Computer Processors
  Home arrow Computer Processors arrow Page 5 - A Review of the Pentium M on the Deskt...
Dev Hardware Forums 
Computer Cases  
Computer Processors  
Computer Systems  
Digital Cameras  
Flat Panels  
Gaming  
Hardware Guides  
Hardware News  
Input Devices  
Memory  
Mobile Devices  
Motherboards  
Networking Hardware  
Opinions  
PC Cooling  
PC Speakers  
Peripherals  
Power Supply Units  
Software  
Sound Cards  
Storage Devices  
Tech Interviews  
User Experiences  
Video Cards  
Mobile Linux 
APP Generation ROI 
IBM® developerWorks 
Weekly Newsletter
 
Developer Updates  
Free Website Content 
 RSS  Articles
 RSS  Forums
 RSS  All Feeds
Write For Us Get Paid 
Request Media Kit
Contact Us 
Site Map 
Privacy Policy 
Support 
 USERNAME
 
 PASSWORD
 
 
  >>> SIGN UP!  
  Lost Password? 
COMPUTER PROCESSORS

A Review of the Pentium M on the Desktop
By: DMOS
  • Search For More Articles!
  • Disclaimer
  • Author Terms
  • Rating: 3 stars3 stars3 stars3 stars3 stars / 17
    2005-01-10

    Table of Contents:
  • A Review of the Pentium M on the Desktop
  • Netburst and Dothan
  • Two options
  • Don't try this at home?
  • Benchmarking
  • Super Pi, Unreal Tournament
  • LAME, DivX

  • Rate this Article: Poor Best 
      ADD THIS ARTICLE TO:
      Del.ici.ous Digg
      Blink Simpy
      Google Spurl
      Y! MyWeb Furl
    Email Me Similar Content When Posted
    Add Developer Shed Article Feed To Your Site
    Email Article To Friend
    Print Version Of Article
    PDF Version Of Article
     
     
    ADVERTISEMENT


    A Review of the Pentium M on the Desktop - Benchmarking


    (Page 5 of 7 )

    For those that just can't stay patient for the DFI motherboard review coming up tomorrow, I'll allow you to see some benchmarks of just what this system can run. I'm going to hold most of them for that review -- I have to have some reason for y'all to come back and read through that, right? At any rate, let's get to some of the tests!

    • Intel Pentium M 735
    • AMD Sempron 3100+
    • AMD Athlon 64 3200+ @ 1.8GHz
    • DFI Lanparty nF3-250Gb
    • DFI 855GME-MGF
    • Kingston Hyper X 3000 (2*512MB)
    • 2x80GB Hitachi 7K250 HD's in 64k stripe RAID 0
    • Radeon 8500 LE
    • Adobe After Effects
    • STARS CFD Solver
    • Super Pi
    • Unreal Tournament 2K3
    • LAME MP3 Encoding
    • DivX

    Adobe After Effects

    A Review of the Pentium M on the Desktop

    There are two parts to this benchmark. The first computation is mainly CPU based, while the second is more system oriented. (For more information, please go to Media Motion: http://www.media-motion.tv/aebenchmarks.html) In the first test the Pentium M at a stock speed of 1.7GHz is competitive with the Sempron 3100+ and what is an imaginary A64 3000+. A normal A64 3200+ scores around 2.75 and 35 minutes respectively.

    Starting right off here we see that MHz do not rule all. Even with a clock speed "disadvantage" to the AMD products, the Pentium M manages to rule the roost. Overclocked to 2.26 GHz the P-M runs right beside the 2.57GHz Sempron in both tests, barely winning the first computation and losing the more system dependent one by a little over a minute. The other piece of information to extract from this graph is how bandwidth-starved the Pentium M is at stock speed. While leaving the clock speed the same, but increasing the bus and memory speeds to 141 and 189 MHz from 100 and 133, the P-M drops a full minute off its time in the second comp.

    STARS CFD

    A Review of the Pentium M on the Desktop

    This test, provided by Oklahoma State University’s CASE Lab, is an excellent tool representing common computational fluid dynamic simulators. It's also an example of pure floating point math abilities. This had been a test where the A64 was king, absolutely beating the crap out of a Pentium4 and the Sempron. I have an old run of this same benchmark left over from my P4 2.4C system overclocked to 3.2GHz, where it ran 236s, similar to the Sempron 3100+ and Pentium M 735 at stock speed.

    The Pentium M though shines when you remove its bandwidth limitation by increasing the bus and memory clocks. Increasing the clock speed makes it truly dominant, ripping off the fastest run I've managed with any of my systems of late, in any configuration. I should also mention this was done with the stock heatsink, with stock voltage, and nothing more than a little playing around with Clockgen. There's lots more speed to be extracted out of this chip than just 2.26GHz.

    More Computer Processors Articles
    More By DMOS


     

    COMPUTER PROCESSORS ARTICLES

    - Intel`s Ultra-Quick i5 and i7 Processors Ava...
    - Intel Nehalem
    - VIA Nano
    - Intel Atom
    - Intel Celeron 420
    - Intel Pentium E2140
    - Inside the Machine by Jon Stokes
    - Chip History from 1970 to Today
    - A Brief History of Chips
    - Intel Shows Off at Developer Forum
    - Core 2 Quadro Review
    - Core Concepts
    - AMD Takes on Intel with AM2 and HT
    - Intel Presler 955: Benchmarking the First 65...
    - Computer Chip Scam, Pentium Pirates






    © 2003-2009 by Developer Shed. All rights reserved. DS Cluster 2 Hosted by Hostway
    For more Enterprise Application Development news, visit eWeek