Computer Processors

  Home arrow Computer Processors arrow Page 2 - 2GHz Celeron
Watch our Tech Videos 
Dev Hardware Forums 
Computer Cases  
Computer Processors  
Computer Systems  
Digital Cameras  
Flat Panels  
Gaming  
Hardware Guides  
Hardware News  
Input Devices  
Memory  
Mobile Devices  
Motherboards  
Networking Hardware  
Opinions  
PC Cooling  
PC Speakers  
Peripherals  
Power Supply Units  
Software  
Sound Cards  
Storage Devices  
Tech Interviews  
User Experiences  
Video Cards  
Weekly Newsletter
 
Developer Updates  
Free Website Content 
 RSS  Articles
 RSS  Forums
 RSS  All Feeds
Write For Us 
Contact Us 
Site Map 
Privacy Policy 
Support 
 USERNAME
 
 PASSWORD
 
 
  >>> SIGN UP!  
  Lost Password? 
COMPUTER PROCESSORS

2GHz Celeron
By: Poiuy223
  • Search For More Articles!
  • Disclaimer
  • Author Terms
  • Rating: 3 stars3 stars3 stars3 stars3 stars / 9
    2003-10-09

    Table of Contents:
  • 2GHz Celeron
  • Conclusion

  • Rate this Article: Poor Best 
      ADD THIS ARTICLE TO:
      Del.ici.ous Digg
      Blink Simpy
      Google Spurl
      Y! MyWeb Furl
    Email Me Similar Content When Posted
    Add Developer Shed Article Feed To Your Site
    Email Article To Friend
    Print Version Of Article
    PDF Version Of Article
     
     

    SEARCH DEV HARDWARE

    2GHz Celeron - Conclusion


    (Page 2 of 2 )

    Testing
    For testing purposes, I compared the Intel Celeron 2GHZ against the Intel Pentium 4 2.0A (based on the Northwood core) and the AMD Athlon XP2000+.  According to AMD, the XP2000+ is rated to compete with the performance of 2GHZ processors. 

    Intel Celeron:  128kb cache

    Intel Pentium 4:  512kb cache

    AMD Athlon XP2000+:  256kb cache

     

    Test System (INTEL)

    • Intel Celeron 2GHZ

    • Intel Pentium 4 2.0A GHZ

    • Abit BG7

    • 256mb PC2700 Samsung

    • Quantum Bigfoot ATA33 12gb

    • ATI Radeon 7200

    • Netgear FA311 NIC

    • Generic 52x CD-Rom

    • Antec SX830

    • Raidmax 400watt power supply

    Test System (AMD)

    • AMD Athlon XP2000+

    • Abit KX7

    • 256mb PC2700 Samsung

    • Quantum Bigfoot ATA33 12gb

    • ATI Radeon 7200

    • Netgear FA311 NIC

    • Generic 52x CD-Rom

    • Antec SX830

    • Raidmax 400watt power supply

    Tests

    I used a Radeon 7200 instead of a high end video card was to make the 3DMark score completely dependent on the CPU and not the video card.  During testing, all memory settings are set to as low as possible--to obtain highest overclock.  The great performing Swiftech MCX4000 with a Y.S. Tech TMD fan was used on the socket 478.  The good performing GlobalWIN CAK4 with the clear thermal fan was used on the socket A.

    Tests were done under Windows XP Professional w/ SP1.

       

    Results

    Cache results

    Intel Celeron:

              

    Celeron @ 2GHZ            Celeron @ 2.86GHZ

    Intel Pentium 4:

              

    Pentium 4 @ 2GHZ         Pentium 4 @ 2.86GHZ

    AMD Athlon XP2000+:

              

    Athlon XP2000+             Athlon XP2000+ @ XP2200+

     

    As you can see from the results that the lack of L2 cache is causing the Celeron a performance hit in PCMark2002.  In overclocking the Celeron to 2.86GHZ, it was barely able to catch up to the Athlon XP2000+.  One thing to note however is that the Celeron was able to perform rather well during integer and floating point calculations.  In fact, it outperformed the Northwood 2A.  This should be because of the new core stepping--C1. Also notice the memory scores dropped when the Celeron was clocked in @3.06GHz. This was because we had to lower the FSB Ratio to accommodate the higher overclock. A higher clock will certainly help CPU scores, but dropping the FSB hurts bandwidth and lowers the Memory score.


    Overclocking
    The Celeron overclocked extremely well.  Using the Swiftech MCX4000 with the Y.S. Tech TMD fan, I was able to achieve a maximum stable overclock of 3.06GHZ (20 x 153).  This is a very nice 53% increase.  This was done with maximum voltage at 1.75v on the CPU, H/W strap set to Low, and DDR ratio was set to 1:1.  Cas setting was set to 2.5-6-3-3. 

              

    wCPUid                   Celeron 3.06GHZ

    When the Celeron is operating at 3.06GHZ, it is running at blazing speeds.  CPU intensive scores show that it gives highest benchmark.  3DMark, however, shows otherwise.  If you suspected 3DMark2k1 was FSB hungry, this will definitely confirm your suspicions, as you'll see below.

     


    Conclusion
    What can be said about the Celeron other than that it packs a hefty punch for a budget processor.  A quick check on Pricewatch.com shows a rough estimate of about $89.  The Northwood 2A comes in at nearly double the price of around $164.  The cheapest of all 3 CPU's is the Athlon XP2000+ which is about $74.  Users are sure to pick up the XP2000+ because it gives lots of power for such a low price.  I, however, would choose the Celeron 2GHz if I was on a tight budget.  The overclockability and performance is admirable and the stability of the Intel chipsets combined with this CPU would be a great choice for any enthusiast.  AMD users have to deal with VIA's compatibility issues and the tedious task of unlocking their CPU's.  I, for one, try to avoid it.  Although the Celery may lack slightly in gaming performance, it gives users a good bang for the buck in CPU intensive applications such as encoding and file compressions.  Not all hardcore gamers have the need to get a top end CPU to edit photos and mess around with videos.  The Celeron has certainly come back and showed us a little surprise. 

    Pros

    * Great Price

    * Smaller Die size lets it run cool

    * Overclocks like a CHAMP!

    * Good performance for CPU intensive programs such as compressing files

    Cons

    * Only has 128kb of L2 cache

    * Lack of L2 cache hurts gaming performance

    Final Rating:  8/10

     

     

    Thanks for joining us here today for the 2GHz Celeron Review. If you would like to discuss this article or any others, checkout the OCAddiction Forums. Or feel free to head back to the front page and checkout other news from top notch hardware websites.

     


    DISCLAIMER: The content provided in this article is not warranted or guaranteed by Developer Shed, Inc. The content provided is intended for entertainment and/or educational purposes in order to introduce to the reader key ideas, concepts, and/or product reviews. As such it is incumbent upon the reader to employ real-world tactics for security and implementation of best practices. We are not liable for any negative consequences that may result from implementing any information covered in our articles or tutorials. If this is a hardware review, it is not recommended to open and/or modify your hardware.
    blog comments powered by Disqus

    COMPUTER PROCESSORS ARTICLES

    - Intel Unveils Itanium 9500 Processors
    - Intel`s Ultra-Quick i5 and i7 Processors Ava...
    - Intel Nehalem
    - VIA Nano
    - Intel Atom
    - Intel Celeron 420
    - Intel Pentium E2140
    - Inside the Machine by Jon Stokes
    - Chip History from 1970 to Today
    - A Brief History of Chips
    - Intel Shows Off at Developer Forum
    - Core 2 Quadro Review
    - Core Concepts
    - AMD Takes on Intel with AM2 and HT
    - Intel Presler 955: Benchmarking the First 65...

    Developer Shed Affiliates

     




    © 2003-2019 by Developer Shed. All rights reserved. DS Cluster - Follow our Sitemap
    KEITHLEE2zdeconfigurator/configs/INFUSIONSOFT_OVERLAY.phpzdeconfigurator/configs/ OFFLOADING INFUSIONSOFTLOADING INFUSIONSOFT 1debug:overlay status: OFF
    overlay not displayed overlay cookie defined: TI_CAMPAIGN_1012_D OVERLAY COOKIE set:
    status off