Computer Processors
  Home arrow Computer Processors arrow Page 4 - AMD Takes on Intel with AM2 and HT
Dev Hardware Forums 
Computer Cases  
Computer Processors  
Computer Systems  
Digital Cameras  
Flat Panels  
Hardware Guides  
Hardware News  
Input Devices  
Memory  
Mobile Devices  
Motherboards  
Networking Hardware  
Opinions  
PC Cooling  
PC Gaming  
PC Speakers  
Peripherals  
Power Supply Units  
Software  
Sound Cards  
Storage Devices  
Tech Interviews  
User Experiences  
Video Cards  
Dedicated Servers  
Moblin 
JMSL Numerical Library 
IBM® developerWorks 
Sun Developer Network 
Weekly Newsletter
 
Developer Updates  
Free Website Content 
 RSS  Articles
 RSS  Forums
 RSS  All Feeds
Write For Us Get Paid 
Request Media Kit
Contact Us 
Site Map 
Privacy Policy 
Support 
 USERNAME
 
 PASSWORD
 
 
  >>> SIGN UP!  
  Lost Password? 
COMPUTER PROCESSORS

AMD Takes on Intel with AM2 and HT
By: Developer Shed
  • Search For More Articles!
  • Disclaimer
  • Author Terms
  • Rating: 4 stars4 stars4 stars4 stars4 stars / 18
    2006-04-18

    Table of Contents:
  • AMD Takes on Intel with AM2 and HT
  • Preparing Socket AM2 for Release
  • AM2 Means DDR2
  • Plans for Extending HyperTransport

  • Rate this Article: Poor Best 
      ADD THIS ARTICLE TO:
      Del.ici.ous Digg
      Blink Simpy
      Google Spurl
      Y! MyWeb Furl
    Email Me Similar Content When Posted
    Add Developer Shed Article Feed To Your Site
    Email Article To Friend
    Print Version Of Article
    PDF Version Of Article
     
     
    ADVERTISEMENT


    AMD Takes on Intel with AM2 and HT - Plans for Extending HyperTransport


    (Page 4 of 4 )

    Plans for Extending HyperTransport

    AMD may not be changing their processors immediately, but they are not resting. HyperTransport (HT), as many of you know, can be used to replace the front-side bus (FSB) in some chipsets as well as interconnect multiple processors. HyperTransport offers up to 22.4 GB/s bandwidth, which is considerably better than alternatives such as the FSB architecture that Intel is currently using. It is this technology AMD is focusing on right now, and with good reason.

    In order to improve the flexibility and effectiveness of HT for using their processors in diverse implementations, AMD is planning to license Coherent HyperTransport technology to other companies. The chipmaker wants to show off how their interconnect technology works and how it interacts with their processors. This, they hope, will allow their entire platform to become more flexible for those who need customized platforms.

    Currently, multiprocessor systems are built primarily to handle a heavy load. Some applications, however, would benefit more from a specialized coprocessor. Licensing the technology allows other companies to develop a multiprocessor platform for specific applications. Phil Hestor of AMD explained how the company is looking to develop HyperTransport:

    People like Cray and others would like to do vector floating-point units. Being able to do that requires a co-processor, or attached processor elements that would attach into a standard system.

    We don't have any finalized plans yet, but if you look at the workloads in the data center, you're starting to see applications where, if you could accelerate XML and Java, a number of the vertical applications would perform significantly better. So instead of trying to build a machine that's just aimed at workloads, you can think about the attached processor or co-processor that works in conjunction with our AMD64 architecture to accelerate those workloads. (Source)

    AMD is probably crossing their fingers that the HyperTransport license becomes so widely accepted in servers and specialized applications that Intel either has to engineer a compatible architecture or license it. Of course, this side of AMD's plans is not aimed at desktop consumers. This will strengthen AMD's hold on servers if it goes as planned.

    More or less, you can expect AM2 to look a lot like 939 for a little while. If you are shopping for a new computer now, it may be best advice to hold off for a couple months. AM2 will give you a longer upgrade path for CPU and memory, and Intel's Conroe is sure to overpower a lot of the x86 market for a while.

    Aside from upgrades though, there's not much reason not to go with 939; for those of us with decent 939 systems, they'll still be top-of-the-line for some time and probably offer bargain upgrades later when everyone is switching.


    DISCLAIMER: The content provided in this article is not warranted or guaranteed by Developer Shed, Inc. The content provided is intended for entertainment and/or educational purposes in order to introduce to the reader key ideas, concepts, and/or product reviews. As such it is incumbent upon the reader to employ real-world tactics for security and implementation of best practices. We are not liable for any negative consequences that may result from implementing any information covered in our articles or tutorials. If this is a hardware review, it is not recommended to open and/or modify your hardware.

       · If you have any comments, please share them.
       · Conroe chipset , will probably cost oodles. But I already want one , but I am...
     

    Recommended by Dev Hardware

    COMPUTER PROCESSORS ARTICLES

    - Intel Celeron 420
    - Intel Pentium E2140
    - Inside the Machine by Jon Stokes
    - Chip History from 1970 to Today
    - A Brief History of Chips
    - Intel Shows Off at Developer Forum
    - Core 2 Quadro Review
    - Core Concepts
    - AMD Takes on Intel with AM2 and HT
    - Intel Presler 955: Benchmarking the First 65...
    - Computer Chip Scam, Pentium Pirates
    - Intel Beating AMD in the Race to 65nm Process
    - Magnetic Microchips Provide New Spin on Proc...
    - Intel’s Latest Chips: It’s All About (Low) P...
    - 3D Processors, Stacking Cores






    © 2003-2008 by Developer Shed. All rights reserved. DS Cluster 6 hosted by Hostway