version Of Article
     
     
    ADVERTISEMENT


    AMD Venice - Testing


    (Page 3 of 5 )

    This is going to be straight forword. I'm going to use the same set up, but I'll switch CPUs and reset the CMOS between the chips. The tests won’t focus on gaming like pervious reviews, but more on some of the various jobs a CPU may be called on to perform. The test computer looks like this:

    • DFI LanParty NF4 Ultra-D
    • OCZ Platinum PC4800
    • X300SE
    • OCZ PowerStream 520
    • Windows XP x64

    Sandra

    The Sandra suite of programs tests the theoretical performance of the parts of the computer. The tests used are geared at the CPU. This should be one of the tests that show the biggest difference in the two cores. It tests everything each core can do, not how it is utilized like in the other tests. This version is complied for 64-bit.

    Games

    Time for some gaming. As I said, I’m not going to go too far into gaming performance as there are other areas that will effect gaming more, but it is still worth checking out. The games are going to be Far Cry, Doom 3, and Half-Life 2.

    The results are all basically the same. The newer core does not make a difference in gaming. All the scores were too close to make a difference. Any gains or loses are within the error range of a few runs, and with more testing the averages would have been the same. If I had overclocked both chips, however, the winner would be obvious.

    SuperPi

    This is a simple test that calculates the digits of pi, which is a good test for number-crunching processors.

    Once again, the difference is within the margin of error. It would also probably average out the same over many tests.

    More Computer Processors Articles
    More By jkabaseball


       · I have got a Winchester 3200+ and Venice 3200+ too.I can boot Win XP64 on Raid0 in...
       · Well....Bios probably were not set up to differenciate the chips.Also...
     

    COMPUTER PROCESSORS ARTICLES

    - VIA Nano
    - Intel Atom
    - Intel Celeron 420
    - Intel Pentium E2140
    - Inside the Machine by Jon Stokes
    - Chip History from 1970 to Today
    - A Brief History of Chips
    - Intel Shows Off at Developer Forum
    - Core 2 Quadro Review
    - Core Concepts
    - AMD Takes on Intel with AM2 and HT
    - Intel Presler 955: Benchmarking the First 65...
    - Computer Chip Scam, Pentium Pirates
    - Intel Beating AMD in the Race to 65nm Process
    - Magnetic Microchips Provide New Spin on Proc...






    © 2003-2008 by Developer Shed. All rights reserved. DS Cluster 6 hosted by Hostway
    Stay green...Green IT